Please read...

Joined
Nov 5, 2004
Messages
534
This may or may not have been posted already. Please pass this to everyone you know.

Deadly pocketknives become a $1 billion business
Tuesday, July 25, 2006

By Mark Fritz, The Wall Street Journal


A decade ago, Jim Ray brought together a champion martial artist, a former Navy Seal and a police-weapons specialist to draft designs for what he hoped would be the perfect pocketknife.

But the high-tech knives the team created were never meant to whittle sticks. Instead, the team produced knives whose blades could be flicked open with one finger faster than the widely outlawed switchblade -- but were still perfectly legal. "Nobody wanted to call it a weapon" at the start, says Mr. Ray, a former proprietor of a North Carolina tourist shop. But eventually, he adds, "that changed." And soon Mr. Ray and the company he formed, Masters of Defense Inc., were marketing the blades' utility when "shooting is just not appropriate."

Mr. Ray was a pioneer in a technological revolution that has transformed "tactical" knives -- originally used in military combat -- into a $1-billion-a-year consumer business, aimed at just about anyone in the market for a small knife. These 21st century pocketknives, with their curved, perforated or serrated blades and ergonomic grips, can inflict deadly damage, but they are also compact, easily concealed and virtually unregulated.

In March, a monthly FBI bulletin alerted law-enforcement agents nationwide to "the emerging threats" posed by the knives. Though there are no statistics on how many crimes have involved tactical-style knives, the FBI says knife-related crimes have edged up, to 15.5 percent in 2004 from 15 percent in 2000. In that time, violent crime in general dropped 4.1 percent.

The knives' popularity has been a boon to some retailers. Mike Janes, owner of Second Amendment Sports, a hunting, fishing and camping superstore in Bakersfield, Calif., says that knife sales have been climbing an average of 25 percent a year in the past decade and that 75 percent of the pocketknives he sells are tactical. "Are you tacti-cool? That's what we say down here," Mr. Janes says.

Dave Vanderhoff, who runs U.S. Martial Arts in Clifford, N.J., recently taught a knife-fighting class that included a judge, a banker, a nurse, a young woman with a belly ring and a French chef from Manhattan. And Spyderco Inc., for example, makes a tactical knife that, when folded, masquerades as a credit card.

But the marketing techniques for some of the new pocketknives aren't so mainstream. Cold Steel Inc. makes the 3/4-ounce "Urban Pal," which has a 1.5-inch blade. "The Urban Pal should be standard equipment for survival in today's urban jungle," its Web site says.

Lawyers for the tactical-knife industry have persuaded government officials that even minor manual movement -- no matter how enhanced by levers and springs -- separates the knives from switchblades, which require pressing a button on the handle to flip open the blade. "We have to resist the application of the 1950s switchblade laws to the new technology," says lawyer Daniel Lawson, a knife collector in Pittsburgh who represents the tactical-knife industry. Thirty-seven states now outlaw switchblades, partly because they developed a cult following among teenagers in the 1950s. But, says David Kowalski, a former knife magazine editor and a spokesman for the industry, tactical knifes have remained legal because "the laws across the U.S. are a mishmash because (legislators) really don't know anything about knives."

Modern tactical knives are rooted in the 1980s, when some martial artists in the U.S. became practitioners of a Filipino style of knife-fighting. An early innovator was Ernest R. Emerson, a martial artist and custom knife builder. In 1995, Oregon's Benchmade Knife Co. collaborated with Mr. Emerson to mass produce the Closed Quarters Combat 7 knife. It opened quickly, locked in place and could be closed with one hand.

Mr. Emerson, 51 years old, says he insisted on selling that knife for $159, believing the high price, performance and custom look would give it cachet. The knife was a hit, and competition got hot. Mr. Emerson formed his own company in 1997 and says annual sales rose to about $10 million last year from $800,000 at the start.

Worried that they might face regulatory scrutiny, makers of the new-style pocketknives formed the American Knife and Tool Institute. The trade group credits U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat, with persuading U.S. Customs in 2001 to stop seizing shipments of one-hand-opening tactical knives that some investigators considered switchblades. A spokesman for Sen. Wyden, Andrew Blotky, says he can't confirm the senator's involvement.

