JW,
It is excellent to be idealistic, and it's great to be motivated.
Knowing and speaking the truth is even more important.
Let me give you one quick example of a conflict the US in no way "won".
The Barbary Pirates had been a nuisance for years in the Mediterranean. In the early 1800s, not being satisfied with merely capturing US merchant vessels for ransom and enslaving their crew, they came to open conflict with all US vessels.
I'll make my summary quick: despite some few notable victories, the US suffered numerous defeats, including the loss of the USS Philadelphia on a reef at low tide. (All the captain had to do was wait for high tide- the surrounding pirate vessels' cannon were shorter-ranged; but, he surrendered.) Finally, with the rightful ruler in tow, a "combined" Arab-American-Greek force (those vaunted "shores of Tripoli" Marines were a mere handful) marched towards Tripoli, fighting a bloody battle at Derne. As they neared their objective, with increasing popular support among the indigenous people, the US representative paid to negotiate a peace with the ruler of Tripoli that accomplished nothing except promising the return of US prisoners and betraying the legitimate and honorable prince.
How did we "win" in Vietnam? (Remember- "winning" is defined not in # of kills or ground taken, but in accomplishment of the objective.)
Who "wins" if the conflict is internal?
Dying while fighting for a worthy goal is honorable, but so is being honest. Being honest and intelligent is even better, and being those things plus knowing a little history is better still. As a soldier and leader, it behooves you to do so, even if it means not parroting and choosing to believe some ridiculous "HOOAH!" sloganeering, and further, being honest with yourself and others would appear to be a feature of both the "Integrity" and "Personal Courage" parts of the Army Values.
Hooah?
John
Honor is living up to the Army Values. It starts with being honest with ones self and being truthful and sincere in all of our actions.