Let me please start by saying I don't want to open up another mess like I did with my first post... 
I'm genuinely curious about something, and here's the short version: In order to sell enough knives to earn a living, does the average professional knife maker have to sacrifice any degree of "oomph" in the final product?
Now the long version...
I've made several dozen knives, sold a very few and given away most. I don't fancy myself anything more than a novice, a hobbyist. But if I think of what it requires out of me to make a knife, the supplies, the time, etc., versus what I can imagine selling a knife for, I'd make more money at a burger joint.
(With time and better equipment and a lot more experience, I'm sure I'd be more efficient with my time.)
We all have those dream blades we want to make, the "best I've got in me" projects. Maybe we've made one or two. But these ultimate displays of craftsmanship take so much more time and effort that we can't make every knife to that standard, sell it for what it's worth, and still make a living...
...or can we?
Or does the typical professional knife maker have his bread 'n' butter products that he sells by the dozen to keep the cash-flow coming, but which (due simply to economics) lack the punch of the really top-of-the-line stuff?
What I suppose I'm getting at is this: Can a knife maker make a living only making and selling knives where each and every one is his best effort to date (as time consuming as that may be), or does economics dictate that those are rare projects and "basic" knives are the bulk of his business?
I really am curious about the economics of this, and I'm not trying to imply any lack of quality in anyones work at all.
I'm genuinely curious about something, and here's the short version: In order to sell enough knives to earn a living, does the average professional knife maker have to sacrifice any degree of "oomph" in the final product?
Now the long version...
I've made several dozen knives, sold a very few and given away most. I don't fancy myself anything more than a novice, a hobbyist. But if I think of what it requires out of me to make a knife, the supplies, the time, etc., versus what I can imagine selling a knife for, I'd make more money at a burger joint.
(With time and better equipment and a lot more experience, I'm sure I'd be more efficient with my time.)
We all have those dream blades we want to make, the "best I've got in me" projects. Maybe we've made one or two. But these ultimate displays of craftsmanship take so much more time and effort that we can't make every knife to that standard, sell it for what it's worth, and still make a living...
...or can we?
Or does the typical professional knife maker have his bread 'n' butter products that he sells by the dozen to keep the cash-flow coming, but which (due simply to economics) lack the punch of the really top-of-the-line stuff?
What I suppose I'm getting at is this: Can a knife maker make a living only making and selling knives where each and every one is his best effort to date (as time consuming as that may be), or does economics dictate that those are rare projects and "basic" knives are the bulk of his business?
I really am curious about the economics of this, and I'm not trying to imply any lack of quality in anyones work at all.