I thought I would post this in here since it pertains to a new Leatherman Charge I just purchased. The price was $90 which I think is kind of mid to high for a multi-tool. So when it finally arrived I was disappointed in the fit and finish it was in. One side of the pliers rubbed against the inside of the handle and left marks. Opening the tool was gritty (it soon went away) and the tools still clumped a little even though Leatherman supposedly fixed that. I've handled Waves and other Charges and they all exhibited the same type of rough finish.
Anyway, I guess my question is should we expect a higher level of quality from a leading brand when they themselves charge more than the competition? If the Charge was priced at $50.00 I would be more forgiving but maybe that is my price point when I do expect more.
Now Swiss Army is a great example of high quality for a cheap price (even MSRP and just not online pricing.) Other companies include Spyderco and Benchmade. These knives do cost a bit more but one you get them they are in outstanding finish. So why can't Leatherman have this same type of quality/finishing?
Anyway just want to see what peoples opinions are on quality vs. price.
Anyway, I guess my question is should we expect a higher level of quality from a leading brand when they themselves charge more than the competition? If the Charge was priced at $50.00 I would be more forgiving but maybe that is my price point when I do expect more.
Now Swiss Army is a great example of high quality for a cheap price (even MSRP and just not online pricing.) Other companies include Spyderco and Benchmade. These knives do cost a bit more but one you get them they are in outstanding finish. So why can't Leatherman have this same type of quality/finishing?
Anyway just want to see what peoples opinions are on quality vs. price.