Ontario Spec Plus Gen II Review

Joined
Jun 16, 2006
Messages
40
ONTARIO KNIVES
SPEC PLUS GEN II
By Bill McGrath


I’ve known custom knifemaker Dan Maragni for nearly twenty years. He is one of the most knowledgeable people in the industry (Dan’s the guy who got Cold Steel to bring out their Carbon V line when most cutlery companies were promoting stainless steel blades). Recently Dan has moved from his former job at Cold Steel to a position at Ontario Knives. His first project is a complete upgrading of Ontario’s Spec Plus line. This is an affordable line of using knives with carbon steel blades and Kraton rubber grips.

Dan showed me some samples of the improved knives at the last New England Bladesmiths Guild seminar, where he and I are regular lecturers ( http://www.cashenblades.com/Ashokan.html )

He recently sent me some of these knives for testing.
Well, having now tested these knives I am quite impressed. Ontario will be offering large blades in this line with two different grinds. The flat grinds reviewed here (for maximum cutting ability) and longer camp blades with a saber grind for strength.

The steel in all the blades is 5160, hardened to 54-55 on the Rockwell C scale. The handles are made from Kraton, a hard rubber-like polymer.

Here are the knives I tested:

specplus1b.jpg


Top Left: SP-40 “Alpine” style blade (slight drop point) with aluminum butt cap (threaded on the tang for strength).Overall length 8 ⅛”, blade length 3 ¾”, thickness 0.165”

Bottom Left: SP-41 “Skene Dhu” style blade (elongated spear point) with aluminum butt cap (threaded on the tang for strength).Overall length 8 ⅛”, blade length 3 ¾”, thickness 0.165”

Top Right: SP-43 “Dirk” style blade. Overall length 13”, blade length 8”, blade thickness 3/16”

Bottom Right: SP-42 “Dirk” style blade. Overall length 12”, blade length 7”, thickness 3/16”

Here are some closeups of the blades.

specplus3.jpg


specplus2b.jpg



General impressions:

All blades are ground to a distal taper, which helps to lighten the blade and adds to its flexibility under stress. The knives come sharp enough to cleanly cut paper, but not quite shaving sharp. While the knives are of excellent quality for the price, the sheaths leave a lot to be desired. The larger sheaths are nylon with a plastic liner to keep the blade tip from poking through. However, the knives fit much too loosely in their quasi-military sheaths (they actually rattle audibly). As for the smaller knives, their sheaths are built from sheet metal in the back that wraps around the bottom of the nylon front. This should keep the tip from poking through on the 5” blades the sheaths were made for, but fall short on the 3 ¾” Gen II blades (but at least they don’t rattle). I think the smaller knives would do better in an entirely different type of sheath—perhaps a pouch type as one finds on a Finnish puukko. Dan tells me he is planning a total revamp of the sheaths next year. In the meantime, those of you who know how easy it is to make a kydex sheath, such as those who attended one of my knife making/martial arts seminars, ( go to: http://www.pekiti.com/photo-gallery.php and click "summer camp" to view samples from attendees) can make a better version for your knife in about half an hour.

specplus6.jpg


The handles on the larger knives fill the hand nicely. This helps in connecting the knife to your hand, making one unit of the knife, your hand and your arm. This is important on lightweight knives since they don’t have the weight to carry through the target. However, with a good grip on these hand-filling handles, you can transfer some of the weight of your arm into the target and make cuts as if you had a much heavier knife. I also liked the handles on the smaller knives, since they are long enough to fit even my wide paws.


The Tests:

I wanted to put these knives through realistic tests appropriate for their intended use, construction and price with an eye towards the needs of practitioners of the martial art I teach (the Pekiti-Tirsia system). Here is what I came up with.

specplus4.jpg


Test 1. Cutting through clothing in a defensive situation is more difficult than cutting through skin or muscle. Therefore I took an old pair of jeans, stuffed them with a roll of newspaper, hung the jeans up, so that they could swing freely and hacked away. I tested both of the longer knives in this test and both easily made deep cuts nearly the full length of their blades.

Test 2. Here I used the small knives to repeated stab the sidewalls on the top tire of my tire stack. This is a common Pekiti-Tirsia knife training technique to develop the grip and focus. It also tests the knife’s tip geometry and handle design. Both the SP-40 and SP-41 penetrated the tire easily without the handle slipping in my grip. One big thing I like about these knives is the length of their handles. Most knife makers seem to feel that a knife with a small blade looks better with a small handle. Well, my hand does not change in size when I use a small knife. I want a handle that fits my hand and the handles on the smaller knives from Ontario do.

