Oakley X-Metal

Joined
Oct 6, 1998
Messages
2,269
I thought paying $275 for a pair of sunglasses was just too expensive then I realized that I was paying more than that for knives. I ended up taking the plunge and got a pair of Oakley Romeos. I'm glad I did. They're awesome. Anyone else have a pair of the X-Metal line?
 
I agree that all Oakleys are expensive, but I got hooked on the habit a long time before I got the custom knife bug.

I have a pair of Ruby Juliets (can anybody say X-Men?) - these are great shade.

Regards,

Ed

PS Should I also admit to having a pair of 24K XX Metals? These are real good with a suit if you wish to wind up your fellow workers....
 
I got my juliets in fire w/ presciption lenses.
Great looking & even better optics !!!
 
I've got some A-wires and C-wires. Like 'em. They look cool and fit well (adjustable nose pieces, temples, etc).

Oakley makes very good optics. And I haven't studied their product line...they may have "higher end" lenses than what come in A and C-wires. With that caveat in mind...

If you want to step up in terms of clarity and resolution, try the Maui Jim optics. It isn't so much the polarization (which is a legitimate benefit when there is much reflected light, particularly off water, e.g. fishing/water sports, etc) that makes then great, just clarity of the glass. And polarized lenses are a mixed bag... oversold, overrated in my book. They can completely block liquid crystal displays from your eyes (e.g. on my old cell phone, and some car stereo's. LCD's clearly use polarized light technology as their display medium), and I have tinted windows on my car that, along w/ polarized lenses, causes these freaky rainbow distortions. Kinda psychedelic ... Shagadelic Baby, yeeYAYahh (Austin Powers).

The top of the heap, up one notch even from Maui Jim, is Revo.. These lenses are just outrageously good. And they are priced that way (upper $100 to lower $200). You don't realize it so much trying them on in a shop....you notice it once you step outside and wear them for an hour or so... even more so over a few days, outdoors. It is hard to explain, but... optical purity is excellent, such that even though they are dark (only transmit say 6% of light), the resolution is so good I don't have to tilt them down to study detail say in the shadows. They can be "dark" and protective while not obfuscating detail. Resolution is th word...sharpness, clarity. All that.

By comparison, you can tell Oakley is not as pure. This is subtle, but the Oakley's just don't transmit the same resolution...they is subtle "scatter" that just kinda fuzzes up things compared to Revo.

Downside, Revo only has a few designs, not nearly so many cool ones as Oakley. For me, it's substance over style when I care how well I see outdoors (biking, fishing, vacations/touring, etc)... so I choose the Revo's in those conditions. Usually, the Oakley's are dandy and they look better (vanity and all). :cool:

I wear contacts from noon onward during the day, so wear shades w/ contacts.

But I wear my glasses in the morning, etc. If you wear regular glasses, try a new prescription with Zeiss lenses. They have a very high optical index, meaning they will bend light for high prescriptions with a thinner glass lens than others. More, they are like Revo's...just superduper clean, clear, sharp, resolution again. Best I've had, hands-down. German quality, and noticeably worth the extra dinero.

(that's me in my A-wires in the Avatar. Yeeeah, right ;) )
 
I still have my original Titanium T-wires. With the old Coffin metal case. Cost me $350 a few years back but are still in perfect condition.

ED
 
I pack both X-metals Romeo and Juliet in Gold and Black Iridium. Gunning for the XX in 24k... Funny thing though, the iridium lenses tend to delaminate over here in Malaysia.. :( Had to send them back the service and warranty pretty often!

Sam
 
What about Vuarnet? I used them for many years before the last pair fell off my head while I was sitting on the top row of a Sears Point Racetrack bleachers. I was looking up at a water tanker aircraft that was on the way to the Oakland fire to dump a load. I have not replaced them but I sure miss them. They cut glare and gave detail to "flat light" conditions while skiing.

bob
 
Nobody's more obsessed with gadgets than I am. I just can't get my mind around that much money for sunglasses. What am I missing here? I wore a pair of Oakley's for a round of golf, belonged to a friend, I couldn't tell any difference in them from my Bolle glasses.

What is it you guys find different between the high dollar stuff and the $100 stuff? I feel like I am missing out on something.
 
I have the Juliet's with Blue lenses, and just got a pair of black framed Zero's (very lightweight). Love both and want some more....
woody
 
Bigcozy, that was exactly how I felt when I first saw the Romeos back in '98. What made me decide to finally get a pair was the fact that I'm a gadget freak, too. The process of creating an X-Metal frame lends "high speed, low drag" appeal to the sunglasses.
 
The only problem I found with the X-metals is that they do not work with a full-face motorcycle helmet (the arms are not flexible enough so it is very difficult to put them on).
But, my M-frames work great, and I can choose between three different lenses according to weather conditions: Red iridium for bright sunlight, VR-28 for overcast with occasional bursts of sun, and Yellow for fog and night.
 
Originally posted by bigcozy
I wore a pair of Oakley's for a round of golf, belonged to a friend, I couldn't tell any difference in them from my Bolle glasses.

What is it you guys find different between the high dollar stuff and the $100 stuff? I feel like I am missing out on something.

Optically, the Bolle's and Vuarnet's are good quality, about the same as Oakley.

I really think you have to step up to Maui Jim or another notch up to Revo to notice a big optical difference.

Oakley's forte IMHO is:
1. having lots of cool stylie stuff. Style/looks, and you can search around and find something that you can adjust to fit your particular face.
2. and in the sport shields area, some great fitting, wraparound stuff that gives you great coverage peripherally (keeps light out of the sides) and top/middle (lens extends unimpeded between your eyes, which helps when riding a bike and hunched over with eyes looking somewhat out the top of the glasses sometimes).

Worth the money? Is a Sebenza worth the premium over a Benchmade 750?

I bought two pairs of Oakley's used and that was the right discount for me. Paid retail for Revo's and would again. I don't get much benefit from Polarized, and there are a couple drawbacks that would aim me away from Maui and towards Revo.

Anyone found a true discount seller for Oakley's?
I get the feeling they don't allow discounting in their distribution chain...
 
My first (several years ago) pair of Oakleys was a clear-frame +Red Iridium lens M-Frame. I got it from Sams Club for SRP less $20-30. Soon afterwards, I learned (online) that Sams Club was able to offer this discount by selling "gray-market" sunglasses. Although Oakley blacklisted dealers who sold at a discount, they'd have to find out about it first to cut off their supply. A common occurrence was a dealer (usually a bike shop) going out of business (thus not caring about continued good relations with Oakley), buying a shipment of Oakleys, and selling it to Sams Club.

A few years ago, Costco carried M-Frames that were packaged in a way to suggest supply from Oakley that was on the up-and-up. These were black (non-Iridium) Strike lens, black folding frame. My guess is that Oakley was trying to get rid of old-style M-Frames (as opposed to the new style which more closely resembles the Pro frame) and get some market penetration in the deal.

When I went looking for a Clear Sweep lens, I had a difficult time as the sunglass shops and bike stores had fairly small inventories (dunno if this has always been the case). I eventually ordered direct from Oakley's O-Store, which points out that Oakley is maintaining its control of its products.
 
Back
Top