<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Willie Boy:
Have those who have had experience with Emerson's folders been pleased with their quality. Willlieboy@hotmail.com
</font>
Couple more thoughts, and opinions, attempts at honesty and as objective as I can be ... and I'm wearing Nomex.
Quality. Can be viewed in many ways.
I will add that if you are looking for good fit & finish of the various pieces/parts aside from the lockup, probably look elsewhere in general.
Fit/Finish issues:
1. the screws & clips are notorious for shedding their "black coating" with little provocation and with only time and casual handling. I can't believe Emerson hasn't figured out how to do this right yet. It makes them look worn quickly. Many people don't care about this. On a defensive folder, I overlook this pretty much since I don't carry my Mach-I daily.
2. The liners look like they are cut out very quickly on a bandsaw and just barely cleaned up with a grinding belt or wire wheel...the edges are not rough to the touch such that they snag or abrade, just rough looking, wavy... crude looking compared to almost any other liner lock I've handled really (I'm sure there are worse out there, none come to mind). Again, for a defensive folder, it does not affect performance, just looks crude.
3. My Mach-I was very obviously hand sharpened. The final edge was fairly consistently applied at say 35-40 degrees, but was over probably 45 degrees to maybe 50 degrees right at the tip, very steep, obviously done by hand and not very well. I reprofiled the whole cutting edge to 30 degrees on a Lansky which took some time, but there is no realistic way to grind enough metal off near the tip to get to 30 degrees...it would hose up the whole profile in that area...would take off too much metal.
Opinions on Design issues with Mach-I:
1. The chisel grind is, as always, and for purely aesthetic reasons according to my read of Emerson's web page, on the wrong side of the knife for right-handed utility use. That is a shame, as it keeps me from carrying the Mach-I more often (I carry it rarely actually).
2. The pocket clip is mounted such that far too much knife sticks out of your pocket, nearly an inch. The knife uses the standard, one-design-fits-all Emerson clip (I believe), when IMHO they should have designed a custom clip for this handle shape. One could argue the 1" protrusion makes it easier to retrieve the knife, buy IMO this is a solution to a non-existent problem for me. One could argue this clip keeps price down, and that is probably true, by how much I dunno, a dollar or two?
3. Blade grind is very stout, all the way to the tip, and good thing given my interpretation of the design goals.
4. Handle shape is great. Wouldn't mind having a wave.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I consider my Mach-I a purely defensive folder, one that I carry only when I'm headed downtown, into the city, into or knowingly across a bad neighborhood (rare).
And for a defensive folder 4" and under, I think it is a very good knife, mostly because the blade grind is stout all the way to the tip, and the handle design provides for a very deep index finger cutout, and therefore forms more of a guard than you can find on most any folder sold these days.
The blade grind stoutness & handle design are the two reasons why I bought the Mach-I and overlook the other issues for my stated purpose.
[This message has been edited by rdangerer (edited 06-07-2001).]