Soon the upstarts who dominated the self-defense market were jolting the traditional knife industry. Buck Knife Co., a staple among sportsmen; W.R. Case & Sons Cutlery, famed for its collectible pen knives; and Leatherman Tool Group Inc., which makes pocket-sized tool kits, have all introduced tactical knives since 2003.

"It's a testosterone thing," says Buck's chairman, Charles "Chuck" Buck, 75 years old, who estimates the retail market for tactical knives at $1 billion.

Leatherman Tool Group jumped on the tactical-knife bandwagon in 2005, introducing a full line of tactical-type knives. The most prominent feature on its knives is the "Blade Launcher" mechanism, which lets the user flip a menacing-looking blade out of its handle with lightning speed. Yet it also has a bottle-cap opener, a nod to Leatherman's heritage.

Not all makers of tactical knives agree on how to market them. Buck, for example, boasts in marketing materials about the "stopping power" of its tactical knives and bills its "Bones" knife as "bad to the bone."

But Tom Arrowsmith, chief executive of W.R. Case, accuses competitors of "weaponizing" the pocketknife and says it's an approach his company won't take. He does concede, though, that customer demand has prompted his company, a 117-year-old maker of pretty penknives, to offer a line of one-hand-opening knives with tactical features.

The blades on most of the new pocketknives are less than four inches long, the maximum length that passengers were permitted to carry onto U.S. airlines before the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. In 2004, the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks concluded that the hijackers in those attacks used short knives -- not box cutters -- to seize control of the planes. At the Pennsylvania crash site, 14 badly damaged knife parts were collected, and at least half have tactical-knife characteristics. But the FBI cautions that it can't be sure those parts are from knives that belonged to the hijackers.

Technology has made blade length almost irrelevant. The city of Atlanta prohibits people from carrying pocketknives in public with blades longer than two inches. Yet, in a widely publicized case, ex-Marine Thomas Autry used a two-inch blade in May to kill one mugger and wound another when he was confronted by five assailants armed with a shotgun and a .38-caliber pistol.

"Clearly we are seeing wounds you would expect from a bigger blade from what victims say was a small knife," says Andrew Ulrich, a Boston Medical Center emergency-room doctor.

Mr. Janes of Second Amendment Sports is one of several retailers who have added knife training to their businesses. He says "this large influx of people carrying 'tactical folders' didn't know how to use them."

Nicholas Nobella, 25, took a four-hour class at the Bakersfield shop. Several months later, he admitted to police that he stuck his tactical knife into stripper Edward Pedrosa, 24, during a melee that broke out when men attending a bachelor party raided a bawdy bash for the bride-to-be, says Kern County, Calif., Deputy District Attorney Matt Magner. Mr. Pedrosa died. Mr. Nobella's lawyer says his client was acting in self-defense.

Mr. Janes says Mr. Nobella isn't typical of the students at his knife classes.

Meanwhile, in the race for the next big thing, some companies are competing to make more durable ceramic and plastic knives that can pass through metal detectors. Plastic "assisted-opening" knives that flick open with a slight nudge of the blade can be purchased on eBay for $20.

Cold Steel sales director Rick Valdez describes the company's $15 "Night Shade" plastic knives as "letter openers." Nonetheless, the company's Web site has a film clip of men attacking slabs of meat and decapitating plywood people, and it notes that the knives can be "taped just about anywhere" on the body.
 
It was bound to happen, and since this article was in the WSJ, we'll probably see smaller local media picking up on it. I think this writer was fairly objective, he didn't throw in any "threat to society" comments. Regarding the FBI statistics for a rise in knife crime, I wonder how much of that involves kitchen knives in domestic disputes. While violent crime is decreasing on the street, is it increasing in the home?
 
An interesting anecdote: A local museum I'm associated with recently received a mysterious shipment of 600 lightbulbs they never ordered. A week later came a bill for $600+. They called the company, argued about it, the man on the other end of the phone finally told them to keep the lightbulbs as a gift. Some kind of scam, obviously.

What's interesting is that with the shipment came a boxed knife...a cheap made in China tactical folder with a 3-1/2 inch tanto blade with half serrated edge, liner locked. Sharp, too. They threw it in as a gift premium. The museum receptionist is now keeping it in her desk.

