- Joined
- Jan 30, 2002
- Messages
- 7,269
OK, I figure that the frog and hangers on the khuks are probably a British influence--a carry-over from swords. The original use was to put the sheath in a sash around the waist, with a button to hold it in place.
English/European dress, wearing belts, probably influenced the belt loop on contemporary knives.
I'm speculating here, but I'd figure that Swedish/Finnish/Saami knives are used with sheaths that dangle on cord because of the bulky hand-coverings that the folks up there require. That might also explain the long handle/short blade that is typical.
Asian knives seem more to be held in place with a sash, as well.
But THIS: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2582531093&category=4173
Is one of many representatives of American Indian sheaths I've seen..which seem to be against the body, with the belt holding them in place and pressing the sheath against the torso. Yes? That is, the belt/sash/tie would insert under the sheath, come up through the one hole, and then press the entire unit against the wearer's body.
Or not?
Anyone know?
English/European dress, wearing belts, probably influenced the belt loop on contemporary knives.
I'm speculating here, but I'd figure that Swedish/Finnish/Saami knives are used with sheaths that dangle on cord because of the bulky hand-coverings that the folks up there require. That might also explain the long handle/short blade that is typical.
Asian knives seem more to be held in place with a sash, as well.
But THIS: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2582531093&category=4173
Is one of many representatives of American Indian sheaths I've seen..which seem to be against the body, with the belt holding them in place and pressing the sheath against the torso. Yes? That is, the belt/sash/tie would insert under the sheath, come up through the one hole, and then press the entire unit against the wearer's body.
Or not?
Anyone know?