Test 3. To test tip strength I stabbed all four knives into a seasoned 6” diameter oak log and then pried the tip out (oak is of similar density to bone). I tried this test on both the end and side grain and none of the blades broke or bent on this test.


specplus5.jpg


specplus9.jpg



Test 4. The test medium here was a 4” diameter x ¼” thick cardboard tube from a carpet shop. I saw these tubes used in the class of Bando master Dr. Mung Gyi and liked the idea (and most carpet stores will give them to you for the asking). For this test I stood a cardboard tube up so that it was free standing and made a quick cut with each of the larger knives. Both bit deeply and held, rather than sending the tube flying, as a blade with poor edge geometry would. I also stabbed each knife into the tube, with the same good penetration with the thin, pointed blades. Again, I wanted to see good penetration without sending the medium flying away and both knives did their job well.

specplus7.jpg


Test 5. Here I cut hardwood branches with the long knives. Each knife made deep cuts and held an edge well. The Kraton handles are well designed, the combination of grooves, the smooth area between them and the hook at the end of the handle make for a grip that you can hold onto without developing hot spots (as you can with the more aggressive diamond patterned Kraton that Cold Steel uses on its large carbon steel knives).

specplus8.jpg


Test 6. About 25 years ago, I managed a Cultery World store in Houston, TX. Several times a month, customers would come in with folding knives they had purchased from us that had the tip broken off (they said from dropping it on a concrete floor, but who knows). These knives were from a large, well recognized knife company and that particular model of folder was probably the most popular folder of its day. Therefore, my test here is to drop the largest of the knives tip first onto a concrete sidewalk: first from 3 feet and then from 6. In the photo above the bottom blade has passed the test with only the barest dulling of the tip. The top blade is there for comparison. You can just about make out the difference in the photo.

Test 7. Sharpening. I used three sharpening methods, a diamond dust coated rod, a ceramic rod and flat Norton stones-using a different method for each knife. As I expected with these carbon steel knives, the blades sharpened right up quickly and easily.

If you liked knives such as Cold Steel’s Recon Scout, but feel that it’s too heavy to actually carry, you will appreciate the larger two knives from Ontario. And if you are looking for a good EDC fixed blade, then either the 3 ¾” bladed SP-40 or SP-41 would make a great choice.

Finally, here’s the email Dan sent me regarding the design and construction of these knives. As you can see, he has put a great deal of thought and experience into them.


Hi Bill,

Here is some information about the Gen II Spec Plus line that are being made at Ontario. I was given complete control over the material, heat treatment and manufacturing process, so I took my 18 years of factory experience and, remembering all the failures I had seen in knives over that period, eliminated any processes that might damage the knife.

1. Material- American made 5160 and not some unknown import of indifferent quality supplied by a large steel retailer. This stuff is made by WCI in the US and I had micros done so I could examine the material and it is very nice. I like 5160 because it is quite a bit tougher than the higher carbon steels (such as 1095) and is much more compatible to industrial style heat treatment. I also found the cutting ability comparable to higher carbon steels in my physical testing, contrary to what one might read in the literature.

2. Water Jet Cutting- the blade blanks were cut out of the plate using a water jet cutter rather than a laser because I have seen many blades ruined by laser cutting. The laser leaves a heat effected zone around the perimeter of the blank which has a combination of melted steel, hardened steel and hardened and tempered steel which can cause cracking while the blanks are being cut and when heat treated.

3. Stress Relief- I introduced a vacuum stress relief operation after cutting to eliminate any residual stress that might cause straightening or other problems due mainly to coil memory.

4. Surface Grind- I had about 0.030" per side ground off to eliminate any possibility of problems from the hot rolled surface. I once had blades made of 5160 from a large steel retailer crack due to cracks in the surface of the material from the hot rolling process."

5. Heat Treatment- I set the hardening temperatures, soak times, quench, snap temper and temper procedures based on my research/experimentation with this material. I heat treated blades in my shop, tested them and then had metallurgical analysis done of each procedure to document them. I also added the snap temper step to the factory heat treatment. This is an operation that I have never seen done in any other knife factory but one that I have always used in my own knife making and is common in commercial heat treatment plants. What it does is relieves some of the stresses of hardening before the clamp and temper operation and prevents any cracking of the blades while tempering. I also introduced heavy duty tempering racks which results in straighter blades which results in more consistent grinds.

6. Grind- I supervise the grinding set ups and specify dimensions for the taper and edge thickness which results in functional blade geometries which can be repeated throughout the production.

7. Laser Imprint- I have seen many blades damaged or destroyed by stamped imprints. When blades are powder coated they must be imprinted deeply and I have seen blades cracked by the imprint or weakened to the point that they crack in heat treatment. These blades are laser engraved which only really effects the powder coat.

