Jim March
Knifemaker / Craftsman / Service Provider
- Joined
- Oct 7, 1998
- Messages
- 3,022
One of the things a high-knife can give you is "feel and handling". But how do you test this? It's naturally something open to "subjective feelings".
Here's my suggestion:
At a major show, line up a good selection of similar length knives...7" is fine. You pick about half dozen people at random from the audience. These people are not just testing, they're *competing* for a prize of some sort, say, a decent knife in the $50 to $100 range or whatever.
Each contestant is timed rolling each knife from a forward grip to a reverse and back again, forward to reverse to forward to reverse. Maybe more transitions, so that even if you're fractionally off with the stopwatch the differences will be obvious. You time that for each knife. You then add up the TOTAL time for all the knives each person tests, and the lowest total wins.
IF you really want to get hardball, do it all twice, once with the grips dry and again with the grips dipped in some sort of grease...Crisco or whatever.
Each contestant would be WELL motivated to roll and handle each knife as fast as possible. Rules would specify that tossing it and grabbing would be disallowed - they must maintain contact with the grip at all times, and use just one hand.
Drops would be counted against both the knife and the contestant.
This a good and objective test of "handling". It'd be a lot of fun and should attract a decent crowd.
Two details: do it on a rug or mat so that drops don't hurt the knives, and the contestants must not own any of the knives in question - that leaves me out!
Since cutting power isn't a factor and the blades won't take damage, obtaining test specimens should be simple - the dealers present should have no problems providing loaners. In the case of the Dogs, it wouldn't make any difference if the entry was an ATAK, ATAK2, DSU2 or WSP1.
I'll be completely honest here - my bet with no hesitation at all is on a Mad Dog.
Jim March
Here's my suggestion:
At a major show, line up a good selection of similar length knives...7" is fine. You pick about half dozen people at random from the audience. These people are not just testing, they're *competing* for a prize of some sort, say, a decent knife in the $50 to $100 range or whatever.
Each contestant is timed rolling each knife from a forward grip to a reverse and back again, forward to reverse to forward to reverse. Maybe more transitions, so that even if you're fractionally off with the stopwatch the differences will be obvious. You time that for each knife. You then add up the TOTAL time for all the knives each person tests, and the lowest total wins.
IF you really want to get hardball, do it all twice, once with the grips dry and again with the grips dipped in some sort of grease...Crisco or whatever.
Each contestant would be WELL motivated to roll and handle each knife as fast as possible. Rules would specify that tossing it and grabbing would be disallowed - they must maintain contact with the grip at all times, and use just one hand.
Drops would be counted against both the knife and the contestant.
This a good and objective test of "handling". It'd be a lot of fun and should attract a decent crowd.
Two details: do it on a rug or mat so that drops don't hurt the knives, and the contestants must not own any of the knives in question - that leaves me out!
Since cutting power isn't a factor and the blades won't take damage, obtaining test specimens should be simple - the dealers present should have no problems providing loaners. In the case of the Dogs, it wouldn't make any difference if the entry was an ATAK, ATAK2, DSU2 or WSP1.
I'll be completely honest here - my bet with no hesitation at all is on a Mad Dog.
Jim March