I thought everyone would get a kick out of this testimony from a 1986 Florida burglary trial. At issue in the case was whether the 3-inch "buck knife" lockback in the defendant's pocket was a "common pocketknife" exempt from Florida's definition of a dangerous weapon:
And here we all thought that a lock was a safety feature!
Suffice to say that Florida court's have since interpreted the law to make it clear that the above described knife is a common pocketknife exempt from the dangerous weapon law. Bunkley's 1986 conviction was recently back in the courts on the much less interesting issue of retroactivity of that later interpretation. If anyone cares, Bunkley lost and remains in jail for life for his "dangerous weapon" offense (don't cry too hard, he had 14 prior burglary convictions).
The officer said that the blade, which folded into the handle, was about two-and-one-half to three inches long. The officer testified further that Bunkley's knife blade locked in the open position. The officer explained how this feature distinguished it from a common pocketknife:
"It's a locked blade, which makes it a dangerous weapon for the simple fact that an average pocketknife, if you stick something with it and you're not very good at what you do, the blade will close. The pocketknife has that safety feature, that it will close. This blade will not close unless you push down very hard on this spring."
And here we all thought that a lock was a safety feature!
Suffice to say that Florida court's have since interpreted the law to make it clear that the above described knife is a common pocketknife exempt from the dangerous weapon law. Bunkley's 1986 conviction was recently back in the courts on the much less interesting issue of retroactivity of that later interpretation. If anyone cares, Bunkley lost and remains in jail for life for his "dangerous weapon" offense (don't cry too hard, he had 14 prior burglary convictions).