Old Boker pearl handled oval penknife

Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
3,355
It's been way too long since I checked in here but while I've got a little time I wanted to share this one with you guys. I've had it on loan from a relative for cleaning and researching its age.

cigar1.jpg


cigar5.jpg


It's just about 3 3/8" closed. Four blades - a main that I presume was originally a spear point, two pens and a file with small portion of blade at the tip.

cigar7.jpg


cigar6.jpg


All of the blades are marked with H. Boker & Co's Improved Cutlery on one side and the tree logo on the other side. The main blade has Germany stamped under the tree.

cigar2.jpg


cigar3.jpg


cigar12.jpg


The pearl is worn a bit at some of the edges but there are no significant cracks.

cigar4.jpg


cigar9.jpg


cigar10.jpg


Nice detail on one of the springs inside where it was cut to make room for the main blade. Not of necessity anymore because of how much it's been sharpened down.

cigar8.jpg


The feature of greatest interest to me is the center bolster. I'm curious if it was more common on a knife of this length compared to something smaller. Perhaps it was easier and more durable to mount two shorter pieces of pearl per side than one longer one?

cigar11.jpg


There's some nice color to the pearl as well.

cigar13.jpg


cigar14.jpg


cigar15.jpg


The reference material I've looked at indicates 1891 as a "no earlier than" date based on the Germany mark. There was a stretch of time where Boker was simultaneously using the H. Boker & Co's Improved Cutlery mark on knives made in Germany and the USA. So is the Germany mark a clear sign this knife was German-made? The tree marks have some variations among them but, generally, they look like the 1907 example. A person could go crazy trying to inspect and interpret all of branches and their orientations from one stamp to the next. :rolleyes:

I guess that covers it for now. Any comments or opinions are appreciated.
 
Wow, that's a lovely piece Nate. That 'tree' is just a bush! ;)
 
In the Boker section of my 1901 catalog there are a number of pearls with the divider, thought yours might be in there but alas it isn't. The steel pins in nickle bolsters is a dead giveaway that it's a German knife. Here are 6 German pearls, 3 with steel pins 3 with nickle pins. That's a neat old Boker.

Best regards

Robin
9701590024_34d7a0e245.jpg
[/url][/IMG]
 
Thanks guys.

Robin, is there a chance you could take a scan or picture of that catalog page? I'd be interested to see the other knives that have the center bolster.
 
Thanks guys.

Robin, is there a chance you could take a scan or picture of that catalog page? I'd be interested to see the other knives that have the center bolster.

Sorry for the bad pics, my scanner is not cooperating. Also my Flickr has decided to rotate some of the pics.:confused:The catalog is from an old Montreal hardware giant and dates from 1901 to about 1907 with added updates like seen in a couple of these pics. One of these days I'll get all the pages scanned, there are over 100 pages of knives in the catalog which is well over 1000 pages. Enjoy.

Best regards

Robin
10519867645_e68bda7c39.jpg
[/url][/IMG]
10519906584_0a34241eac.jpg
[/url][/IMG]
10520089803_9e9999f0d2.jpg
[/url][/IMG]
10519879525_3432b9be1f.jpg
[/url][/IMG]
 
Thanks very much for the images Robin. The blade selection on the knife I have matches model 1656R (same nail blade) but the handle seems to be 1646J. There's always the possibility that a blade would be popped in on a different knife where needed.
 
Hi Nate
The 1646j is 3 1/4 so is not the frame for your knife. This catalog shows all the Boker pearls in 1/4inch increments and none at 3 3/8ths. I imagine they used the same blades in a number of different frames where they fit.

Best regards

Robin
 
Great looking knife. MOP was an exotic and thus costly material in the early 1900s. German MOP knives at this time often had very long bolsters or a middle bolster (cigar band) as this allowed the makers to use smaller MOP pieces which were relatively less costly than full scales. Note the substantial differences in prices for the knives in the catalogue photos. Circa 1907 seems about right. This knife has similar tang stamps and the scales reg 1907. I hope this helps.

Nov11033.jpg
 
Well, two different rulers say the knife is definitely 3 3/8" and not 3 1/4".

Thanks for the info re: the bolsters and pearl.
 
Back
Top