- Joined
- May 2, 2003
- Messages
- 143
one was done by bura and the other was done by Kumar Bishwakarma
they seem like two totally different knives. which is to be expected bcs they are handmade. The only identifier that lets me know they are chiruwa is their size and the split handles.
--------------------------------
Other than that they look and feel like two different knives:
Blade: bura's blade is pointier and wider at the belly (thus a little bit heavier. Both are the same thickness
The handle: Bura's is a smaller grip and made of horn. Bishawaka's is made of wood and is a wider grip.
pommel shape: Buras is ovaloid and Bishwakarma is oval.
When it all adds up Bishwakarma's blade seems liek a "faster" knife. The thick grip allows me to get more tork and more leverage. That coupled with a the slightly slenderer blade design makes me feel as though i can swing it faster. However i knoow bura is the master blade smith so who am i to judge.
---------------------------------
the only disappointment that i have (which i know isnt really a big deal) is that one of the blades is a horn handle (bura) and the other is wood (bishwakarma).
I feel guilty giving my older brother a different khuk than mine (bcs one of them is a gift other is for me)... he probably wont care much... but i will admit that I do slightly... I dont care enough that its worth doing anything about though.
overall these blades look and feel amazing... im very excited to test one of them (havent decided which one im gonna give to my older brother yet)
How do I know which one is better for me? what characteristics should I be looking for to know which one is better for me?
they seem like two totally different knives. which is to be expected bcs they are handmade. The only identifier that lets me know they are chiruwa is their size and the split handles.
--------------------------------
Other than that they look and feel like two different knives:
Blade: bura's blade is pointier and wider at the belly (thus a little bit heavier. Both are the same thickness
The handle: Bura's is a smaller grip and made of horn. Bishawaka's is made of wood and is a wider grip.
pommel shape: Buras is ovaloid and Bishwakarma is oval.
When it all adds up Bishwakarma's blade seems liek a "faster" knife. The thick grip allows me to get more tork and more leverage. That coupled with a the slightly slenderer blade design makes me feel as though i can swing it faster. However i knoow bura is the master blade smith so who am i to judge.
---------------------------------
the only disappointment that i have (which i know isnt really a big deal) is that one of the blades is a horn handle (bura) and the other is wood (bishwakarma).
I feel guilty giving my older brother a different khuk than mine (bcs one of them is a gift other is for me)... he probably wont care much... but i will admit that I do slightly... I dont care enough that its worth doing anything about though.
overall these blades look and feel amazing... im very excited to test one of them (havent decided which one im gonna give to my older brother yet)
How do I know which one is better for me? what characteristics should I be looking for to know which one is better for me?