I'm really annoyed about myself sometimes when it comes to my knife collection. My favorite Edc has long been the Schrade 34OT, which I bought on a trip to Scranton in 2004.I actually bought several as gifts in a Home Depot store. Then I read and realized the model had carbon blades originally and that mine is stainless. I can't get a carbon bladed one on ebay out of weird sentimental reasons even if it irritates me that I got at stainless. All of this just because I like to read the forum. And I do realize I'm being not really sane
-
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details: https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is$300$250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
Personal reflection
- Thread starter Hjalmar69
- Start date
screened porch
Basic Member
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2012
- Messages
- 18,729
You mean you'd be being disloyal to your old stainless one if you got a carbon one? Get it a carbon one to keep it company.
hornetguy
Gold Member
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2015
- Messages
- 3,487
yes... it would be like his brother from another mother.....
they would get along just fine. You could justify it by telling the stainless one that you don't want to wear it out prematurely. The carbon one is going to "share the load"....
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2020
- Messages
- 509
They were separated at birth and you have finally brought them back together
afishhunter
Basic Member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2014
- Messages
- 14,434
I believe starting in 1991/1992 most of the Schrade family received the "+" downgrade ... or "upgrade" depending upon your point of view.
There are even some (like the 858) that are breaking the rules. They lack the "Schrade +" tang stamp, yet have stainless steel blades anyway.
There are even some (like the 858) that are breaking the rules. They lack the "Schrade +" tang stamp, yet have stainless steel blades anyway.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2013
- Messages
- 4,897
Most 34ot’s are carbon. They were carbon for many years up until the late years of schrade when the stainless started sneaking in.
I have around 10 or so plain 34ot’s and all are carbon except one. The stainless one isn’t marked as such but it passed the stain test. I think you should grab a carbon one, your trusty old 34ot would like the company.
I have around 10 or so plain 34ot’s and all are carbon except one. The stainless one isn’t marked as such but it passed the stain test. I think you should grab a carbon one, your trusty old 34ot would like the company.
It just irritates me that I'm so thoroughly disturbed that I actually get worked up over the fact that I don't think it is the "real deal". It is a cheap tool! And I have the 897UH and a Camillus Yellow jacket that are stainless. I have nothing against pocket knives in stainless.
Are the 34OT hard to find in good condition with carbon blades?
Are the 34OT hard to find in good condition with carbon blades?
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2009
- Messages
- 13,432
Schrade USA's 1095 steel, and their exemplary heat treat of it, are why I view their carbon-bladed knives as a gold standard to which I compare all others. I've learned a lot about the capabilities of 1095 and about the capabilities of makers using it, by comparing to results I've attained with my 8OT Old Timer - it sharpens up beautifully and the thin blades have incredible springy temper. This is reason enough to acquire one of them to see how they sharpen up and perform.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2011
- Messages
- 181
Shoot me an email at stanley.rosenkampff@gmail.com
Ill show you how easy it can be to find one in good condition.
All the best,
Stan
Modoc ED
Gold Member
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2010
- Messages
- 14,034
I don't know if this will be useful to any of you but here it is anyway.
Schrade Blade Steel
One question that arises time after time is regarding which blade steels Schrade used. For many years, those of us who grew up owning and using Schrade Old Timer and Uncle Henry knives had a pat answer. Or at least we thought we did. That answer, dating back to 1967 with the introduction of the earliest Uncle Henry knife, the 897UH Premium Signature Stockman, was “Old Timers use high carbon steel in their blades, and Uncle Henry knives use Schrade+ stainless steel.” Research and communications with Schrade employees here in this forum since 2000 have revealed a slightly different answer, not nearly as cut and dried as we are used to.
I am reminded of an old Volkswagen ad campaign where they showed a Beetle in water. The tag line was “A VW will definitely float, but it will not float indefinitely”. While all Schrade knives marked “SCHRADE+” are stainless steel, not all Old Timers and Uncle Henry knives not so marked are carbon steel.
