Now what to do?

Congrats on the MEaner --- it's one of my all time favorite Busses.

Welcome to the addiction -- you'll be poor VERY soon...
 
Ahhhhh yes, yet again I get to watch another one slip into the addiction that has crack, heroin, and tobacco beat hands down. You poor poor soul...don't bother trying to find another knife to replace Busse with, you won't....don't try to leave, you'll be back.....don't try to cut up your CC, you'll get new ones, NO my poor friend you have slipped into the wonderful deep and blissful Black Hole of INFI....Enjoy the Ride!!! :eek: :D :cool:
 
It's over. Soon, you'll have no money and one of these...

PileII.jpg
 
enix said:
Guyon: you are my american idol.
Click to expand...

There are a couple of HOGs here that have misplaced more INFI than that. Heck there's one guy with a single piece that weighs as much as that pile. I think Guyon may be an example of restraint.

Stick around a little and you'll see what I mean.
 
Ten megapixels? In terms of posting to forums, a full ten-megapixel photo is far from ideal, due to its pixel size. My Nikon D200 (and D80, which is my lightweight backup Digitial SLR) make 3884x2600 pixel NEF (aka, RAW) images. That's what I work in. When making minor adjustments, the more megapixels you have to work with, the better. But, when posting to forums, a good amount of scaling is necessary. Scaling also means that corrective sharpening should be applied. The photo below was taken at 3884x2600 resolution in NEF, but what you see below has been scaled to 1000x669 pixels, which is two-thirds of only one megapixel.

fat-cgfbm-desertsage-1.jpg


In terms of what to do, there is no known cure. In fact, what you have is highly contagious. Friends and co-workers are likely to become infected, which will serve to make the acquisition of INFI more difficult. We know this, which explains why we snap them up with little or no hesitation.
 
lunde said:
Ten megapixels? In terms of posting to forums, a full ten-megapixel photo is far from ideal, due to its pixel size. My Nikon D200 (and D80, which is my lightweight backup Digitial SLR) make 3884x2600 pixel NEF (aka, RAW) images. That's what I work in. When making minor adjustments, the more megapixels you have to work with, the better. But, when posting to forums, a good amount of scaling is necessary. Scaling also means that corrective sharpening should be applied. The photo below was taken at 3884x2600 resolution in NEF, but what you see below has been scaled to 1000x669 pixels, which is two-thirds of only one megapixel.

fat-cgfbm-desertsage-1.jpg


In terms of what to do, there is no known cure. In fact, what you have is highly contagious. Friends and co-workers are likely to become infected, which will serve to make the acquisition of INFI more difficult. We know this, which explains why we snap them up with little or no hesitation.
Click to expand...

HOLY PHOTO KNOWLEDGE BATMAN :eek: That is a beauty and I should know cause I have one :D What you need to know is everything you have been warned of is soon to be arranged neatly in your home! YOUR HOME, WHERE YOU COME TO PLAY WITH YOUR TOYS :D (circa Seinfeld) Welcome to INFIAHOLICS, Hi I am Scott!!! :thumbup:
 
I was wondering if that Sage FBM is out of scale now that it is adjusted to fit the screen?
It may be an illusion, but it looks off to me.
 
steelnut said:
I was wondering if that Sage FBM is out of scale now that it is adjusted to fit the screen?
It may be an illusion, but it looks off to me.
Click to expand...

It's the angle (perspective) from which the photo was taken.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top