One for the metallurgy aficionados

Joined
Oct 17, 2014
Messages
798
Hi everyone! I know this usually belong to general discussion but considering there is a high percentage of metallurgy enthusiasts here (I'm looking at you Cobalt!). I thought it would be nice to post it here. (If its out of place please move it to the general board. It is Jerry's home after all and I do want to respect that).


I work at a university and my field of research is carbon electronics. Which means I sometime work with carbon composites like carbon nanotube-polymer. Although I mostly work with polymers, every now and then metal-carbon composite publications appear in my radar. Yep, you guessed it, carbon steel!

Here is a few things before we get down to brass tacks:


-Woots steel used in the original damascus swords was found to have some carbon nanotube in it, an extremely strong and fiberous form of carbon. Its a bit like steel I-beams in concrete buildings it heavily reinforces the composite.

-Ancient blacksmiths astonishingly made this by trial and error over the years such as forging and smelting the steel in certain seasons etc...

-Its fabrication method however is lost to history and we don't have a documented record of how exactly it was made.


The one below (freely available from researchnet) was quite interesting so I thought it would be nice to share.

https://www.researchgate.net/profil...esa_review/links/0fcfd50b42615da658000000.pdf


What I found interesting in particular was:

-Recently, carbon nanotube has been incorporated into metals such as nickel and copper. One that is particularly interesting to us is the powder method. There are many high grade knife steel available that is made by sintering metal powder. Like elmax if I'm not mistaken. The trick is to mix these carbon nanotubes into the metal powder before sintering them to achieve good distribution. Good distribution = good homogeneous reinforcement (as I found from my own research as well). There are other methods of mixing too.

-Metals like aluminium has shown tensile strengths improvement of 129% with 5vol% of carbon nanotube addition. In the case of titanium it was 450% increase in hardness and 60% increase in elastic modulus (carbon nanotube content not published however). A substantial increase in both.

-Now this is where it gets interesting for us knife fans, wear and friction property. with 2 vol% incorporation of carbon nanotubes they reported a 83% decrease in wear volume and 60% decrease in coefficient of friction (for nickel-phosphorous-carbon nanotube coating). Again a substantial decrease in both. Cutting through those fire wood must feel a lot more lubricated if you were to have a knife made out of these!

-Corrosion rate of nickel-carbon nanotube was 5 times less to that of a pure nickel. Attributed to the inert nature of carbon nanotube and the removal of voids and pores (I've found this as well when I was making carbon nanotube-polyurethane foams, carbon nanotube is effectively a needle so it pops the bubbles). No nucleation site for corrosion = less corrosion.


Now from experience I know that its not a good idea to take anything for gospel. Even if it is a scientific publication. Some tell tale signs are the lack of details such as the concentration of carbon nanotube added to the metal on some results. However from my own experience with composites I think the logic is fairly sound. I think I'm not the only one here who would be excited if Busse made its own variant of the original damascus steel too!

Sorry for the long post, have a lovely evening everyone! :)


Bit of disclaimer:

-I'm not a metallurgist I'm drawing parallels from my composite research.

-Any science is a fair bit more than what meets the eye. Usually there are technical challenges that is not immediately apparent. Like how the carbon nanotube would react to quenching or to other impurities like chrome, sulphur and silicon.

-They have not tested it on iron so the jury is still out on that.
 
Ummm......... Jerry? Cobalt??

Jerry tells Chuck Norris his saddest drinking tales and old Chuck just cries and cries. Harnessing the tears Jerry has the base material for INFI, Chuck Norris nanotubes, the end....
 
I've seen the carbon nanotubes idea come up. I think it's interesting, and definitely worth pursuing if it makes financial sense.
 
I knew Chuck Norris was part of infi. That explains everything!

At the moment my supplier sells 10g for about 100USD (sigma aldrich). But that's small batch we're talking about. Since the discovery of using thermal decomposition to 'grow' carbon nanotubes the price fell substantially. Its already shown promising signs in terms of aerospace fuselage applications so there is incentive for the industry to make it even cheaper. I shouldn't name the company so I won't but my boss manage to sign a million USD contract with a defence company who has a daughter company that churns these things out by the drum daily so with the right set up its even dirt cheap.
 
Kaizo,

If you browse Nat Geo magazines in the 90's a Smith in the USA figured out how to make Wootz steel. I use to have a copy of the article but its lost in the ether.

It can be made by coal forge. Stay safe & have fun.
 
Nice one shunshi ;)

That gives me an idea actually smaller nanotubes makes the composite more viscous. So it might help the metal deform rather than chip...
 