Originally Posted by Tim Faust, Schrade Product Manager 9/19/01
The...trapper..285UH...started out in 1969 with high carbon blades. The catalogs don’t list it with stainless until around 1977, but we probably started using it earlier than that (maybe around 1973 or 1974)....All records that we can find on the 897(UH), even from the first year of production in 1967, indicate that it was made from stainless steel, but it was the only small Uncle Henry stockman that we made in the very beginning.
The Uncle Henry line started out when our knives were stamped “Schrade-Walden”, and it wasn’t until a couple of years into production (probably around 1974) before we started using the “Schrade+” stamp, so even though a knife isn’t stamped “Schrade+”, it may still be stainless.
We did make a few other Uncle Henry’s with high carbon steel, but they were all rigid blades (165UH, 153UH, 171UH, and 172UH).
Originally Posted by SchradeWebGuy 6/21/04
About the carbon steel. We are cutting back some for now...Financial reasons... Most of the knives that have always had the high carbon are now being produced with Schrade+. It’s unlikely that it will stay that way, but for now we have to take some unpleasant steps to weather the storm.
Originally Posted by Debbie Chase, Schrade CSR 11/25/04
Actually, I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but it is very possible that the blade of your 152OT could actually be stainless. Because of difficulty with their steel suppliers in supplies and soaring prices, and the demand by stores like Wal-mart to keep prices down, Schrade did (I believe around 1997, if I remember correctly) begin to do a running transformation from carbon to stainless. Unfortunately, they did this hoping that if the tang stamps were not changed, no one would notice. Being in direct contact with knife enthusiasts on a daily basis, I did advise them that people would definitely know...and I was left “holding the bag”, when people would return their “high carbon steel” knives because they were stainless.....Quite honestly though, I knew they had switched over a lot of folders, but I was not aware that they had begun doing it with rigid blades.”Apparently, Schrade did perform a test marketing of sorts to check the validity of Ms. Chase’s assertions and her feedback from disgruntled customers.
Originally Posted by lrv 10/21/05
You won’t see too many of these around. This 19OT was made the same year that the 512OT surfaced.
Originally Posted by Codger 10/21/05
The original owner of the 512OT declared it to have been purchased in late ‘89, and it came to him in the standard tan 152OT marked box. The right box for the knife, acquired later from a friend, had a 1991 copyright date. So that gives us a timeframe.....
Yes, Schrade did mark this pair Schrade+ on both tangstamps and boxes. And the catalogs eventually dropped the references to what steel the Old Timers were made from (late in the game).Now that I have thoroughly confused you, and blown long time dearly held ideals of absolute truths, we will look at the steels themselves.
“High Carbon Cutlery Steel”, at least in the case of Imperial Schrade Old Timers and Uncle Henry knives so blessed, refers to AISI 1095HC. It has a carbon content of between .95% and 1.05%, Magnesium 0.30-0.50%, Phosphorus (max.) 0.040%, sulphur (max.) 0.050% according to ladle samples. “Famous for both it’s edge hold ability and resharpening ease. One of the charactoristics of this steel is that it will darken or discolor with use, especially if used on meats or fruits. Care must be taken with a carbon steel knife to prevent rust. The blades should be kept dry and lightly oiled occasionally.”
Originally Posted by Debbie Chase, Schrade CSR 12/06/04
The feeling by many knife users that the rust and discoloration of high carbon steel was an inconvenience was most definitely the reason for the introduction of stainless steel. While most avid users preferred the high carbon steel and honestly felt that the steel wasn’t a good steel until it was seasoned (darkened and discolored) properly, there was always quite a number of people writing in to complain that the steel must be a very poor steel, because they couldn’t slice their apples without it rusting....“Schrade+” steel was actually a trademarked name used for at least two different stainless steel alloys. First was 440A. Then a change was made to 420HC. As of this time, there is conflicting information about when this change took place, but it seems to have been sometime after the 2000 production year. The 440A has a carbon content of 0.60-0.75%, Chromium 16.0-18.0%, Manganese 1.00%, Molybdenum 0.75%, Phosphorus 0.04%, Silicon 1%, and Sulphur 0.03% according to ladle sample maximums. Stainless steel is just as it’s name implies... it “stains less”, but will still discolor or rust to some extent if not properly cared for. Both carbon and stainless blades were heat treated to 56-59 Rockwell.