Soon they'll be giving them away as prizes at tupperware parties ;).
 
An interesting anecdote: A local museum I'm associated with recently received a mysterious shipment of 600 lightbulbs they never ordered. A week later came a bill for $600+. They called the company, argued about it, the man on the other end of the phone finally told them to keep the lightbulbs as a gift. Some kind of scam, obviously.

What's interesting is that with the shipment came a boxed knife...a cheap made in China tactical folder with a 3-1/2 inch tanto blade with half serrated edge, liner locked. Sharp, too. They threw it in as a gift premium. The museum receptionist is now keeping it in her desk.

Soon they'll be giving them away as prizes at tupperware parties ;).
Can't wait for mine....:thumbup:
 
Pocketknives are Tools Used by Millions


By David D. Kowalski

Reply to: Wall Street Journal, Tuesday, July 25, 2006 … “How New, Deadly Pocketknives Became a $1 Billion Business”

“C’mon, everyone knows what a tactical knife is,” an exasperated Mark Fritz told me. “Are they folding knives or straight
knives? What kind of handles do they have? What kind of blades?” I asked. He couldn’t answer that. But he was clearly
frustrated with the progress of our interview for a story that was to appear in the Wall Street Journal. I pointed out that U.S.
laws had been using such terms as Bowie knife, dirk, dagger, and stiletto for decades, without providing any definitions.

The AKTI Approved Knife Definitions, adopted by the American Knife & Tool Institute on August 31, 2005, finally addressed
this gap in our legal system and crafted definitions for these knife categories named in statutes for more than 50 years.
Some 16 months earlier, AKTI approved its Protocol For Measuring Knife Blade Length, a necessary and long-awaited step.
There was no state with such a protocol even though more than 30 of them prohibit knives based on various blade lengths.

Mr. Fritz contacted me with an initial April 2006 phone message that was a clear misrepresentation; he claimed he was
writing a story on collaborations between custom knifemakers and companies that licensed their designs for commercial
sale. When we finally connected, he confessed he was actually doing a story on the growth of the “tactical knife” segment of
the industry.

I repeatedly cautioned him there are no accurate figures on total U.S. sales of sporting and pocket knives because all knife
companies are privately held. Therefore, even if we knew what tactical knives were, we could not provide either total sales or
any measure of sales growth. That didn’t stop Mr. Fritz. He took another three months to create a story sensational enough to
sell to the Wall Street Journal.

The Fritz article, “How New, Deadly Pocketknives Became a $1 Billion Business,” appeared in the WSJ on July 25. Mr. Fritz
wove together selective quotations taken out of context, innuendo that is portrayed as fact, and a few undocumented
numbers meant to convince readers he had done his research.

There have been cases in the last several years where unscrupulous reporters tried to build careers on fabricated
information. Dan Rather has been the most prominent recent example. Several others have chosen the same route, ending
their careers when they were unmasked, but also embarrassing old and established institutions that chose to publish copy-
selling sensationalism rather than documented fact.

Let’s look at the details Mr. Fritz provides. He cites FBI statistics and admits “there are no statistics on how many crimes
have involved tactical-style knives.” That’s because the FBI does not define tactical knives nor do the state reporting
agencies that submit data. Historically, the FBI has speculated that kitchen knives are involved in perhaps 95 percent of knife
cases because of domestic violence and because they are a “weapon of opportunity” during home invasions.

Mr. Fritz then tries to draw switchblade knives into his story. They are legal to manufacture and possess in several states.
For example, California allows them if the blade is less than two inches in length. Other states exempt them from their ban
when sold to law enforcement or military personnel or to persons with only one arm.

Switchblades are clearly defined in federal law and most states have adopted the federal language. Attorneys such as Mr.
Daniel Lawson, quoted in the article, are correct to insist on clarity in knife statutes. Mr. Lawson drafted the AKTI Approved
Knife Definitions and he states in the introduction, “Vague laws fail to provide persons targeted by the law or statute with
guidance so that they may know exactly what conduct is prohibited and so that they may adjust, or act, accordingly.”