8. Sharpening- I trained the sharpeners at Ontario and they sharpen with two abrasive belts of different grits to refine the edge (the usual factory procedure uses one belt) and then a buff to remove the burr and further refine the edge.

9. Designs- I tried to design these blades from a strictly functional perspective. The blades are fairly wide and flat ground to maximize cutting ability and are based on traditional designs with various functional aspects exaggerated. The SP-40 blade is based on the European "Alpine" knife, the SP-41 on the Skene Dhu and the SP 42 and 43 based on a variety of dirks.

Regards,
Dan

Here are some retail links that carry the new Ontario Gen II knives:

http://www.knifeoutlet.com/shop/10Ex...uctCode=ON8543

http://www.knifecenter.com/kc_new/st...datarq=on854

http://www.knivesplus.com/ONTARIO-KNIVES-SPEC-PLUS.HTML


Regards,
Bill McGrath
 
Cool, any idea why the small knives cost more than the large ones? Is it the sheaths?
 
I like the knife, and have the 8 inch bladed one. This concerns me. Not greatly, mind you, but it does concern me a bit.

The SP-40 blade is based on the European "Alpine" knife, the SP-41 on the Skene Dhu and the SP 42 and 43 based on a variety of dirks.

I'm in one of the states that doesn't allow "dirks and daggers". To me, it looks like a camp knife. To a cop, or a prosecutor it could look like a "dirk".

It's unfortunate he brought his penchant to name items to draw the mall ninja crowd along with his knifemaking skills.

5160 at RC 54-55 sharpens really easily compared to the steels I'm used to sharpening. It's the O.C.S. ( Old Chevy Spring) steel and it still works well on largish knives. Joe
 
I like this line from Ontario. I have a couple that have performed quite well. The new offerings look interesting. I like the smaller blades.
 
It's unfortunate he brought his penchant to name items to draw the mall ninja crowd along with his knifemaking skills.

Yes, because kilt-clad ninja roamed the highlands of feudal Scotland, I mean, Japan, wielding sgian dubhs.

"Dirk" isn't a dirty word, and it isn't synonymous with that over-used, hackneyed, near-meaningless pejorative term "mall ninja" (which, these days, is used more often than not to refer to anything and anyone with whom the person using it disagrees). It's simply a blade style.
 
Looks good. The grind alone is a nice improvement over the old models.
 
Dirk" isn't a dirty word,

In north carolina it is.


North Carolina - See full texts below. Updated July 2004, August 2005.


- 14-269 (excerpts). Carrying concealed weapons. (a) It shall be
unlawful for any person, except when on his own premises,
willfully and intentionally to carry concealed about his
person any bowie knife, dirk, dagger... razor... or other
deadly weapon of like kind.
 
Every state has stupid knife laws. That doesn't mean the person who named the knife in question is trying to "draw the mall ninja crowd."
 
Cool, any idea why the small knives cost more than the large ones? Is it the sheaths?

The small knives cost more because of the butt caps. I emailed your question to Dan Maragni and this is his reply.

The regular Spec Plus handle simply slides on the tang and is fastened by a grommet through the tang which is then flared. The SP 40/41 have the aluminum buttcap (extra materials cost) which has to be powdercoated (extra materials cost) then the end of the tang has to be threaded (extra labor cost) and then the cap has to be glued and screwed into place (extra labor cost). Then added to all the direct extra costs is the overhead added to each extra material cost and operation, all this is typical of factory
pricing.

Regards,
Bill McGrath
 
Welcome TuhonBill. That was a very nice review, thanks for the information!
 
They look like winners to me. I like the seven incher, myself. Might have to retire my old SP-1 and pick one up. Look like quality, well designed knives that are affordable.
 
Bill -

Any idea if Ontario plans to manufacture any other patterns? I'd love a Pilot's Survival pattern or a large bowie in 5160.
 
Bill -

Any idea if Ontario plans to manufacture any other patterns? I'd love a Pilot's Survival pattern or a large bowie in 5160.


Dan showed me some 9 inch blades in the Spec Plus Gen II line that should be out next year.

I don't think they have current plans for redoing the Pilot Survival pattern, but if enough people email Ontario requesting it, that could change.


Regards,
Bill McGrath
 
I have an old SP8 Survival Machete, great for camp and wood choppin' chores, I take it and my EK Combat Bowie with me when I go wanderin' in the weeds.

With those two and a good pocket knife I don't usually need any other knives.
 
A solid review; I particularly liked the assorted tests with the exception of the 'drop a blade point on concrete test' which just left me scratching my head.
 
Back
Top