Every knife enthusiast/user has their own opinion as to which blade steel is best, and which characteristics are most important to them. I’ll not delve into that can of worms here, but to say that my preference is carbon steel. Whatever your preferences, you should be able to find a carbon bladed Old Timer, or a stainless one, if that is what you like. It just takes some searching. Best clues for a carbon steel Old Timer is to try to get one new in an older package, pre 1997 or so. Or buy one with the beginnings of patina, easily removed if you like shiny blades.
A few later knives were made of exotic metals like true forged stainless (BTO1), ATS34 (Spitfire), CM154 (Original Loveless design), and if I remember correctly, the D’holders were of a custom steel/process.
This is my best effort to flesh out the answer to the question of Schrade steels, borrowing liberally from forum resources. Build on this guys.
EDIT: Recently acquired evidence suggests that 420HC SS was introduced, at least partially, in 1998 when they began using fine blanking on the LB7 production. If it was like most other changes in production, it was not like turning off one faucet and turning on another, the change was most likely gradual, what is called a "running change". And of course there is almost always a lag between when production began and shipping began.
Schrade Blade Steel
One question that arises time after time is regarding which blade steels Schrade used. For many years, those of us who grew up owning and using Schrade Old Timer and Uncle Henry knives had a pat answer. Or at least we thought we did. That answer, dating back to 1967 with the introduction of the earliest Uncle Henry knife, the 897UH Premium Signature Stockman, was “Old Timers use high carbon steel in their blades, and Uncle Henry knives use Schrade+ stainless steel.” Research and communications with Schrade employees here in this forum since 2000 have revealed a slightly different answer, not nearly as cut and dried as we are used to.
I am reminded of an old Volkswagen ad campaign where they showed a Beetle in water. The tag line was “A VW will definitely float, but it will not float indefinitely”. While all Schrade knives marked “SCHRADE+” are stainless steel, not all Old Timers and Uncle Henry knives not so marked are carbon steel.
Originally Posted by Tim Faust, Schrade Product Manager 9/19/01
The...trapper..285UH...started out in 1969 with high carbon blades. The catalogs don’t list it with stainless until around 1977, but we probably started using it earlier than that (maybe around 1973 or 1974)....All records that we can find on the 897(UH), even from the first year of production in 1967, indicate that it was made from stainless steel, but it was the only small Uncle Henry stockman that we made in the very beginning.
The Uncle Henry line started out when our knives were stamped “Schrade-Walden”, and it wasn’t until a couple of years into production (probably around 1974) before we started using the “Schrade+” stamp, so even though a knife isn’t stamped “Schrade+”, it may still be stainless.
We did make a few other Uncle Henry’s with high carbon steel, but they were all rigid blades (165UH, 153UH, 171UH, and 172UH).
Originally Posted by SchradeWebGuy 6/21/04
About the carbon steel. We are cutting back some for now...Financial reasons... Most of the knives that have always had the high carbon are now being produced with Schrade+. It’s unlikely that it will stay that way, but for now we have to take some unpleasant steps to weather the storm.
