I have collected knives made by well known makers and also by not so well known makers. I like them all. Each has its own individual character. I think of knives as Art. Sometimes they are mostly appreciated visually. But sometimes the Art is in balance and grace felt only by the hand. And there is Art in craftsmanship, functionality, and utility.
I like very well made knives made by relatively unknown makers who receive little money for their work. And I like knives made by very well known makers who can make a lot more money for the same or perhaps even less effort. Sometimes there is a large difference in the quality of work. Sometimes there is not. It all depends. Generally, there seems to be a more consistent quality in knives made by the "known" makers. If these makers are master smiths of the ABS, their work has been repeatedly examined, and representative knives have been performance tested. It is normal in collecting Artwork to expect to pay more money for a work by a well-known artist. It's the same thing with knives.
Part of the Art of knives and knifemaking is line and form. Part of the Art is in the skill of the craftsman and his use of tools. Part of the Art is in the understanding the craftsman has about the use of materials and techniques. Part of the Art is the creation of an optimally functional tool from optimally functional materials. And the really successful artist also has to know how to market his work.
A relatively new maker usually has little command over all of these facets of knifemaking. This will probably show in many small ways when examining the knife. A well-known maker has usually learned through hard work, determination, and inspiration to produce a product that is consistently excellent. In order to market his work, the maker may have to spend large sums of money to attend shows and pay other expenses. Unless a maker is somewhat well known, the Internet purveyors probably won't display his work. One should expect to pay more for the work of a well-known knifemaker. Does this mean that the knife will be better than a knife from a relatively unknown maker? Maybe. Maybe not.
One of the true joys in collecting knives is finding that special piece out the hundreds one may see at a knife show, in a magazine, or on the Internet. Unfortunately, for all of the reasons discussed here, many good knife makers remain relatively unknown. I think finding a relatively inexpensive knife by a new knifemaker whose work is excellent is one of the true joys of collecting. My favorite knife was made by Daniel Winkler, who recently became an ABS Master Smith. But three of my treasures were made by TB Morgan of Timonium MD who makes the most beautiful knives with outstanding temper lines in file steel, 5160, and W1 tool steel. His knives are fantastic. They were made to be used. And priced accordingly. I plan to watch Tim work get better and better, and to receive more and more money for his work in coming years. I also have collected a couple of Herb Derr's knives. His mosaic damascus is really spectacular and is priced very fairly. Will I use these knives just because they were less costly than some of my other knives? Will I just play with them and admire their beauty and workmanship? Will I someday sell them? I don't know just yet. I just know that I like them.
I think you should collect what you like. I don't think that the present day value, or the future value of a knife should be dominate considerations. I don't understand people who would collect knives they don't like but were made by a famous maker. And I don't understand why someone would not buy a knife they really like just because the maker is unknown. Its fun to discover a really talented maker before their work increases in value. Some knives are too expensive and precious to use. Others demand to be used. I try to only collect knives that I can at least imagine using. Because to fully appreciate the art of knifemaking, one has to use one's mind, eyes, hands, and heart.
Paracelsus
[This message has been edited by Paracelsus (edited 11 November 1999).]
