- Joined
- Jul 8, 2001
- Messages
- 3,623
I received a phone call last weekend from an individual inquiring about buying a knife. He was a first time custom knife buyer inquirer and we talked quite extensively about what he was wanting, and then he asked why should he buy one from me instead of one from a well known production company.
His question really caught me off guard and I honestly didnt know what to say. He had become acquainted with seeing my work posted on Blade forums and said he was always quite impressed, but with all the discussions on the different forums about whos knife was better, he was totally confused. He said the latest conversation about knife performances coming down to nothing but hard science had him wondering how backyard knife makers with only a few thousand dollars invested could even begin to compete with the knowledge, technology and production of a knife that the big companies produced, after all theyve invested thousands and thousands of dollars and sought the knowledge of people that have taken their knowledge of metallurgy to extremes that I cant even imagine.
I again didnt know what to say. All I could do was tell him how I worked the steel to produce my knives and what my knives had shown me in my own personal tests. Having limited resources with no high dollar technology equipment like those bigger companies have, I just had to rely on performance tests to show how well a knife cut, held an edge, edge and sideways pressure to determine if the knife had sufficient strength to give ample performance when used as a knife, and when the knife dulled how easy it was to regain its sharpness.
After close to an hour of conversation and a very pleasant discussion I must add. He finally concluded that he would give it more throught and let me know what he decided one way or the other. He thanked me for my time and really appreciated my honesty and sincerity. In closing he said, as an outsider looking in, he felt knife makers were their own worst enemies, to make the claims and accusations about each other that they make, only turns a great deal of the public away from their profession because of the negativity and confusion it raises.
At that moment I couldnt agree with him more.
So heres 3 questions I have.
What would you tell someone that asked why should I buy your knife instead of someone else's?
If performance does come down to only hard science, and by that it means, if every maker doesnt heat treat in ways that produces the same end results according to science as we now know it, does that mean that everyone that produces knives with different end results according to science, are inferior?
Would he be smarter to buy a production knife where they have more then just performance testing, where they have scientific proof on whats happening inside the steel?
He gave me food for throught, so what do you think? By the way, he was looking for a using knife not a art or collectors item.
Thanks,
Bill
His question really caught me off guard and I honestly didnt know what to say. He had become acquainted with seeing my work posted on Blade forums and said he was always quite impressed, but with all the discussions on the different forums about whos knife was better, he was totally confused. He said the latest conversation about knife performances coming down to nothing but hard science had him wondering how backyard knife makers with only a few thousand dollars invested could even begin to compete with the knowledge, technology and production of a knife that the big companies produced, after all theyve invested thousands and thousands of dollars and sought the knowledge of people that have taken their knowledge of metallurgy to extremes that I cant even imagine.
I again didnt know what to say. All I could do was tell him how I worked the steel to produce my knives and what my knives had shown me in my own personal tests. Having limited resources with no high dollar technology equipment like those bigger companies have, I just had to rely on performance tests to show how well a knife cut, held an edge, edge and sideways pressure to determine if the knife had sufficient strength to give ample performance when used as a knife, and when the knife dulled how easy it was to regain its sharpness.
After close to an hour of conversation and a very pleasant discussion I must add. He finally concluded that he would give it more throught and let me know what he decided one way or the other. He thanked me for my time and really appreciated my honesty and sincerity. In closing he said, as an outsider looking in, he felt knife makers were their own worst enemies, to make the claims and accusations about each other that they make, only turns a great deal of the public away from their profession because of the negativity and confusion it raises.
At that moment I couldnt agree with him more.
So heres 3 questions I have.
What would you tell someone that asked why should I buy your knife instead of someone else's?
If performance does come down to only hard science, and by that it means, if every maker doesnt heat treat in ways that produces the same end results according to science as we now know it, does that mean that everyone that produces knives with different end results according to science, are inferior?
Would he be smarter to buy a production knife where they have more then just performance testing, where they have scientific proof on whats happening inside the steel?
He gave me food for throught, so what do you think? By the way, he was looking for a using knife not a art or collectors item.
Thanks,
Bill