While I do not by any means intend this as an attack on Spyderco, who I consider to be one of the most reputable knife companies around, I take issue with their minimum advertised price policy.
1. Shouldn't retailers have the final say in what they are willing to sell a knife for? I am considering a Spyderco Military, and may buy it from Chai Cutlery simply because I like the attitude of the company, though I would end up paying more.
2. The policy creates hassle for buyers. Most deep-discount web-sites sell Spyderco knives for less than the "minimum allowable." In order to find out what the real price is, one generally has to send an e-mail to a mailbot, which then replies. This is extremely annoying.
3. I don't see this policy being effective. I personally know of one website advertising on the web-page, and not through "request-only" e-mail the Spyder Military for 102.67, another for 129.95, and most which claim to comply with the pricing policy at around 160.
In conclusion, I don't believe that this policy has any effect on the marketplace other than making it hard for ELUs like me to comparison shop for what are admittedly good deals at any price, and making it more difficult for honest retailers to compete with those who care less about their relationship with their suppliers.
Allow me to reemphasize that this is in no way a personal attack on Spyderco, but more in the vein of a forumite wondering about a policy which seems to have more disadvantages than advantages.
1. Shouldn't retailers have the final say in what they are willing to sell a knife for? I am considering a Spyderco Military, and may buy it from Chai Cutlery simply because I like the attitude of the company, though I would end up paying more.
2. The policy creates hassle for buyers. Most deep-discount web-sites sell Spyderco knives for less than the "minimum allowable." In order to find out what the real price is, one generally has to send an e-mail to a mailbot, which then replies. This is extremely annoying.
3. I don't see this policy being effective. I personally know of one website advertising on the web-page, and not through "request-only" e-mail the Spyder Military for 102.67, another for 129.95, and most which claim to comply with the pricing policy at around 160.
In conclusion, I don't believe that this policy has any effect on the marketplace other than making it hard for ELUs like me to comparison shop for what are admittedly good deals at any price, and making it more difficult for honest retailers to compete with those who care less about their relationship with their suppliers.
Allow me to reemphasize that this is in no way a personal attack on Spyderco, but more in the vein of a forumite wondering about a policy which seems to have more disadvantages than advantages.