daizee
Knifemaker / Craftsman / Service Provider
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2009
- Messages
- 11,154
Hi All,
you've collectively inspired me to waste time at the flea market again... for shame.
I picked up these two Imperial Kamp Kings for what was probably too much, and was still very little. At least I'm fairly certain the main blade is far more functional than any modern hardware store counter knife for the same money! I bought them (separate vendors) because they were made in Providence, and I live in RI - former home of LOTS of toolmakers.
Based on an image of Imperial marks found here, these are from the two most recent eras, but the older one is still no more recent than 1956.
They show considerable differences, including:
* different bail
* thicker liners/spacers (and brass) on the older
* better grinding on the older
* better seating of the main blade on the older (or serious wear on the newer?)
* small vs. large pins securing the plastic covers
* sharper stampings on blade and shield on the older
* different tuning of the springs
* different sized shields
* different faux jigging patterns on the covers
* different overall weight (older is heavier - thicker brass liners?)
The newer is on the left, the older on the right.
In THIS case, older IS better!
I'm considering taking apart the newer one to plan replacement of the covers on the older one... is this blasphemy for a $10 knife? Neither is likely to get much use as-is, but with clean shadow micarta or G10 covers and cleaned up internals I think it might make a nice gift and get some use.
Thoughts?
you've collectively inspired me to waste time at the flea market again... for shame.
I picked up these two Imperial Kamp Kings for what was probably too much, and was still very little. At least I'm fairly certain the main blade is far more functional than any modern hardware store counter knife for the same money! I bought them (separate vendors) because they were made in Providence, and I live in RI - former home of LOTS of toolmakers.
Based on an image of Imperial marks found here, these are from the two most recent eras, but the older one is still no more recent than 1956.
They show considerable differences, including:
* different bail
* thicker liners/spacers (and brass) on the older
* better grinding on the older
* better seating of the main blade on the older (or serious wear on the newer?)
* small vs. large pins securing the plastic covers
* sharper stampings on blade and shield on the older
* different tuning of the springs
* different sized shields
* different faux jigging patterns on the covers
* different overall weight (older is heavier - thicker brass liners?)
The newer is on the left, the older on the right.
In THIS case, older IS better!
I'm considering taking apart the newer one to plan replacement of the covers on the older one... is this blasphemy for a $10 knife? Neither is likely to get much use as-is, but with clean shadow micarta or G10 covers and cleaned up internals I think it might make a nice gift and get some use.
Thoughts?