Originally Posted by Debbie Chase, Schrade CSR 11/25/04
Actually, I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but it is very possible that the blade of your 152OT could actually be stainless. Because of difficulty with their steel suppliers in supplies and soaring prices, and the demand by stores like Wal-mart to keep prices down, Schrade did (I believe around 1997, if I remember correctly) begin to do a running transformation from carbon to stainless. Unfortunately, they did this hoping that if the tang stamps were not changed, no one would notice. Being in direct contact with knife enthusiasts on a daily basis, I did advise them that people would definitely know...and I was left “holding the bag”, when people would return their “high carbon steel” knives because they were stainless.....Quite honestly though, I knew they had switched over a lot of folders, but I was not aware that they had begun doing it with rigid blades.”Apparently, Schrade did perform a test marketing of sorts to check the validity of Ms. Chase’s assertions and her feedback from disgruntled customers.
Originally Posted by lrv 10/21/05
You won’t see too many of these around. This 19OT was made the same year that the 512OT surfaced.
Originally Posted by Codger 10/21/05
The original owner of the 512OT declared it to have been purchased in late ‘89, and it came to him in the standard tan 152OT marked box. The right box for the knife, acquired later from a friend, had a 1991 copyright date. So that gives us a timeframe.....
Yes, Schrade did mark this pair Schrade+ on both tangstamps and boxes. And the catalogs eventually dropped the references to what steel the Old Timers were made from (late in the game).Now that I have thoroughly confused you, and blown long time dearly held ideals of absolute truths, we will look at the steels themselves.
“High Carbon Cutlery Steel”, at least in the case of Imperial Schrade Old Timers and Uncle Henry knives so blessed, refers to AISI 1095HC. It has a carbon content of between .95% and 1.05%, Magnesium 0.30-0.50%, Phosphorus (max.) 0.040%, sulphur (max.) 0.050% according to ladle samples. “Famous for both it’s edge hold ability and resharpening ease. One of the charactoristics of this steel is that it will darken or discolor with use, especially if used on meats or fruits. Care must be taken with a carbon steel knife to prevent rust. The blades should be kept dry and lightly oiled occasionally.”
Originally Posted by Debbie Chase, Schrade CSR 12/06/04
The feeling by many knife users that the rust and discoloration of high carbon steel was an inconvenience was most definitely the reason for the introduction of stainless steel. While most avid users preferred the high carbon steel and honestly felt that the steel wasn’t a good steel until it was seasoned (darkened and discolored) properly, there was always quite a number of people writing in to complain that the steel must be a very poor steel, because they couldn’t slice their apples without it rusting....“Schrade+” steel was actually a trademarked name used for at least two different stainless steel alloys. First was 440A. Then a change was made to 420HC. As of this time, there is conflicting information about when this change took place, but it seems to have been sometime after the 2000 production year. The 440A has a carbon content of 0.60-0.75%, Chromium 16.0-18.0%, Manganese 1.00%, Molybdenum 0.75%, Phosphorus 0.04%, Silicon 1%, and Sulphur 0.03% according to ladle sample maximums. Stainless steel is just as it’s name implies... it “stains less”, but will still discolor or rust to some extent if not properly cared for. Both carbon and stainless blades were heat treated to 56-59 Rockwell.
Every knife enthusiast/user has their own opinion as to which blade steel is best, and which characteristics are most important to them. I’ll not delve into that can of worms here, but to say that my preference is carbon steel. Whatever your preferences, you should be able to find a carbon bladed Old Timer, or a stainless one, if that is what you like. It just takes some searching. Best clues for a carbon steel Old Timer is to try to get one new in an older package, pre 1997 or so. Or buy one with the beginnings of patina, easily removed if you like shiny blades.
A few later knives were made of exotic metals like true forged stainless (BTO1), ATS34 (Spitfire), CM154 (Original Loveless design), and if I remember correctly, the D’holders were of a custom steel/process.
This is my best effort to flesh out the answer to the question of Schrade steels, borrowing liberally from forum resources. Build on this guys.
EDIT: Recently acquired evidence suggests that 420HC SS was introduced, at least partially, in 1998 when they began using fine blanking on the LB7 production. If it was like most other changes in production, it was not like turning off one faucet and turning on another, the change was most likely gradual, what is called a "running change". And of course there is almost always a lag between when production began and shipping began.