NMSFNO, FSH Variant, Basic 9 Fire Prep Test

Joined
Dec 31, 2005
Messages
2,984
Yesterday was the first "dry" day we have had for the past 3 or 4 days albeit it was dark and overcast and I decided it would be interesting to see if making a fire would be "doable" after all the rain and snow melt we have had which has saturated the ground.

Initially I started this task thinking I would compare a NMSFNO which I had just stripped and given a fully convexed edge with my FSH Variant which still has the factory edge on it and whilst done in the classical manner is nicely sharp. Here are the knives ....

P1010027.jpg


I wanted to use them preping some tinder ... so gathered a few dead wood branches from trees which were about as good as you could manage and were drier than wood lying on the ground.

P1010028.jpg


I got some bark as well with a view to using it as a base to get a fire going but it was so soaked through I had to bin that idea and as you will see I went with using a flat stone. The ground was far too wet to expect a fire to "take" and using the stone as a base is a good option.

Firstly though I needed to get some kindling prepared .... I don't know how others do this but we usually spread out a "tarp" to gather shavings on or if you are working with what is on your belt/webbing we use a waterproof jacket laid out on the ground which works just as well ....

P1010029.jpg


Working with knives this size trying to prepare feather sticks can often have you making about 3 or 4 good shavings only to find that on the 5th you cut through the other 4 and if you don't have a tarp to catch them on they drop to the soaking ground and are wasted .... plus if you are in need of a fire quickly shavings work just as well as fuzz sticks and are quicker and easier to make .... and all you need is something to gather them on whilst "whittling away" ....

Lacking a "third arm" I cannot do photo's of the task itself but after going through a few twigs alternating with each knife it does'nt take long to get what you need ....

P1010030.jpg


My impressions of the respective knives doing this task are that the finer edge on the NMSFNO had it an easy winner .... plus I liked the comfort of choking up on the blade using the rounded choil and spine .... the NM treatment on these blades really comes to the "fore" in tasks like this.

The FSH was certainly still comfortable doing this task ... the thick spine and choil make for good resting points and the width ensures than nothing is "biting" into your thumb or forefinger ... and had the edge been reprofiled a little and thinned out I am sure it would have been a closer call .... but in "stock" form it still did well at the task as the edge was sharp although the obtuse angle on the edge meant that the curls were more like "angular" splits than might otherwise be the case if you have a more acute edge which enables thinner slices to be shaved... not that it matters radically when burning them ... but it can matter when looking for that first "spark" to take and making the transition from a "smoulder" to a "flame" ....

In doing this task one of the things I noted was that working with a choked grip and your thumb on the spine means that the "depth" of the blade plays an important part as to the "finesse" with which you can "cut" .... basically the less depth you have the better you gain "control" .... this is why I quite like a Khukri design as working close to the grip on a khukri gives a lot of "control" for a knife as large as it is .... however I did'nt want to go back in and bring the Zilla out to compare with these two knives .... but I did think it would be interesting to go back in and bring out the Basic 9 ... this has a thinner depth profile and I was interested to see how this compared with the others ....

P1010031.jpg


Sure enough the Basic 9 did great at this task and the sharp ASM edge worked a treat ... thumb control from the spine grip was a lot more "receptive" and you could feel the "pressure" of the cut a lot better ... and you can see why a blade profile like this is popular amongst "users" of knives for field work. There is'nt a "radical" difference though ... the NMSFNO was certainly able to do some "fine" work but when the temperature is cold and your hands are cold it is noticeable. I dare say that is perhaps why the Finn's have a similar size and style of blade on their Leku knives as when it get's severely cold and you are working with gloves or mitts this would become more critical. I did'nt bring out a SAR8 but I would expect the same would hold true with it....so having brought the Basic 9 out the overall winner on this task went to it :thumbup:

Next task was to do some "batoning" to get some dry inner wood for sticks ... I started out using the Basic 9 as this was "to hand" so to speak.
I used the two sections of a limb I had sawn through with a Laplander saw on an earlier review ....

P1010005.jpg


The flat "sawn" section made it easier to see the run of the grain to line the knife up on so that the split would be a bit easier. I did'nt want to go looking for a baton and to be fair I hardly ever use a baton... I tend to line up the knife cetrally on the side of the log with the grain and make a "press cut" to get the edge to "bite" and then just bang the log and knife down on a hard surface.... usually a flat stone ... I don't like chopping into the log whilst holding the log .... bad injuries come from doing that .... especially if the log has been chopped with a knife or axe and is tapered .... it is easy to glance off ... better to line the knife up and use a baton then and rest the log on a hard surface .... but I find it quicker to cut into the log when it is rested on a hard surface pushing down in a controlled manner to get the edge to bite ... each to their own so long as it's safe ...

The Basic 9 weighing in at only 14 oz's is still a good splitting knife ... at .25 thick and with a thin depth of blade it has a very good "V" wedge effect ...I did these sticks with it ...

P1010032.jpg


The FSH with the heaviest weight at 23 oz's did the splitting the easiest .... it whalloped through the log ....

P1010034.jpg


and the NMSFNO at 21 oz's was no slouch either ...

P1010036.jpg
 
So having done a bit more log splitting using each knife the main bulk of what was needed was ready ....

P1010035.jpg


Once the fire was going I figured I could add the odd wet branch or two and they would dry out on the fire .... the next task was getting a fire started and seeing how the knives worked with a fire steel ....

To prep the fire I found a spare slate roof tile to act as a base for the fire and give a dry area to try and get the tinder to catch ....

