Hear me out, an important fresh note on the rave for "Chris Reeve Sebenza knives".
First, let me say that I've written this in the belief that all Sebenza's are folders and that I cannot help but wondering what all the fuss is about (testimonials, price). I'm considdering to buy one of those knives, you know. I have never touched or used a Sebenza but however I noticed the following:
I think that we can all agree that the primary duty of a knife is being able to do a good cutting job, being able to sink its edge in what it is meant for. All the extra features (generalization but not that out of line for utility knife) besides the edge have a supporting role and allow users to carry the edge and control it as they see fit.
So, we all expect of a knife to be there for us when we need it. Overall, there are two kinds of knives: fixed ones and folders. The major drawbock of the fixed blades is their SIZE. The major drawback of folders is the sensitive folding/locking action that actually incorporates moving parts in knife-design as opposed to fixed blades. They are relatively smaller and thus easier to carry with you. The only knife that is of any use is that knife that is right there to use.
Moving parts mean wear and tear, small corners that are hard to reach for required maintenance, margins... In all a folder is not that simple (I say "simple" not "good", it's a trade-off)and sturdy as a handle and blade made of the same piece of solid metal. Logically, their edge does not fold (!). Folding is an action that supports accesabilty to the blade when you need it.
I want a knife to do proper cutting and to keep doing that. This inherently means maintenance. Folders need more maintenance, however durable they are and however minute the design-margins are, then fixed knives. Ergonomics, looks and more are optional.
It seems that our Sebenza strains itself to unimaginable limits to be a fixed blade. It seems to want so badly to offer the demanding user BOTH the advantages of fixed and folder yet none of the drawbacks. That in itself is an excellent philosophy. What's more remarkable is that it meets these very high standards in a seemingly flawless way.
Sebenza is easy to maintain, dependable, locks tight, looks good, pivots smooth and steady, is very carry-able and comfortable. These are wonderfull features... for a folding knife. Plenty of fixed knives offer these benefits.
So the sebenza is nearly a very handy fixed blade... That is quite surprising.
It seems the edge is superb too, does an excellent job, is easy to maintain but still offers the edge retention disireable.
But why pay like crazy for in knife like this while cheaper fixed ones really offer the same thing, fit with a prper sheath and some carrying drawbacks. Seems a somewhat littele knife for big bucks. Why SHOULDN'T we expect that a folder, all folders do not let us down? What we (well.. euh... wat I want at least...*lol*) want is the keenest of edges and superb retention for a fair price. I mean, considdering what you pay for your Sebie, should you be surprized that you can cut an apple with it?
Well, I'm stil considdering of buying a Sebie but if that knife can't handle flimsy critic of me than what CAN it handle
Kind greetings and see ya!
First, let me say that I've written this in the belief that all Sebenza's are folders and that I cannot help but wondering what all the fuss is about (testimonials, price). I'm considdering to buy one of those knives, you know. I have never touched or used a Sebenza but however I noticed the following:
I think that we can all agree that the primary duty of a knife is being able to do a good cutting job, being able to sink its edge in what it is meant for. All the extra features (generalization but not that out of line for utility knife) besides the edge have a supporting role and allow users to carry the edge and control it as they see fit.
So, we all expect of a knife to be there for us when we need it. Overall, there are two kinds of knives: fixed ones and folders. The major drawbock of the fixed blades is their SIZE. The major drawback of folders is the sensitive folding/locking action that actually incorporates moving parts in knife-design as opposed to fixed blades. They are relatively smaller and thus easier to carry with you. The only knife that is of any use is that knife that is right there to use.
Moving parts mean wear and tear, small corners that are hard to reach for required maintenance, margins... In all a folder is not that simple (I say "simple" not "good", it's a trade-off)and sturdy as a handle and blade made of the same piece of solid metal. Logically, their edge does not fold (!). Folding is an action that supports accesabilty to the blade when you need it.
I want a knife to do proper cutting and to keep doing that. This inherently means maintenance. Folders need more maintenance, however durable they are and however minute the design-margins are, then fixed knives. Ergonomics, looks and more are optional.
It seems that our Sebenza strains itself to unimaginable limits to be a fixed blade. It seems to want so badly to offer the demanding user BOTH the advantages of fixed and folder yet none of the drawbacks. That in itself is an excellent philosophy. What's more remarkable is that it meets these very high standards in a seemingly flawless way.
Sebenza is easy to maintain, dependable, locks tight, looks good, pivots smooth and steady, is very carry-able and comfortable. These are wonderfull features... for a folding knife. Plenty of fixed knives offer these benefits.
So the sebenza is nearly a very handy fixed blade... That is quite surprising.
It seems the edge is superb too, does an excellent job, is easy to maintain but still offers the edge retention disireable.
But why pay like crazy for in knife like this while cheaper fixed ones really offer the same thing, fit with a prper sheath and some carrying drawbacks. Seems a somewhat littele knife for big bucks. Why SHOULDN'T we expect that a folder, all folders do not let us down? What we (well.. euh... wat I want at least...*lol*) want is the keenest of edges and superb retention for a fair price. I mean, considdering what you pay for your Sebie, should you be surprized that you can cut an apple with it?
Well, I'm stil considdering of buying a Sebie but if that knife can't handle flimsy critic of me than what CAN it handle

Kind greetings and see ya!