I just saw this. Sorry. I am leaving for work but will try to get on and read into this. I have read about wootz many years ago. I can tell you this. Jerry answers "lets Drink" to everything but he know more about this stuff than most and never lets on about it.
 
I am certainly no metallurgist. Just an ME. There are metallurgists on this forum. But if they have not actually studied this technology they will not have a lot of input either.

The study of wootz steel has been around and as rhinoknives states, there was a guy who actually reproduced it. I remember the article, but I do not remember him discussing carbon nanno tubes. It would certainly be interesting to see what the use of carbon nanno tubes in a carbon steel does to the properties of that steel. The difference is that aluminum behaves in a completely different manner than steel. So what happens in Al, will not necessarily happen in steel and likely will not. there may be gains but there may be losses as well. Or we could find that todays steels have progressed far beyond that ancient lost tech and there is no need for it. To my knowledge no one has take on of those old wootz steel swords and destruction tested it against a modern steel like cpm3v or S7.

My understanding is that one of the men that knows the most about Wootz is Richard Furrer. He makes blades out of it and he has actually gotten original wootz sword to begin from and to study. He even bend tested one.

http://www.gizmag.com/stfc-indian-s...ail&utm_term=0_65b67362bd-f54618033a-91788073

[video=youtube;4z0v9djP_n4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4z0v9djP_n4[/video]
 
Hi Cobalt! Thanks for the reply and info! Especially the video.

Yeah I agree that you cannot directly compare what happens to aluminium to iron. What I usually do, when I do things that hasn't been done before is to look at the trend of what happens with similar materials and do an actual test. So for example I've put some carbon nanotubes in silicon based polymer and it reacted in the same manner as that of carbon polymers. Simply because the geometry of the filler was the same. So the chemistry of the host may be different but the geometry of the filler has a surprisingly amount of dominance to its behaviour. Sadly even though I have the carbon nanotubes (and sonicator to mix the iron powder with) I do not have the autoclave (there is going to be a lot of red tape for me to go through as well since carbon nanotube are a know carcinogen) but given the chance I will give it a go.

I know its ancient tech but that's the exciting thing about it. Carbon nanotube based composite has only been around since 1991 (when carbon nanotubes were first discovered). Imagine the surprise to see it being discovered in an ancient artefact! And that's why its exciting the technology is still in its foetal stage and there is much to explore. Although I must agree modern steel has come so far and there is less apparent corner to polish but I do think there is always places to improve.

Now this is where I wondered if you could very kindly let me pick your brain. From the steels you have analysed and your experience what other elements would you add to it? Of course heat treatment is the next step but I'm just trying to see if there is any mileage in it. If there is a solid case for me to lobby it to my boss then I could potentially convince him to let me have a go at it as a fun little project (or when I finally build that forge at home which I keep meaning to).

Thanks for your help! :)
 
I definitely agree with you. The viking swords have a similar history and performance myth to them. Chances are they were also woots. That knife maker should be able to answer all questions. I would think that if anyone is experimenting with CNT it would be him.
 
Brilliant, I'll give him a call in that case. Thanks again for all the info much appreciated! ;)
 
I am certainly no metallurgist. Just an ME. There are metallurgists on this forum. But if they have not actually studied this technology they will not have a lot of input either.

The study of wootz steel has been around and as rhinoknives states, there was a guy who actually reproduced it. I remember the article, but I do not remember him discussing carbon nanno tubes. It would certainly be interesting to see what the use of carbon nanno tubes in a carbon steel does to the properties of that steel. The difference is that aluminum behaves in a completely different manner than steel. So what happens in Al, will not necessarily happen in steel and likely will not. there may be gains but there may be losses as well. Or we could find that todays steels have progressed far beyond that ancient lost tech and there is no need for it. To my knowledge no one has take on of those old wootz steel swords and destruction tested it against a modern steel like cpm3v or S7.

My understanding is that one of the men that knows the most about Wootz is Richard Furrer. He makes blades out of it and he has actually gotten original wootz sword to begin from and to study. He even bend tested one.

http://www.gizmag.com/stfc-indian-s...ail&utm_term=0_65b67362bd-f54618033a-91788073

[video=youtube;4z0v9djP_n4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4z0v9djP_n4[/video]

Yes, There was another article in NG about a man that Forged Wootz, But thanks for this other, Vwey interesting and if you read the comments at the very bottom. Ted Nugent made a few comments.
 
Yes, There was another article in NG about a man that Forged Wootz, But thanks for this other, Vwey interesting and if you read the comments at the very bottom. Ted Nugent made a few comments.

Ted?,, that is funny
 
Back
Top