Reacquainting with my Sharpmaker

Joined
Feb 13, 2000
Messages
370
It's been a while since I've had to sharpen any of my knives. Or been near my sharpmaker for that matter since it's at home and not in my dorm. Since then, I've forgotten a few details (and have no VCR to play the instructional video anymore) and figured that while I can't fully remember the way I used to sharpen stuff would be a good time to get some tips to improve my sharpening.

First off, is it corners or flats first?

Second, I know that some members will sharpen one side until a burr forms. If my understanding is correct, this guarantees that you've moved enough steel on one side. So what should be done to test for a burr and with the other side afterwards? The more details the better as actually putting some of these concepts into practice is totally new to me.
 
The corners are more aggressive and thus usually followed by the flats. You can feel a burr with your fingers which is also a nice way to cut yourself if you are not careful, or do a light shaving check, it will be very aggressive on one side but not on the other. Usually the other side is sharpened until the burr fully forms and then it is cut off.

-Cliff
 
I've always followed this format:

knife that is really dull--
1. Grey Corners (10-20 per side)
2. Grey Flats (10-20 per side)
3. White Corners (10-20 per side)
4. White Flats (if desired) (10-20 per side)

Knife that needs to have work done on its angles

pre 1. 30 degree Grey Corners
pre 2. 30 degree Grey Flats

post
1. 45 degree Grey Corners
2. 45 degree Grey Flats
3. 45 degree white corners
4. 45 degree white flats


I normally use the 30 degree measurements for my EDC, as I like the smaller angle for my EDC. For general knives, I tend to use the 45 degree. It all depends on what you want to do, as you can still obtain a good sharp knife with a 45 degree angle.
 
So after doing some more reading, my hypothesis is that sharpening on one side til a burr forms, then the other, then going to smoother stones if desired, then finally stropping would be a good way to go. Kind of want some confirmation before I do something that may require more sharpening to fix a mistake. Along with getting information on where to get a strop if so . . .
 
slugfast said:
I've always followed this format:

knife that is really dull--
1. Grey Corners (10-20 per side)
2. Grey Flats (10-20 per side)
3. White Corners (10-20 per side)
4. White Flats (if desired) (10-20 per side)

Knife that needs to have work done on its angles

pre 1. 30 degree Grey Corners
pre 2. 30 degree Grey Flats

post
1. 45 degree Grey Corners
2. 45 degree Grey Flats
3. 45 degree white corners
4. 45 degree white flats


I normally use the 30 degree measurements for my EDC, as I like the smaller angle for my EDC. For general knives, I tend to use the 45 degree. It all depends on what you want to do, as you can still obtain a good sharp knife with a 45 degree angle.


This is the sharpening sequence I use. I don't go to the next step until the edge is very sharp. I don't count strokes. You must make sure the rods doesn't load up with steel dust. If they do you can clean them with cleanser.

I like the 40 degree (this is what my Sharpmaker has, not 45 degrees) setting to sharpen the tiny primary micro-bevel. 40 degrees is acute enough to make a very sharp knife edge yet it has enough meat (steel) behind it so it won't chip out with hard use. The large secondary bevel I use is at the 30 degree setting but I very rarely have to rebevel the edge (called profiling or reprofiling in knife sharpening lingo). If you mark the very bottom of the edge with magic marker you should see it being removed by the rods set at the 40 degree setting. If this doesn't happen then you need to drop back to the 30 degree setting to reprofile. The magic marker trick is good because you see exactly where the rods are removing steel on the blade edge.

Here is a link with some good pictures. I would suggest using the above sequence but don't go to the next step unless the knife is very sharp at the current step. I'm assuming you know how to tell when a knife is very sharp.

If you are sharpening serrated edges just use the corners of the triangle rods and go slowly letting them ride in and out of the serrations. You can sharpen both sides of the serrated blade without doing anything wrong. In fact it seems to increase the cuting ability I have found.

http://forums.egullet.com/index.php?showtopic=26036
 
Not really if you sharpen a pretty dull knife on 1 side only until you get a burr you can move the edge off center. Make sure you do ruffly equal strokes on each side. exsample do 50 strokes on side A if no burr forums or if one does do 50 strokes on side B. Repete until there is a burr along the hole edge. Note 50 strokes per side is a number I just pulled out of the air use what ever number you want.
 
db said:
Not really if you sharpen a pretty dull knife on 1 side only until you get a burr you can move the edge off center.

Generally not with one sharpening, edges, the blunt part that you have to reset, are a small fraction of a mm wide and this is also conteracted by the honing on the other side which cuts the bevel back. Joe noted this years back in the FAQ when it was brought up that he just alternates sides randomally when he starts. Many knives are really uneven in bevel anyway, I have seen few which were prefectly ground.

