Random comparison with an SH-E

Joined
Oct 23, 2002
Messages
1,147
Over this last weekend I ended up having some fun in the backwoods. (Yes there is something resembling wilderness in CA) I took along my SH-E and as a comparison for chopping also brought along a Vietnam Tactical Tomahawk, for a comparison of cutting for utility purposes (i.e. whittling sticks with the kids I brought with me) I also had a Dawson model 98 and some fixed bladed Kershaw I can’t remember the name of.

The tasks performed were cutting branches up to 3 inches thick for a proposed shelter, whittling sticks (interpret that as fun and campfire preparation), cutting cord and even minor food preparation.

The SH-E outperformed them all by a significant margin! The Tomahawk, while intimidating and perhaps a better tool for defense was unable to chop half as well as the SH-E. I found myself having to swing harder and more often to get through similar diameter branches. The two other knives, one 1/4” thick and the other 1/8” thick steel were still no match for the SH-E’s prowess in slicing through or carving braches of any shape or size. The kids were in fact amazed at how fast I could cut through a branch they were struggling with and turn it into let’s say a spear or fuel for a fire. Admittedly the SH-E is a bigger knife than the others so having it outperform them in chopping was no surprise but handling the knife for smaller cutting tasks was not only easy it was impressive. :cool:

Once home I cleaned all the knives and hawk up easily enough and even though the SH-E was used more than any other tool it showed no damage at all and is still shaving sharp. The other knives have very small nicks on the edges, no damage to the hawk.

You can all flame me now as my camera battery died before I could take any pics of the knives, sorry! Next time I will bring battery backup! I have nice pics of the woods though, but those are not as pretty when they don’t contain any knives, doh!
:eek:
 
Holy Crap! You can't be saying that a KNIFE chops better than a [COLOR=ROYAL BLUE]HATCHET/AXE[/COLOR]!

Mtnclimber... just so you know, before the firestorm begins... I'm here for you.:D
 
I disagree I went out this last weekend with a Gerber Back Paxe and an Assault Shaker. The Shaker just couldn't keep up even with it being tied to a pole for added momentum. ;)

Sorry Les, I couldn't resist. :D :D :D
 
Mtnclimber69 :

Admittedly the SH-E is a bigger knife than the others so having it outperform them in chopping was no surprise but handling the knife for smaller cutting tasks was not only easy it was impressive.

Yes, the edges are small in cross section compared to tactical knives in general and thus fare well even when compared to knives optomized for much lighter work.

The true performance advantage of the Tomahawk in regards to chopping will be seen on very large wood. Work through a piece of 6-8" thick wood with it and the SH-E and notice the change in performance.

Of course this isn't a common requirement, which is why in general large blades can be very strong for wood working outside of dedicated logging.

-Cliff
 
Spearhead and Cliff, thanks for backing me up... I will say the hawk was fun to carry and certainly more tempting to throw at things, but I have been testing the function of what I have so that as I develop better outdoor skills I have the best tools for the job in hand.... without having to carry 10 pounds of steel.

My next test might include chopping thicker wood as Cliff suggested the difference would then be more apparent. However I am already sold on leaving the hawk behind for all but the most remote trips I take.

I think once I get my hands on a Buffalo Soldier to go with my SH-E I may have the winning combo of knives... then again I wouldn't want the others getting jealous and so I would give equal time to the AS, PBFs, BM, etc... :D
 
Back
Top