- Joined
- Jun 14, 2001
- Messages
- 1,256
I recently went to the optometrist to have my eyes examined since I have never (as far as I know) been to the optometrist before (32 years now!) and have been experiencing slight eyestrain due to working with computers most of the day. I was informed that both eyes were mildly astigmatic, and given a prescription for glasses. However, my vision is still 20/20 without glasses.
In case you're interested and understand this stuff, here's the prescription:
OD: (Sphere, Cylinder, Axis): +.50, -.75, 95
OS: (Sphere, Cylinder, Axis): +.50, -.50, 073
Actually, if you understood that prescription, can you tell me what it means?
Now, what I don't understand: when do I need to wear these glasses? I'm assuming that I should wear them while working at the computer, or watching TV, or reading. The thing is, when I wear the glasses, I do not notice an improvement in vision, since my vision is already fine. I have only worn the glasses for one day at work, and I think that my eyes are not as "tired" as they were before.
I guess the second question could be rephrased as "what is the point of wearing glasses when a person exhibits mild astigmatism but is not visually impaired...or at least thinks he's not visually impaired!
"
Thanks,
Matthew
In case you're interested and understand this stuff, here's the prescription:
OD: (Sphere, Cylinder, Axis): +.50, -.75, 95
OS: (Sphere, Cylinder, Axis): +.50, -.50, 073
Actually, if you understood that prescription, can you tell me what it means?
Now, what I don't understand: when do I need to wear these glasses? I'm assuming that I should wear them while working at the computer, or watching TV, or reading. The thing is, when I wear the glasses, I do not notice an improvement in vision, since my vision is already fine. I have only worn the glasses for one day at work, and I think that my eyes are not as "tired" as they were before.
I guess the second question could be rephrased as "what is the point of wearing glasses when a person exhibits mild astigmatism but is not visually impaired...or at least thinks he's not visually impaired!

Thanks,
Matthew