If a blade made of VG10 has a hardness of 58 and a blade of S30V also has a 58. Would they have the same or similar edge retention? Also what stops the manufacturer to heat treat to a higher hardness? Just looking to increase my knowledge regarding this. I am wondering if its worth buying a more expensive steel if its heat treated to the same hardness of a cheaper steel.
If everything was exactly the same as in 2 exact knives except for the steel then S30V would have better wear resistance than VG-10 due to the higher carbide content.
The difference would show up more on abrasive media so the perception may vary depending on actual use.
It's not just the hardness that matters however.
But hardness does factor into the overall edge stability and strength of the edge, the reason why S30V at 61 would hold an edge longer than S30V at 58 for example.
Or the difference between 1095 at the normal 56-58 compared to 64 as another example.
But in the end it's all a trade off so everything has to be considered in the end knife, how it's going to be used etc.
For harder use like choppers a lower hardness, lower alloy steel would be used over a higher hardness high alloy steel.
The reason why something like A2 would be a better choice for a large blade in a chopper than something like S30V all things being equal.
There are a lot of variables and steels that are designed for various tasks and some are more suited to certain things than others are.
Worth will vary depending on opinions and a persons budget etc.
The higher alloy steels cost more for a reason, higher alloy content costs money and so does different technologies.
Most of the steels that are used in knives have been adopted from other parts of the steel industry and adapted for knife use, and that's almost all of them except for a very small handful.