munk said:
It is not a 'witchhunt' for a community of people who where lied to by an individual to acknowledge the truth.
By using the word 'witchhunt' to describe that commuinity taking awareness, the moral truth is lost and the evil assigned to good people. That is a distortion and overreaction.
Mr. Ness pulled the wool over a good man's eyes, Bill's. But not ours, and not Yangdu's. We are moving on. My only question about this thread was why bother? People must have felt wronged still, for this to come up. That is an acceptable way to feel- I can understand that, can't we all? Our Armed forces are disgraced by an imposter.
What is a bigger disgrace is for anyone to attempt to shame good people for natural outrage.
munk
No one need feel shamed if they disagree with my assessment of a situation. I have been wrong many times before.
It is interesting to note that when Munk’s real name was posted in the thread at
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=398109&page=2 , post 54 , it was promptly removed with the comment “
My legal name edited out of this post.”
In this thread a link was posted to a website where not only the name of a previous forumite, but also his:
Photographs
Phone numbers
Address
Social security number
Scans of identity documents
Family member’s name
Family members address
Description of family properties
were posted, apparently without the ex-forumite’s consent. The post was commented on by moderators but the information link was not removed by them. Apparently a distinction was drawn between the case where personal information was removed and the one where it was allowed to stay. (It has now been removed from this thread by the original poster himself. )
Disseminating this information on the HI forum appears particularly problematic when a number of forumites have expressed negative feelings related to perceived false claims of military service. What if an angry reader were to use the personal information provided here to cause harm?
A large Fortune 500 corporation recently lost control of thousands of records containing names and SSNs of employees. The response was to purchase 3 years of financial monitoring services for all the affected employees. I’m not certain, but I’m pretty sure the expenditure was motivated more by concern of tort liability and protection of deep pockets than charity. Bladeforums does not have such deep pockets, and the personal information was only linked to from here. Nonetheless it would be interesting to hear what the legal scholars on the forum have to say about possible concerns with disseminating such information on the forum.
I understand the moderator positions, posted above, that the individual whose information was briefly disseminated in this thread has disgraced the US military, and that the “outing” of his personal information was necessary. It is interesting to note that Munk has declared above that my post was even more disgraceful than the actions of the banned and “outed” individual.