RC-3 Serrated vs RC-3 Plain Edge

Joined
Feb 25, 2008
Messages
396
Guys I need your help and I can't decide. I climb so having serrations really appeals to me.........but man can they be a pain in the butt to sharpen. How hard are the RC-3 Serrations to sharpen? Are they worth it?

Also, do you recommend the jump sheath over the standard sheath?
 
You will probably get a thousand and one responses about how folks hate serrations and prefer plain edges. I generally fall into that camp, but I find serrated knives also have their uses.

I have a serrated RC-3 and I like the way it performs. Good at doing what serrations are supposed to do, i.e. cut rope etc. To my surprise, the RC 3 was also quite good at wood work and did fuzzies much better than I expected it.

The RC serrations differ from those of other companies like Spyderco. They are sized so that you can sharpen them with a standard 1/8" round file. Alternatively, the sharpmaker works extremely well. Because the RC serrations are wider and flatter, you can even sharpen them on a flat stone. You sharpen them like you would any plain blade. I thought this was hog wash until I tried it. It works, albeit, sharpening them using the corners of the sharpmaker rod does a better job IMO.

Unfortunately, I always make things more complicated for myself then they need to be. So I convexed the plain portion of the edge of my RC-3 and sharpen that part as I would do a convex knife and then sharpen the serrated part with the corners of the sharpmaker.

It is a great little knife and perfectly suited for climbing. The sheath is incredibly versatile. It will do wood work and camp chores if called upon to do so. Maybe not as brilliantly as a puuku, but good enough and effortless enough to not make your regret having it during camping. My RC-3 comes along with me on a lot of trips even though I have a lot of blades to choose from.

DSC_0029-9.jpg


DSC_0027-3.jpg


DSC_0025-6.jpg
 
On a blade the size of the RC3, Id opt for no serrations. Just dont think the blade is long enough to split up between the 2. Id go PE, and convex it.
 
These serrations changed my opinion on serrations. Being able to sharpen them easily by only sharpening on one side makes them very easy to maintain.
 
On a blade the size of the RC3, Id opt for no serrations. Just dont think the blade is long enough to split up between the 2. Id go PE, and convex it.

Thats a good point.....I didn't take that into consideration. What about the sheaths they offer?
 
You mean the one with the Molle back?

I dont see a need, the other one works great w/o it.
 
Yup, the molle back is what I was talking about.

(Side note: Is that a Karate Monkey or a Monocog?)
 
Neither brother.... Its a Surly 1x1 I built a couple months ago. Best bike Ive ever owned. I love it. :cool:

100_1622.jpg


Yeah man, no need IMO for the Molle back. I think the RC3 carries well in the regular sheath, or around the neck or on a merc harness type rig. :thumbup:
 
Serrations are great for cutting rope, and I have given several on my sailing buddy’s serrated knives for that reason.

But a sharp knife will cut rope with ease.

On a half serrated blade I think I would prefer the plain edge to be down toward the handle, but they are never made that way.

Serrations do have the advantage of staying sharp long after the plain edge has been thoroughly dulled on a poorly maintained knife.

But that’s usually not a problem for a knife nut.

All that said, I have been paid to remove serrations on quite a few well used knives.
 
Back
Top