-Cliff
 
db said:
Not really if you sharpen a pretty dull knife on 1 side only until you get a burr you can move the edge off center. Make sure you do ruffly equal strokes on each side. exsample do 50 strokes on side A if no burr forums or if one does do 50 strokes on side B. Repete until there is a burr along the hole edge. Note 50 strokes per side is a number I just pulled out of the air use what ever number you want.

That's a good point. You want the edge centered as much as possible (unless it is serrated).

New knife users, I have found, are very good at following directions. If you tell them to do 40 strokes per side and move to the next step they will do that. This can result in frustration if they are sharpening a dull knife with good steel at a higher HRC value. It might take 140 strokes to raise a burr before they move to the next step. That was the point I was trying to make.
 
Cliff your just wrong. if a person sharpens away on one side only on a pretty dull knife they will move the edge off center. If the knife is really dull this can really move it over alot in just 1 sharpening. If all the work to get a burr is done on one side your making alot of work for yourself on the other side to recenter the edge. You are also removing alot more steel than you need to. It is much easier and quicker to work both sides to keep things fairly even. There is no such thing as a perfectly centered edge however, that is no reason to not try and keepit as close as you can. If for no other reason than it's just less work to do it that way.
 
db said:
If the knife is really dull this can really move it over alot in just 1 sharpening.

Look straight into an edge which is dulled, that thickness is the maximum amount it can be moved off center assuming you do all the work on one side. That thickness, even if you take the knife down to 5% of optimal sharpness is usually far less than 0.1 mm. Most people don't generally let their knives get that dull, it isn't safe to use them at that point, I do it for comparative work only and thus in general the honing is actually much less. I have measured it, and have been doing it for years.

This was discussed in detail as a side issue on rec.knives when Swaim brought up the idea of steeling vs honing (years ago) and the actual amount of metal being removed per honing was found to be insignificant. Of course if this wasn't the case and you could rapidly move bevels off side, they would also race up the knife in the same manner and you would visually note the knife getting narrower with each sharpening. This is of course trivially false.

As noted this is an old arguement bought up years ago when Joe was first proposing the one side burr sharpening method in the FAQ. The solution to it as noted is to just alter the side in a random manner. Of course if you note that the edge has moved off center an extreme amount and actually interfers with cutting (which I have never seen) you would make a note to start on the necessary side until it is corrected. A solution however to a nonexistant problem.

There are also by the way, types of cutting which wear the bevel on one side more than the other and will force the edge off center if you sharpened equally on both sides after such use.

-Cliff
 
Cliff you seem to be having a problem understanding my posts. I am not sure how to simplify my point any more than I already have. Maybe you need to have your brother or mother read them to you before responding.
“
Cliff said.
Most people don't generally let their knives get
That dull, it isn't safe to use them at that point,

Are you kidding me? How do you know how dull most people let their knives get. From what I’ve seen most people’s knives are duller than spoons, and very few even know or even try to sharpen them.

Cliff said…
This was discussed in detail as a side issue on rec.knives when Swaim brought up the idea of steeling vs honing (years ago) and the actual amount of metal
I’ve been reading rec.knives for years since at least 1994. I respect a lot of what Mike had said and agree with a lot of it. However, if he ever did say honing on 1 side and 1 side only until you get a burr doesn’t move the edge over to 1 side he’s wrong as well.

Cliff said…
As noted this is an old arguement bought up years ago when Joe was first proposing the one side burr sharpening method in the FAQ. The solution to it as
noted is to just alter the side in a random manner.
Umm that is what I’ve been saying in my posts. Like I said have someone read them to you before responding.

Cliff says…
A solution however to a nonexistant problem.
“nonexistant problem”? Grinding on 1 side only and moving the edge over has been reported by many people on these forums. I have even seen Joe the writer of the FAQ give the same advice that I have in this thread. If I cared to look I probably would find you have as well. Again try and understand what your argueing against before you respond.
 
Getting back to my query . . .

So obviously it seems that I might do some experimentation myself with magnification. So any comments/suggestions about the strop?
 
db said:
How do you know how dull most people let their knives get.

For perspective, a sharp edge is actually about 0.1 micron thick, 0.1 mm is a 1000 times thicker, that is obviously really dull. If your knives are actually thicker still, then before warning about off center honing I would advise about using knives in such a condition, sharpen more frequently. If your knives have visible denting, or corrosion or chipping on the edge, then yes you could visibly change the look of the profile if you ground all the damage off on one side but then you are profiling not sharpening and the Sharpmaker which is being discussed here is a poor tool for that so I would suggest other methods.

However, if he ever did say honing on 1 side and 1 side only until you get a burr doesn’t move the edge over to 1 side he’s wrong as well.

