For the past six or seven months I've been dreaming about getting a Spyderco Millie for myself. I'd read up on what I felt was almost everything about them: specifications, hard-use, first-hand impressions, prices, and pros/cons. I finally decided about a week ago to order it around Christmas, and then yesterday I found a YouTube video discussing the idea that the Spyderco Military modern version has a weaker screw construction in the three main frame columns than say a Para 2.
From what I tried to gather, the Para 2 has both part of the column AND the screw nestled into the g10 handle, while the Military only has the screw recessed ("nestled") into the handle (no column part is inside the G10 handle). The YouTuber was saying how this is inherently weaker due to the forces applied on the knife blade, with particular reference to the handle's stop-bar.
This logic seems sound, but I've never handled one in real life, and I'm not sure if what he says about the screws/columns is true. I haven't been able to find anything about this - it's hard to find cons with Spyderco knives. I don't believe everything I see on the internet, so I'm asking you all for second opinions.
Questions:
1. What do you think about this weakness in the Military frame?
2. Will it hold up to hard use?
3. Would the Para 2 be a better hard-use folder for camping/carving because of this Military weakness?
4. Would the Para 2 be more user-serviceable than a Military due to the manufacturer's threads having Loctite?
Thanks so much
Here is the video, it's about 1 minute in and he rambles a whole bunch up until 5 minutes. I like liner locks and don't plan to do anything that will make the lock fail, so that is a non-issue. I'm not sure if I can post YouTube videos that aren't mine here, so mods please take it down if necessary.
From what I tried to gather, the Para 2 has both part of the column AND the screw nestled into the g10 handle, while the Military only has the screw recessed ("nestled") into the handle (no column part is inside the G10 handle). The YouTuber was saying how this is inherently weaker due to the forces applied on the knife blade, with particular reference to the handle's stop-bar.
This logic seems sound, but I've never handled one in real life, and I'm not sure if what he says about the screws/columns is true. I haven't been able to find anything about this - it's hard to find cons with Spyderco knives. I don't believe everything I see on the internet, so I'm asking you all for second opinions.
Questions:
1. What do you think about this weakness in the Military frame?
2. Will it hold up to hard use?
3. Would the Para 2 be a better hard-use folder for camping/carving because of this Military weakness?
4. Would the Para 2 be more user-serviceable than a Military due to the manufacturer's threads having Loctite?
Thanks so much
Here is the video, it's about 1 minute in and he rambles a whole bunch up until 5 minutes. I like liner locks and don't plan to do anything that will make the lock fail, so that is a non-issue. I'm not sure if I can post YouTube videos that aren't mine here, so mods please take it down if necessary.