- Joined
- Feb 26, 2002
- Messages
- 618
Lately, I have fallen in love with long and thin khukuries. I have three that are very similar in many ways but also very different:
an older 20.5 inch early shop 2 sirupati (27.7 ounces), a 22 inch recently bought Sher kobra (26.3 ounces), and a recently bought 20 inch Bura sirupati (22.4 ounces).
The shop 2 sirupati and the Sher kobra have almost the same profile. So much so that the shop 2 sirupati fits comfortably and snugly in the kobra scabbard (the kobra's handle is a little longer and hence there isn't a great deal of difference in blade lengths). There are three main differences. One is that the shop 2 sirupati is much thicker along the spine (to be expected). The second is the shape of the cutting edge. The shop 2 sirupati has close to a convex edge, the kobra more of a sabre edge (ie. V shaped). The third is that the older shop 2 sirupati has a pointier, meaner looking end to the blade than any other khukuri I own (it looks scary). I am sure that if I placed a photograph of it on the forum, many people would think that the shop 2 sirupati was a present day kobra (except for the buttplate and engravings on the blade). In fact, there is a picture of it on the Cantina. It is one I bought from John Powell around the Easter period and John put a picture on the forum along with the other khukuries he was selling at that time.
In comparison to the other two, the recently bought Bura sirupati has a hollow ground, thinner edged blade that has a wider profile and is more like (relatively speaking) a stretched out world war II shaped blade. It is beautifully made, but then one expects that of something made by Bura. On looking back through the HI forums, it has the typical profile of recent 20 inch sirupatis. I have tried cutting two inch branches with it and it sliced through them happily.
When I have done a search back through the H.I. forum, there does seem to be a trend towards wider profiled (ie. bigger belly), less pointy, and thinner hollow ground blades in the recent models compared to earlier versions (I believe this is true of World War II style blades as well as the longer sirupatis). I personally like the sleeker profiled, pointier ended, and convex edged shop 2 sirupati the best of the three I own, but love them all. It looks tough and instills confidence.
My questions for HI forumites who have been around the Cantina for some years (hence more "mature" than the rest of us):
1. Are the differences I have noticed just accounted for by the normal variation that occurs in something that is uniquely hand crafted. Or, am I correct in noticing the changes in the shapes of same model khukuries over the years. Were the older HI models sleeker and pointier in appearance with a more convex edge than the same model newer versions (I think Yvsa has noted the convex edge change a few times before)?
2. I have no doubt that the present Khukuries are well made, but are their blades as tough as the older HI blades? Specifically, what will my convex edged Shop 2 sirupati be capable of doing that my Bura sirupati won't be able to do? With care and no twisting of the blade, is a very well made thin, hollow ground edge still a very strong edge for normal chopping - as strong as a convex edged blade?

an older 20.5 inch early shop 2 sirupati (27.7 ounces), a 22 inch recently bought Sher kobra (26.3 ounces), and a recently bought 20 inch Bura sirupati (22.4 ounces).
The shop 2 sirupati and the Sher kobra have almost the same profile. So much so that the shop 2 sirupati fits comfortably and snugly in the kobra scabbard (the kobra's handle is a little longer and hence there isn't a great deal of difference in blade lengths). There are three main differences. One is that the shop 2 sirupati is much thicker along the spine (to be expected). The second is the shape of the cutting edge. The shop 2 sirupati has close to a convex edge, the kobra more of a sabre edge (ie. V shaped). The third is that the older shop 2 sirupati has a pointier, meaner looking end to the blade than any other khukuri I own (it looks scary). I am sure that if I placed a photograph of it on the forum, many people would think that the shop 2 sirupati was a present day kobra (except for the buttplate and engravings on the blade). In fact, there is a picture of it on the Cantina. It is one I bought from John Powell around the Easter period and John put a picture on the forum along with the other khukuries he was selling at that time.
In comparison to the other two, the recently bought Bura sirupati has a hollow ground, thinner edged blade that has a wider profile and is more like (relatively speaking) a stretched out world war II shaped blade. It is beautifully made, but then one expects that of something made by Bura. On looking back through the HI forums, it has the typical profile of recent 20 inch sirupatis. I have tried cutting two inch branches with it and it sliced through them happily.
When I have done a search back through the H.I. forum, there does seem to be a trend towards wider profiled (ie. bigger belly), less pointy, and thinner hollow ground blades in the recent models compared to earlier versions (I believe this is true of World War II style blades as well as the longer sirupatis). I personally like the sleeker profiled, pointier ended, and convex edged shop 2 sirupati the best of the three I own, but love them all. It looks tough and instills confidence.
My questions for HI forumites who have been around the Cantina for some years (hence more "mature" than the rest of us):
1. Are the differences I have noticed just accounted for by the normal variation that occurs in something that is uniquely hand crafted. Or, am I correct in noticing the changes in the shapes of same model khukuries over the years. Were the older HI models sleeker and pointier in appearance with a more convex edge than the same model newer versions (I think Yvsa has noted the convex edge change a few times before)?
2. I have no doubt that the present Khukuries are well made, but are their blades as tough as the older HI blades? Specifically, what will my convex edged Shop 2 sirupati be capable of doing that my Bura sirupati won't be able to do? With care and no twisting of the blade, is a very well made thin, hollow ground edge still a very strong edge for normal chopping - as strong as a convex edged blade?
