Rebuild the Twin Towers!

Joined
May 3, 2002
Messages
6,192
This is the best commentary I've read in a long time. I couldn't NOT share this:

• May 12, 2005 | 9:20 a.m. ET
Rebuild them! (Keith Olbermann)

They were just a few feet tall and not even as solidly constructed as the old architectural models my father would sometimes bring home from the office for me when I was a kid - but they affected me in a way I never would have imagined.

The towers of The World Trade Center.

They were in our studios yesterday, plastic recreations of the originals, dragged in by groups who are taking advantage of the security concerns about the planned “Freedom Tower” to push the simple idea that the best way to memorialize the victims and restore the community is to re-build the towers exactly as they stood until three and a half years ago.

They’re absolutely right - with one minor caveat. One of the towers should be exactly 229 feet, four inches shorter than the other. I’ll explain why in a bit.

Before that, I have a confession to make. My first job in television was in the lobby of WTC #1 (as they used to call it; I never heard “North Tower” or “South Tower” until the day of the attacks). That’s where CNN’s New York bureau was located until 1984 - behind a two-story thick glass wall that, when we put the studio lights on, made us look like a very cheap high school science experiment.

I hated the place. I mean, if you work in the city’s tallest building and you’re stuck in the lobby, you develop a mean streak about it. The place was comically understaffed (the first two years, we didn’t have a receptionist - whoever was closest to the front door opened it, for staffers, visitors, and bag ladies alike). The commute - from almost anywhere else in the city - was wearying. The mall beneath the towers was a desert, and the neighborhood a wasteland (the dilapidated old West Side Highway still stood - kinda - out the doors to West Street, and the only amusements were those days when big hunks of it would crash to the roadway below). Worst of all, the air conditioning used to go out on an almost regular basis. You’ve never known heat until you’ve worked in a television studio without ventilation. Suits pressed while you wear them.

As I hinted above, my father’s an architect, so I had inherited the typical aesthetic condescension of his profession. What the heck was this Trade Center design supposed to be? The world’s largest salute to Oblong, perhaps - with the faux-gothic grillwork on the outside tacked on in a fruitless attempt to class up the joint.

I went in there to clean out my desk on the afternoon of Saturday, March 31, 1984. I would not return until September 11, 2001.

Suddenly, of course, the sense of drudgery that only a disliked workplace can represent had been transformed into the terrible meaning we all now intuit. And that gaudy grillwork - the only remains standing - stuck out against the smoking pyre of the place with the starkness, and the sudden antiquity, of the Roman Colloseum. The feelings, I needn’t tell you. 40 days as a street reporter in and around the scene of the catastrophe managed to reshape even my memories of the buildings I once dismissed as merely a great deal of weight sitting on top of the place I did my sportscasts.

And as the searing pain of those first few weeks gradually gave way to sadness and thoughts of what, if anything, should be placed on this most hallowed ground, the only thing, the only thing that seemed to make sense, was the towers recreated, as originally designed, oblong boxiness and all - with that one minor caveat about the 229 feet and four inches. I wasn’t among the voices insisting that only rebuilding it as it was would show we hadn’t been “beaten” - merely that all other forms of construction there would offend the sensibility, and diminish, not enhance, the remembrance.

I hadn’t thought much of it lately. The process of healing is a regretful one in a way. We’re designed to forget - not forget the whole, but merely the sharp edges. I hadn’t forgotten the Trade Center, nor my three years in it. Nor had I forgotten the fact that some creatures had managed to use two planes that each contained a friend of mine (Ace Bailey, the former hockey player and executive, was on one, and Tom Pecorelli, who had been one of the studio cameramen for my shows at Fox Sports, was on the other), to kill so many innocents in the buildings, including two college classmates of mine (Mike Tanner and Eamon McEneaney, who happened also to have been the quarterback and the receiver for Cornell University in the first sporting event I ever actually got paid to cover).

Those things hadn’t passed, and they won’t. Nor will the simple reality that it all happened - a reality that will still of a morning unexpectedly punch me in the stomach, or make me wonder for a moment if something so horrible could’ve actually occurred, or if I must have imagined it in a consummate moment in a dream from an endless night.

But I’d forgotten about the rightness of putting the Trade Center back where it stood. Forgotten it, until I saw that model yesterday, and it all came back to me.

The “Freedom Tower” design wasn’t somebody trying to be disrespectful; it was just the unavoidable project of an architectural trend in which everything must look like somebody just built it with a kid’s erector set. The Hearst/Conde Nast building is just getting finished not far from my home, and it’s that same style: Attach Beam A to Side Support B, Tap Support B with a pen to make sure it sounds as tinny as it looks.

