- Joined
- Jan 28, 2006
- Messages
- 7,035
Since few, if any, of the guys here only use one brand of knife, I'd like to ask for a comparison.
For anyone who has used both the RC-3/4 and Bark River Aurora or Northstar, how does the RC stack up?
The Aurora/Northstar seem to have the advantage of a less-wide blade with the point dropped to be in line with the centerline of the handle. This would seem to facilitate "knife drilling" better than the higher point of the RC knives.
Is this a real advantage, or just a theoretical one? (I figure someone will know, as there's plenty of pics of RCs being used for shelter building ansd the like).
The RCs seem to have the advantage of the flat grind. The Aurora/Northstar have .170" thick blades (nearly the same as the .187" of the RC-4, and distinctly thicker than the .125" of the RC-3), so even thought he BKRTs have a nice convex grind, it seems the RCs will be the better slicers. Would this be a good assessment?
For anyone who has used both the RC-3/4 and Bark River Aurora or Northstar, how does the RC stack up?
The Aurora/Northstar seem to have the advantage of a less-wide blade with the point dropped to be in line with the centerline of the handle. This would seem to facilitate "knife drilling" better than the higher point of the RC knives.
Is this a real advantage, or just a theoretical one? (I figure someone will know, as there's plenty of pics of RCs being used for shelter building ansd the like).
The RCs seem to have the advantage of the flat grind. The Aurora/Northstar have .170" thick blades (nearly the same as the .187" of the RC-4, and distinctly thicker than the .125" of the RC-3), so even thought he BKRTs have a nice convex grind, it seems the RCs will be the better slicers. Would this be a good assessment?