- Joined
- Jul 19, 2006
- Messages
- 812
I'm interested in getting one of the aformentioned blades, and would like a few questions answered first, so as to make an informed decision. They are both a quarter inch thick, but the Ranger RD-4 is made of 5160 carbon steel, and the RAT RC-5 is made of 1095 carbon steel.
First off, am I right in saying that 5160 is generally tougher than 1095 but has less edge retention?
I want as tough a knife as possible (no, I can't afford a Busse
), but I like the ergonomics and looks of the RC-5 better than the RD-4.
My question is this: Is 5160 that much tougher than 1095 that it is worth sacrificing the looks, edge retention, and ergonomics of the RC-5 to get a tougher blade? In short, just how much tougher IS 5160 than 1095?
Thanks in advance
First off, am I right in saying that 5160 is generally tougher than 1095 but has less edge retention?
I want as tough a knife as possible (no, I can't afford a Busse
My question is this: Is 5160 that much tougher than 1095 that it is worth sacrificing the looks, edge retention, and ergonomics of the RC-5 to get a tougher blade? In short, just how much tougher IS 5160 than 1095?
Thanks in advance