But it was wrong.

The best way - the only way - to further soothe the pain is, as the proponents including Donald Trump are suggesting, to rebuild it as it was. Which brings me to my caveat.

I’d use the original blueprints and design the “new” Trade Center exactly as it had been. But I’d insist that one of the towers be exactly 229 feet, four inches shorter than the other. It’s an uncomplicated gimmick to guarantee remembrance. Because, as long as these new towers would stand, someone unaware would ask, “why is one of them shorter than the other?” Whereupon an old-timer could explain, solemnly, that the difference between the heights of the towers is intentional - it’s exactly 2,752 inches.

One inch for each of the victims.

It’s all the memorial we really need.

E-mail: KOlbermann@msnbc.com
Watch Keith each weeknight at 8 p.m. ET MSNBC
 
You know what: while the events of 9/11 were an inexcusable crime and an act of war... the twin towers were ugly.

Besides, to rebuild the towers would be unamerican. Yes, it would. Albert Einstein said, "The American lives for the future. Life for him is always becoming, never being." To rebuilt the towers the way they were would be living in the past. It would be about getting back to being, not about becoming.

Others have suggested leaving the site empty. But that would be unamerican too. We are a nation of builders. We started on the east coast, we built our way across this vast continent all the way to the west coast, and now we're filling in. We are always becoming and always building. The people killed on 9/11 were builders. Some were, at the fatefull moment of impact, building business empires. Others were just trying to build a better life for themselves and their families. But they were all building. For us to leave that site empty would be a disgrace to their industry.

Their memorial will be a new World Trade Center, a bigger, better, more beautiful World Trade Center. And we will fill it with commerce and industry even more than the old one. And every deal that is negotiated, every order placed, every contract signed, every book ballanced in it will be an ongoing, living, active memorial to those people of business and industry who were heartlessly killed. Their memorial will not be an empty and unproductive hole in the ground. No! Their memorial will be us continuing their work.

Oh, we will rebuild. That's the American thing to do. But we will not rebuild the old. No. We are Americans. We are always becoming, never being. We live for the future. So, in classic American style, we will rebuilt a new World Trade Center which will be bigger and better than any other now or in the past. We will not build the past's World Trade Center. We will build the future's World Trade Center.
 
Gollnick said:
You know what: while the events of 9/11 were an inexcusable crime and an act of war... the twin towers were ugly.

Besides, to rebuild the towers would be unamerican. Yes, it would. Albert Einstein said, "The American lives for the future. Life for him is always becoming, never being." To rebuilt the towers the way they were would be living in the past. It would be about getting back to being, not about becoming.

Others have suggested leaving the site empty. But that would be unamerican too. We are a nation of builders. We started on the east coast, we built our way across this vast continent all the way to the west coast, and now we're filling in. We are always becoming and always building. The people killed on 9/11 were builders. Some were, at the fatefull moment of impact, building business empires. Others were just trying to build a better life for themselves and their families. But they were all building. For us to leave that site empty would be a disgrace to their industry.

Their memorial will be a new World Trade Center, a bigger, better, more beautiful World Trade Center. And we will fill it with commerce and industry even more than the old one. And every deal that is negotiated, every order placed, every contract signed, every book ballanced in it will be an ongoing, living, active memorial to those people of business and industry who were heartlessly killed. Their memorial will not be an empty and unproductive hole in the ground. No! Their memorial will be us continuing their work.

Oh, we will rebuild. That's the American thing to do. But we will not rebuild the old. No. We are Americans. We are always becoming, never being. We live for the future. So, in classic American style, we will rebuilt a new World Trade Center which will be bigger and better than any other now or in the past. We will not build the past's World Trade Center. We will build the future's World Trade Center.

Never ever move backwards!
 
I think I'll always be moved by poignant articles about what happened on that god-awful day, but I'm for moving forward. I don't go for the "hallowed ground" concept and I don't believe the survivors of those who died there have any claim of ownership on that land or its use.

The state motto of New York is Excelsior, which means "Higher" and I think the best solution is to be true to the New York spirit.

I love New York!
 
fulloflead said:
This is the best commentary I've read in a long time. I couldn't NOT share this:

fulloflead,

Great commentary. I agree with it. I wish they would rebuild it just like it was.....but stronger :)

Cheers,
David
 
Everyday since I was 7 years old I had seen the NYC skyline with the World Trade Towers standing tall. On 9-11 they caming crashing down due to the terrible, cowardly act of terrorism. For there to be any real closure for the families of the victims they need to rebuild those towers as they stood on the morning of 9-11-2001. Rebuild them as a testament that we are the USA and that no scumbag terrorist can keep us down. Rebuild them as a fitting memorial to those lost and those who survived. Rebuild them as a direct slap in the face of those who wish to do us harm. Rebuild them to make America proud again.
 
