Cobalt
Platinum Member
- Joined
- Dec 23, 1998
- Messages
- 17,709
THERE IS NO SUBSTITUTE FOR CUBIC INCHES!!
This is an old muscle car saying. The more motor you had, the faster you went. When I had my 389 c.i. , 1966 goat, I went fast. When I got my 400 c.i. RAIV goat, I went faster yet and when I got my 440 magnum 1970 challenger I went faster still. So what the hell does this have to do with knives?
Well in knives I have allways searched for the toughest, strongest possible. But there isn't many who like to make beefy knives. In the manufactured knife field Cold steel leads the pack with the Trailmaster and Recon Scout, these are miniature tanks at 5/16 inch thick. Gerber has a little known Bowie that is also 5/16 and supposed to be excellent. Then there are many offerings in 1/4 inch and just as many in 3/16 inch.
To top it off, most custom makers use 3/16 thick steel, stating that it is plenty tough, lighter and holds an edge better.
Then you have types of materials used. Hiteck. alloys, hiteck steels, forging, rolled, damascus, san mai, etc. Some feel that they can go thinner with stronger alloys or laminates, so they get an excellent alloy and make the knife in 3/16 stock, same goes for the laminates. These knives bend easily usually if they have blades greater than 7 inches long.
So I'm still not getting to the point. Well, the thicker the blade the stiffer it is for it's length. For example I have a few CS knives in 3/16. They are the SRK and Recon Tanto. If I try to flex them, the SRK is almost unnoticeable in it's flex, while the Recon Tanto flexes a bit more due to it's slightly longer blade of 7 inches. Both knives are guite stiff. I now go with a larger bowie, with the same thickness and a 9.5 inch blade. That blade flexed so much I thought it would break. I guess that extra couple of inches in length made the difference in the applied felt force. The only cure for this is extra thickness. A large 9 ibch knife of 1/4 inch thickness has always been stiff. But if you can, why not go for more, say 5/16, say 6/16 or even 7/16. And if you make it longer go thicker, what a novel Idea. VIOLA, H.I khukuri.
I was thinking, about the people on this forum arguing that the Ang Khola is to heavy and that the BAS is too light(at least to me). But the fact is that all these blades are thicker than anything else available on the market. Even the BAS at 3/8 inch thick.
You will see many custom makers not wanting to make knives thicker than 3/16 because they feel this is plenty strong enough. I disagree. If you make a knife you term survival, then this means that it may end up being your only tool, ie. shovel, ice pick, axe, machete, pry bar,can opener, skinner, spear, etc.
If you look on other forums you will see people complaining that a little 1/4 inch 12 inch long knife being tooooooo heavy. They always quote weight as being important. But what are we talking about here? A 1/4 of a pound? Give me a break like that is a big deal. I go on long hikes with over 60 pounds in a ruck sack. I go running 7 miles every other day with my 15 inch A.K. in my hand.
Sorry, but I'm willing to take that extra 1/4 pound or so for the strength it will give me. So the next time your thinking, should I go 3/16 or 1/4 in my survival knife, think about how many knife pieces you want to return with. Of course any of the H.I. khukuri's are thivker than any knife made and are heavier also, but they are worth it in my opinion.
Hey, if the little Ghurka at 5'4" can carry a big knife why can't anyone else.
Make mine thick!! and THERE IS NO SUBSTITUTE FOR CUBIC INCHES.
Just more of my rantings!!!
This is an old muscle car saying. The more motor you had, the faster you went. When I had my 389 c.i. , 1966 goat, I went fast. When I got my 400 c.i. RAIV goat, I went faster yet and when I got my 440 magnum 1970 challenger I went faster still. So what the hell does this have to do with knives?
Well in knives I have allways searched for the toughest, strongest possible. But there isn't many who like to make beefy knives. In the manufactured knife field Cold steel leads the pack with the Trailmaster and Recon Scout, these are miniature tanks at 5/16 inch thick. Gerber has a little known Bowie that is also 5/16 and supposed to be excellent. Then there are many offerings in 1/4 inch and just as many in 3/16 inch.
To top it off, most custom makers use 3/16 thick steel, stating that it is plenty tough, lighter and holds an edge better.
Then you have types of materials used. Hiteck. alloys, hiteck steels, forging, rolled, damascus, san mai, etc. Some feel that they can go thinner with stronger alloys or laminates, so they get an excellent alloy and make the knife in 3/16 stock, same goes for the laminates. These knives bend easily usually if they have blades greater than 7 inches long.
So I'm still not getting to the point. Well, the thicker the blade the stiffer it is for it's length. For example I have a few CS knives in 3/16. They are the SRK and Recon Tanto. If I try to flex them, the SRK is almost unnoticeable in it's flex, while the Recon Tanto flexes a bit more due to it's slightly longer blade of 7 inches. Both knives are guite stiff. I now go with a larger bowie, with the same thickness and a 9.5 inch blade. That blade flexed so much I thought it would break. I guess that extra couple of inches in length made the difference in the applied felt force. The only cure for this is extra thickness. A large 9 ibch knife of 1/4 inch thickness has always been stiff. But if you can, why not go for more, say 5/16, say 6/16 or even 7/16. And if you make it longer go thicker, what a novel Idea. VIOLA, H.I khukuri.
I was thinking, about the people on this forum arguing that the Ang Khola is to heavy and that the BAS is too light(at least to me). But the fact is that all these blades are thicker than anything else available on the market. Even the BAS at 3/8 inch thick.
You will see many custom makers not wanting to make knives thicker than 3/16 because they feel this is plenty strong enough. I disagree. If you make a knife you term survival, then this means that it may end up being your only tool, ie. shovel, ice pick, axe, machete, pry bar,can opener, skinner, spear, etc.
If you look on other forums you will see people complaining that a little 1/4 inch 12 inch long knife being tooooooo heavy. They always quote weight as being important. But what are we talking about here? A 1/4 of a pound? Give me a break like that is a big deal. I go on long hikes with over 60 pounds in a ruck sack. I go running 7 miles every other day with my 15 inch A.K. in my hand.
Sorry, but I'm willing to take that extra 1/4 pound or so for the strength it will give me. So the next time your thinking, should I go 3/16 or 1/4 in my survival knife, think about how many knife pieces you want to return with. Of course any of the H.I. khukuri's are thivker than any knife made and are heavier also, but they are worth it in my opinion.
Hey, if the little Ghurka at 5'4" can carry a big knife why can't anyone else.
Make mine thick!! and THERE IS NO SUBSTITUTE FOR CUBIC INCHES.
Just more of my rantings!!!