Yeah, Mike didn't have much practical experience, he tended to say things all the time with no actual data to support it. In that partcular thread we were discussing the effect of honing, how much metal was being removed and he was talking about what he had seen observing the deposits on the stones (ceramic rods in particular) and I listed the numbers I had and did some calculations based on them and magnification inspections. He was arguing for the lack of support for needing to use a steel to preserve a knife due to the minimal amount of material stones remove, the fundamentals apply to this topic.

I have even seen Joe the writer of the FAQ give the same advice that I have in this thread.

I was around when it was first brought up as I noted in the above. I was also around years before it was brought up and it wasn't a concern. It is possible if you always start on the one side, and especially if you over grind, that over time you would note that the edge is getting lopsided and moving towards a chisel grind. However this is a really extreme case.

I sharpen probably about a 1000 knives a year including my personal ones and ones for friends and family (including such things as replacement blades which you can sharpen 10-20 in a day). Many of who are tradesmen and fishermen so tend to heavily use their knives. Some of my knives are so warn the knives are visibly smaller. I never pay attention to it and have never seen it happen.

Even the Busse Basic #7 which Patrick worn down to a nub by sharpening it on a belt sander on a regular basis was not adversely effected (in that respect) and I can guarantee you he had no consideration of what sides he started or finished with, he never even payed attention to the belt that were on it, and I would put the state of his knives when dull up against anyones considering what he cuts with them (or attempts to) on a regular basis.

I can give you his cell phone number and you can ask him the specifics about how many passes he did on one side vs another and the effect it had on the knife. Just email me if you want. Let me know when you plan to call him as I would like to be there because his responce is going to be entertaining.

Simon Yu said:
..then finally stropping would be a good way to go. Kind of want some confirmation before I do something that may require more sharpening to fix a mistake. Along with getting information on where to get a strop if so . . .

Stropping has a number of benefits, you can really cheaply get fine abrasives, and there is slop to it which helps set the very edge. Compare the cost of a 0.5 micron stropping paste to a similar stone, the paste is a dollar and the hone a hundred (roughly). Strops also give and relax the angle tolerance and thus many people find it helps.

Generally you want an edge very sharp before stropping, as burrs will crack or break off rather than be cleanly removed. Some steels like 52100 grind so easily that this isn't a problem but it can be for a lot of stainless so when you start stropping the sharpness goes down, then gradually comes back up and you also tend to lose a lot of slicing aggression for little gain in push cutting performance.

Generally the best method is a few light passes, I have discussed the results in detail in the review of the South Fork noting what happens to the sharpness and the cutting ability with continued passes on the strop. This is with S30V, as noted other steels will have similar but different behavior.

-Cliff
 
Isn’t it interesting how this “nonexistant problem” shows up so offen. Why just today this “nonexistant problem” was asked about in another thread. Take a look at post 18, 20, and 21, in this thread.
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=403829
I’m sorry I’ve been trying to help people avoid a “nonexistant problem”. Like I said much earlier “It is much easier and quicker to work both sides to keep things
fairly even. There is no such thing as a perfectly centered edge however, that is no reason to not try and keepit as close as you can. If for no other
reason than it's just less work to do it that way.”
 
I suppose the next question that comes to mind is how to remove the burr before going to the strop. I know that the angle needs to be changed and light pressure used, but I'm unclear as to whether to increase the angle by angling the blade away from the stone or decreasing it by slanting it closer to the rod.
 
Simon Yu said:
I suppose the next question that comes to mind is how to remove the burr before going to the strop.

Increase the angle by tilting the blade away from the hone, some steels which are prone to burr formation may require this angle to be very large. If you are sharpening at 15 for example it could be as large as 30. Only a few passes in general are needed but on some steels I have had to go up to ten, and on some really problematic ones you sometimes have to recut the primary again and then remove the burr. If you can reduce the burr down significantly some times a stop may remove the last bit, so if you are having trouble on the hones it is worth a try to see what the strop will do.

db said:
Why just today this “nonexistant problem” was asked about in another thread. Take a look at post 18, 20, and 21, in this thread.

As I noted in that thread, when you reduce edge angles and sharpen to very wide bevels you will often see bevels wider on one side than the other due to the primary grind being uneven. In reprofiling it should be obvious that the difference in width seen could not be due to the small amount of metal removed creating the actual burr, less than 0.1 mm as noted. Again as I noted in that thread, on machetes you can see this get very lopsided, one side is half an inch high and the other side over an inch. The edge by the way will be centered, if you were to make the edge even in width at the same angle it would actually then have to be cut off center. Lots of smaller knives are like this and have the same issues to lesser extents.

-Cliff
 
Bringing this back up for another guy with an “nonexistant problem”
Wile an uneven primary grind could be why this shows on a blade as uneven, it is unlikly. I't is more likely from sharpening on one side more than the other. That is why you notice it after you do just that.
Edited not to fix grammer but to add..
It's even more unlikly with Sebenzas and benchmades and even fair quality production folders that an uneven primary grind is the fault.
 
Back
Top