Normal Strider SNG compared to CC?

[Lims]

I was wondering if anyone could give me some advise as to how the SnG CC strider handles compare to a standard SnG. Ok, so obviously it is smaller, but by how much? How do they feel in hand? Or better still, does anyone happen to own both and have pictures of both in hand for comparison?

I would say my hands are med-small and I would hate to shell out that much money only to find either one didn't feel comfortable to hold.

 

[John T Wylie Jr]

They are not smaller , but a bit thinner and more ergo feeling on the CC version. The main diff is rather than the TI and G10 side being flat , they are more rounded , similar to the grip panels on a 1911

 

[Matador]

Regular on top, CC on the bottom. BTW, these are SMF's. SnG's will run smaller in width and length, but proportions are similar. Next pic a DDC SnG CC next to a SMF CC. I also have med/small hands and the SnG in any handle configuration fit the bill. I keep just one DDC SnG CC and it's a great one! I just prefer the bigger brother SMF as an overall edc.

Matador-

 

[creativeoutlethobbie]

CC is thinner in width than the standard. I think the CC is to slick to hold. I prefer the DGG of them all.

 

[colubrid]

CC is thinner in width than the standard. I think the CC is to slick to hold. I prefer the DGG of them all.

I agree the CC version is to slick and the sharper edges dig into my hands. The ergos on the standard SNG feels 100% better. I prefer the standard even though I carry both.