NOt UFO, but interesting

Why we're not just shooting theese from a ground position and bouncing them off Satellites I don't know. A lot less risk of loss, and a lot less $.
 
so thats why president Ahmadinejad of iran has had his armoured car mirror tiled.
356%20bumper%20detail.JPG
 
I'm sure we will find some way to let the Chinese get ahold of this technology real soon.
Terry
 
Why we're not just shooting theese from a ground position and bouncing them off Satellites I don't know. A lot less risk of loss, and a lot less $.

Maybe the aliens could help us with this. :p
 
Why we're not just shooting theese from a ground position and bouncing them off Satellites I don't know. A lot less risk of loss, and a lot less $.

Andy,

You're going to have to change your last name to Bull, as in Gerald Bull, master of the super gun.
 
There is no new technology. We just packed up the enormous mass of equipment onto a plane. The technology is old. The plane is slow. The idea is dumb. Until they can get this equipment smaller it won't do any good mounted to a plane.
 
Actually, this is a new system, Andy. Somehow they got rid of the CO2 system they needed previously. It is smaller and lighter. (I dont know how much)
 
Boeing is working on stuff well ahead of what anyone knows, let alone trade journals. I remember walking around the then prototype PaveHawk in a hanger at Moses Lake , WA (Former Larson AFB) eight years before it was introduced. The nighthawk was flying 10 years before formally announced and moved to the 49th FW (my old stomping grounds).
 
Uh oh, someone is confirming the fact that the govt (and its contractors) DO keep secrets concerning aerospace concepts...
Some people would have us believe that such practices are impossible and laughable.
 
Why we're not just shooting theese from a ground position and bouncing them off Satellites I don't know. A lot less risk of loss, and a lot less $.

Atmospheric dispersion. I'm not sure that anyone can currently build a laser powerful enough to penetrate the atmosphere twice while still delivering a useful amount of energy to the target. The effectiveness of this system would also hinge upon having a satellite available to bounce the laser, and no one shooting that satellite down. Mounting it in an aircraft allows one to bring the laser to the target, simplifying targeting and making it possible for a significantly less powerful laser to be employed.

Interesting device they're making here but I'm not sure what they'll be able to do with it. A 300 kW laser, even at ranges closer than what this will be used at, won't do much to any armored vehicle or reinforced structure with a mere five second pulse. The wording makes it sound to me as if this will be primarily used against soft targets -- i.e., individual people and maybe the odd civilian vehicle, in a crowd. In any other situation there's a lower tech solution that's far less expensive and less risky.
 
In addition to the issue Dave mentioned re: travelling at that way through the atmosphere, the next problem is what do you make your reflector out of, and how do you send someone up there to windex it?

Since it's not possible to make a perfect reflector, some of the beam's energy gets transferred to the 'mirror'. If you're using a beam with enough energy to cook a tank/missile/whatever then you need a reflector which is tough enough to take that heat.

But what happens when your mirror picks up some heat from the beam? It starts changing shape a teensy bit. So as the mirror warms up, it will reflect the beam slightly differently... and anyone who's fired a gun over long range can see how this is a problem when your range is from the earth into space and back again.

And the crack about windex? Yeah, there's dust in space. The more dust on your mirror, the more heat it absorbs... etc.

Don't forget the added complexity of firing a laser from the surface of the earth (which is rotating one way) to hit a satellite (probably rotating another way) in order to hit something which is also moving around...

Oh sure, there are ways to beat these problems. But people won't give you money to do that until you've proven it will work the 'simple' way. :)

(TBH mounting it on a herc isn't the simplest way of doing it either, but it's a hell of a lot cheaper and easier to 'sell' when you're done.)
 
Back
Top