Gollnick said:
You know what: while the events of 9/11 were an inexcusable crime and an act of war... the twin towers were ugly.

Yes they were. And from a purely aesthetic standpoint, the NYC skyline looked a lot better on 9/12/01 than it had in a long time. They were ugly boxes that took away from the beauty of the Empire State building and the Crysler building. If they want to rebuild something big in that spot, they need something on the scale of the Empire State building.

Anything bigger than those towers is just asking to get hit by a plane, and not a terrorist plane. The Empire State building was hit by a plane lost in the fog in the 40s... it's going to happen if we keep building taller buildings.
 
Psychopomp said:
Yes they were. And from a purely aesthetic standpoint, the NYC skyline looked a lot better on 9/12/01 than it had in a long time. They were ugly boxes that took away from the beauty of the Empire State building and the Crysler building. If they want to rebuild something big in that spot, they need something on the scale of the Empire State building.

You're kidding, right? How old are you? Did you see the skyline BEFORE the towers went up? After 9/11, what did you do, look at the skyline and say, "There, THAT'S better!" :confused:

I seriously try my mightiest to see things from others' point of view, but I simply can't wrap my head around that one.


Psychopomp said:
Anything bigger than those towers is just asking to get hit by a plane, and not a terrorist plane. The Empire State building was hit by a plane lost in the fog in the 40s... it's going to happen if we keep building taller buildings.

Yeah, because you know pilots just aren't paying attention when they fly over New York. :rolleyes:

Sorry, for the sarcasm but, frankly, you deserve it and I couldn't help it. ;)
 
It's obviously not up to me nor will it ever be,..... but as a foreigner that grew up nearby in North Jersey(Morris County), I've said since 9/11 that they should be rebuilt exactly the way they were.

There would be no bigger act of defiance, and resilience and generally just a big old fashion American F YOU to the terrorists, their supporters and in general to everyone that hates America. You can't destroy America regardless what you do. Sure things looked devastating on 9/11, and nearly 3000 people ARE dead, will remain dead and will NEVER be forgotten, BUT America bounces back from anything you terrorist punks throw at it.

Sure, add modern safety features and design features that will stop the towers from coming down the same way, but on the outside they should be built to look exactly as they did before.

Like I said, it's not up to me, but if I had a vote or a say in it, that would be it.

That's my honest 2 kiwi dollars worth.
 
fulloflead said:
You're kidding, right? How old are you? Did you see the skyline BEFORE the towers went up? After 9/11, what did you do, look at the skyline and say, "There, THAT'S better!" :confused:

I seriously try my mightiest to see things from others' point of view, but I simply can't wrap my head around that one.

uh... no. That's not exactly what I meant. I said from a PURELY AESTHETIC point of view. And no, the day after I didn't say "hey at least it looks better now." No, of course not.

The fact that I think those buildings were ugly doesn't deminish or make meaningless what happened that day. I said long before 9/11/01 that they were ugly.
 
The NYC skyline of 1960 was far more interesting .There were buildings of many different sizes shapes and styles.The building boom of the 60s brought something new - ugly stainless steel and glass shoe boxes. On a practical basis the WTC supplied a very large amount of office space and that must be replaced .Unfortunately because of political bickering it's going to be a long wait since they still haven't decided on the design .
 
Psychopomp said:
Yes they were. And from a purely aesthetic standpoint, the NYC skyline looked a lot better on 9/12/01 than it had in a long time. They were ugly boxes that took away from the beauty of the Empire State building and the Crysler building. If they want to rebuild something big in that spot, they need something on the scale of the Empire State building.

Anything bigger than those towers is just asking to get hit by a plane, and not a terrorist plane. The Empire State building was hit by a plane lost in the fog in the 40s... it's going to happen if we keep building taller buildings.

??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
 
Personally, I think the WTC made lower Manhattan look like the refrigerator aisle at Lowe's. I don't believe it was ever really economically successful either. Hopefully, it can be redone better.

I'll never forget my weekly flights in the early '90's from Newark to New Haven in the ATR-42's when we were lucky enough to take off heading south before coming around to the north and fly with the WTC seemingly right off the wingtip (about 2/3 the altitude of the top of the towers.)
 
Screw the towers... as a New Yorker and A resident of Lower Manhattan, it's an invitation to disaster. Do something useful with the money like fund roving death squads to eliminate terrorists and their sympathizers. It's funny how money from 2,752 tragedies is going to make some political insiders wealthy.
 
Back
Top