P1010037.jpg


Now I know many probably think that if you want to use a firesteel why not simply use a hacksaw blade "striker" or why not simply use a plastic disposable lighter ... :D Well fair enough if you are in need of a fire and know you are going to make one there is no need to make life harder for yourself ... but personally I like to have with a knife which is going to be with me in the hills the means to get a fire going ... it makes for an all round ability to look after yourself if you just have your knife with you .... and so I often have on my sheaths a fire steel ... besides ... if it were not for looking at how best to use a knife and what they "can do" there would be very little to chose between these ... as so far they have all easily accomplished the tasks needed.

Now looking at the designs of the knives it becomes apparent that the NMSFNO has no easy striking area for a steel except the main edge which fair enough in an emergency I would use but I don't want to damage the edge unecessarily ... so unless you were to flatten the choil a little to get the ferro rod to "bite" or perhaps flatten a small section of the spine near the tip so that there was a right angled edge to use as a strike area you would struggle with this design to find an alternative edge to use ...

Personally I think the NM choils are one of the nicest most comfortable features of this knife so I don't see modifying the choil to a right angle as the answer ... and I like the asthetics of the knife as is and am reluctant to change this so for me I guess with this blade I would carry a striker and attach this to the sheath ... probably by wrapping some para cord round the sheath near the fitment to slide the striker into ....

The Basic 9's design does enable a good strike point using the choil ... it has a very good right angled edge and can throw good sparks with the size of the choil being almost a perfect fit for the fire steel .... so this knife passes on this aspect ....

The FSH Variant though has by far the best option with it's serrated clip .... this can throw a real shower of sparks and given that I only needed to light the fire the once .... this was the knife I chose to use ....

P1010040.jpg


The weather being so wet recently though the ability to get a spark to catch on some of the shavings was proving impossible .... I did get one or two to catch but could'nt get the flame to last long enough to build a fire from ....once the curls had burned off the fuzz sticks the main stick would'nt catch .... so in the end I used some loose wool from my improvised fingerless mittens as these were and still are continously "fraying" .... ( I really need to get a needle and thread to these to stitch the wool to the inner lining ... and should have done so ages ago ... but the wool fraying is nicely useful for "tinder" :thumbup:) ....

P1010039.jpg


Once I got this burning the shavings started to burn and I managed to get a fire going ...

P1010044.jpg


It took a good while to actually get the fire to properly burn .... it was "smouldering" for ages by which time it was starting to turn dark ... but eventually it was blazing away .... and I managed to get a brew going for a cup of tea ....

P1010048.jpg


and once burning well you could add snapped wet sticks to the fire and they would dry and keep the fire going more easily ....

P1010047.jpg


So to conclude on the test .... I think the FSH had two wins on log splitting and fire lighting ... then the Basic 9 with a win on the tinder preperation and was good on all the others .... closely followed by the NMSFNO which was good on all tests save for being unable to have a sharp edge for a fire steel ... but in many ways it's smooth edges are also it's strengths ... so for me any of these three knives would make a great Camp Knife/ Do it All blade ... and that is the difficulty I have with my Busse Collection .... when they all work well "Survival Skills" are "easy" in comparison to picking which knife to do it with ....:D
 
Last edited:
Well Peter... you should be the Official Busse Salesman for Europe. :thumbup:
:)
 
Great review thus far Peter, your really good at explaining and very thought out explanations of what your doing and the going on's of your different knife tests. :thumbup:
Thanks for sharing and great photo's. :cool:
 
Well Peter... you should be the Official Busse Salesman for Europe. :thumbup:
:)

Definitely Peter !!! Let's keep them here in Europe. I don't know if you sell your INFI, I mean not the particular models in this thread, but INFI generally, but I would like to buy some from you.

The main reason is high custom tax in my country.
 
Well Peter... you should be the Official Busse Salesman for Europe. :thumbup:
:)

Works for me ...:thumbup: Getting my tax back on my collection would be a cracking start .... then being able to claim to go to Knob Creek and Blade as pre tax expenses .... it's all looking good :thumbup::D:D
 
Making a fire in the wet, in the U.K., who'd have thought?
Thanks Peter, a great review and practical test for us all.
Best Regards,
Woody
 
very well put together review and how to.:thumbup: thank's for taking the time to type all that.:)
 
Pete, I agree w/everone else in that you FSH-V is one of the best V's out there. I remember when you got it and it's soooowweeetttt!!!!! Great report and eval, but you really do bring to light the NM style knife and no right angles for striking. HUM back to a striker steel on a sheath then if packing a NM type blade. Real good point there Bro!!!
**Thanks**
 
Nice. :D

Everything did look to be very wet, good job getting that fire going. :)

I usually bring a little charcoal with me if it's really wet just in case it's too wet. (A trick I learned a long time ago)
 
Hey Peter, you ever use one of those Magnesium fire starters that you shave little pieces off of. And how do they compare with the one you use. Thanks,
 
Yes I have used them ... as tinder goes they can burn very hot but quite fast ... I tend to use slow burning tinder which can make for a longer lasting ember ... they do work well though with strips of inner tube rubber so I have heard ... put the scrappings on the rubber strip and when they catch so does the rubber ... it can burn well even in the rain ... I tend to go more for a simple fire steel though as they are a little less bulky to add to a sheath .... that type of starter though would work well in a "tin kit" or maybe a pouch on the sheath.
 
Yes I have used them ... as tinder goes they can burn very hot but quite fast ... I tend to use slow burning tinder which can make for a longer lasting ember ... they do work well though with strips of inner tube rubber so I have heard ... put the scrappings on the rubber strip and when they catch so does the rubber ... it can burn well even in the rain ... I tend to go more for a simple fire steel though as they are a little less bulky to add to a sheath .... that type of starter though would work well in a "tin kit" or maybe a pouch on the sheath.

Thanks Peter, I was curious I can see where your firesteel would be less cumbersome though. :thumbup:
 
Back
Top