Some time ago I had my car in the shop for several hours, and they took me to rent one for a day. The rental guy could not do it, because there was something about my insurance coverage. Didn't pay much attention then, since I had a book with me, and I waited instead.
However, due to coming job interviews, I need to be able to rent cars from airports, so I called my insurance agent who informed me that I don't have collision coverage (for the other vehicle), so that's why I was denied.
The agent mentioned two options, adding coverage to my policy, which would raise my payment from $34 to $46 a month, if inspection of vehicle was satisfactory (there is no damage to my vehicle).
The other option is purchasing such coverage from the rental agent, for the rental vehicle, which I have no idea how much that would cost.
Which is the better of two options? Thank you.
However, due to coming job interviews, I need to be able to rent cars from airports, so I called my insurance agent who informed me that I don't have collision coverage (for the other vehicle), so that's why I was denied.
The agent mentioned two options, adding coverage to my policy, which would raise my payment from $34 to $46 a month, if inspection of vehicle was satisfactory (there is no damage to my vehicle).
The other option is purchasing such coverage from the rental agent, for the rental vehicle, which I have no idea how much that would cost.
Which is the better of two options? Thank you.
