- Joined
- Nov 12, 2005
- Messages
- 1,494
http://www.buckknives.com/index.cfm?event=product.detail&productid=3701
Is this new? Anyone have one?
Is this new? Anyone have one?
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
It's been talked about some here and over in the Wilderness forum.
Don't have one yet, but ordered it yesterday from Buck with the 40% off discount. Makes it a very affordable, light knife!
Will cord wrap the handle if need be and find a use for it.
FANTASTIC knives!!!!!!!!!!!!! I had a chance to use them both on my dads deer sunday. They were great! I love them both, but I think I like the caper version a tad more. It was perfect for skinning! Also easier for me to touch up, it has a nice curve to the blade. The belly in the skinner blade wanst bad, but I could have done without it.
EASY cleanup also! Knives were very manueverable during skinning! I also used them for removing the meat from the bone, but they were a tad short, for me. They worked, but the 105 is more suited for this task![]()
Heres some pics comparing to a 110 for size reference:
![]()
Thanks for the pictures. Looks like nice small knife. I thought it would be a little bigger. What does the sheath look like?
FANTASTIC knives!!!!!!!!!!!!! I had a chance to use them both on my dads deer sunday. They were great! I love them both, but I think I like the caper version a tad more. It was perfect for skinning! Also easier for me to touch up, it has a nice curve to the blade. The belly in the skinner blade wanst bad, but I could have done without it.
EASY cleanup also! Knives were very manueverable during skinning! I also used them for removing the meat from the bone, but they were a tad short, for me. They worked, but the 105 is more suited for this task![]()
Heres some pics comparing to a 110 for size reference:
![]()