The fact is that knife technology, metallurgy and design have come a long way since most knife laws were written decades
ago. Experts within any tool industry are challenged to keep up with emerging technology. Lawmakers, who are typically not
engineers, can only draft workable legislation if they get clear explanations of what is current and appreciate how fast any
technology can become obsolete. Console TVs, dial telephones and 8-track tape players have all been replaced with
several generations of new technology we could not have imagined even 30 years ago.

Mr. Fritz mentions one lawmaker by name. But here again he’s got his facts twisted. AKTI has never credited U.S. Senator
Ron Wyden of Oregon with any involvement in either the formation of AKTI or intervention with U.S. Customs on behalf of any
knife company. Senator Wyden has been a strong advocate of tech school training in Oregon and the Portland area, in
particular. Manufacturers in multiple industries and several U.S. knife companies are headquartered in Portland and have
benefited from Senator Wyden’s commitment to an educated workforce.

Mr. Fritz refers to a 2001 U.S. Customs case. The case actually occurred in 2000 (as reported in Volume 2, Issue 1 of the
AKTI News & Update). Columbia River Knife & Tool (CRKT) Company of Oregon, after years of successfully importing more
than 50 different models of sporting knives, had one shipment seized based on the arbitrary judgment on one day of one U.
S. Customs agent. When presented with the facts, Oregon U.S. Congresswoman Darlene Hooley and U.S. Senator Gordon
Smith co-signed a letter on October 17, 2000, that petitioned the head of U.S. Customs to examine the arbitrary field decision
and grant relief to CRKT. He reviewed the facts and issued his ruling on October 20, 2000, putting CRKT back in business
after an estimated loss of more than $1 million.

Mr. Fritz implies that AKTI was formed in 2001 as a result of that case. It was actually incorporated in January 1998 because
our 100-year-old industry, employing tens of thousands of craftsmen in plants across the country, had never had an
organization that represented them. Newspaper employees, by contrast, had already had a union representing them for
decades.

Mr. Fritz’s reference to the Flight 93 crash on 9/11 is another clever sleight-of-hand that crumbles when examined closely. He
tells us 14 badly damaged knife parts were recovered from the Pennsylvania crash site. But we have no idea who owned
those knives. And the parts could easily have been from a set of serrated steak knives in the checked baggage
compartment. If you saw the recent movie, United 93, supposedly based on exhaustive interviews of those people who were
phoned by passengers, you saw one knife held by one hijacker with a supposed bomb strapped to his chest. We don’t even
know if the bomb was real. Mr. Fritz added the qualifier that, “…the FBI cautions that it can’t be sure those parts are from
knives that belonged to the hijackers.” But other news reporters have already ignored that weak caution hidden at the end of
a paragraph.

Prior to 9/11, passengers by the millions regularly carried their pocketknives onto airplanes. After 9/11, even though knives
were banned in carry-on baggage, the U.S. Marshall’s Service and TSA are still collecting untold pounds of them every day.
Ordinary, law-abiding citizens are so used to carrying them they forget about the airline ban.

The fact is, law-abiding Americans, your neighbors and Mr. Fritz’s neighbors, carry and use knives every day for everything
from pruning the roses to hiking, camping and fishing to EMT rescue. Mr. Fritz wants readers to ignore those millions of U.S.
citizens. His tactic is to imply that only criminals have knives and inflame his argument with such words as “deadly” and
“menacing.” But the 12-inch knitting needles we can carry on planes can be deadly. And the unstable person swinging a
baseball bat can be menacing. AKTI has always advocated that criminals who use any weapon in the commission of a
crime be punished severely. Law-abiding citizens who carry knives for legitimate purposes should not.

Finally, we do concede that Mr. Fritz is correct when he says that, “Not all makers of … knives agree on how to market them.”
The American Knife & Tool Institute has issued advisories on such subjects as knife naming, for example. One of our four
stated goals is to “Promote the public awareness of the history and utility of knives as tools.” Another is to “Educate young
people about proper knife safety and the responsible use of knives.”

As for knife demand, many companies cited in the article are suppliers to some branch of the U.S. military. Their recent
growth has come from that significant demand. And countless other companies have donated knives and other equipment
to our troops overseas.
 
Back
Top