Recon Tanto as a wilderness knife?

Joined
Dec 7, 2019
Messages
3,548
Tactical uses aside (there isn’t a CS knife that won’t satisfactorily rip out a bad guy’s liver, let’s not kid ourselves), how does the Recon Tanto fare as a general purpose survival or wilderness knife? Carving, making feathering sticks, cutting rope, chopping thin branches, that sort of thing. Let’s leave batoning out too since I delegate firewood processing duties to axes.

Looking to score an SK5 Recon Tanto soon, hehe.
 
I don't think it is the best option but it should do it. For the price of the SK5 version, I would get it and give it a go, or if you already have one, give it a try. I'm normally a fan of "bring what you got" so if you don't have a better option, or just like it, bring it. I'm sure it will have its quirks and limitations but if you spend time with it, like most knives, you'll be able to get a lot of functionality from it.

Most of the tasks you listed use the flat part of the blade so you should be fine if that's all you want it for. Carving will be rough, but I think that is that case of all big knives if you need to do finer carving. I highly recommend a small carving knife to accompany it; they usually weigh only a couple ounces and make your like a lot easier. I haven't committed to a hook knife but it seems pretty common for those that like to make bowls and spoons on tromps. I don't know that I could adequately maintain one in the field yet so I prefer the standard carving knives, especially the sloyd knives.

I think the lack of a belly would be the biggest negative for me and my uses and I'm not sure tanto tips work well for food prep or cleaning fish or animals. However, you may be able to do all of that with the carving knife if you bring one of those. Kind of like the idea with kuhkris and bringing the karda for the finer work in an overall very versatile package.

As the above posted mentioned, for those specific purposes, most of us will prefer something else more like the SRK or recon scout. But, the tanto should be able to handle most tasks just fine, until the tip comes into play. The hollow grind may worry some but cold steel's hollow grinds are pretty shallow so it should hold up just fine.

If you try it, I for one wouldn't mind hearing how it goes as I've had similar considerations on trying that style of knife out to get my own impressions with real world experience. I just don't care for the look personally and haven't really liked the smaller tantos I've tried. Pretty much just want to itch the curiosity.
 
The advice you've gotten is pretty spot on. For wood processing, it should be no problem. There are YouTube videos on this, with the recon tanto and the kobun. The lack of belly might be an issue, but it is an easy mod to add one if you feel like it is needed.
 
Warning............ I have included pictures of processed animals. All I have to learn from is my own experience and that passed to me, or inferred, from other folks. I have a video somewhere that my wife did of me filleting a small Walleye, with an aus8 Recon Tanto. And it did a darn good job even with the factory edge. I'm a run what ya brung kind of person. Sometimes I just have a folder on me and take the guts out until home to better process...........But my research and relics finds from fur trade sites lead me to believe that three primary iron tools where almost always carried by fur traders around here. A folder for finer tasks like skinning etc., a medium/large fixed blade slicer for meat butchery, and a belt axe/hatchet/hawk, whatever you want to call it for heavier work, including smashing bones for marrow. The pictures I am including where finds from a 1780's fur trade general area. There where rings and all the usual trade trinkets. The folder as you can see was a pretty decent sized slip joint, and the belt axe was a medium size, as far as axe heads go. The iron fixed blade was traded at this particular site, and the French had slightly longer/thinner fixed blades as commonly traded. I was on a mixed trade site so the origin is dubious. It is none of my business what others do with their knives, and some folks use uncommon sense with them. In my view even a decent medium grade steel (compared to what's out now) like aus8 would have been a light saber compared to the basic iron tools that traders and trappers used, to open up North America. And these people used them for a living, often in isolation, in a very hostile environment. I have found snapped off chunks of those old folder blades. As for battoning, put it this way, the thicker the materials, the more my concern goes up about brutalizing a knife. And a hawk/hatchet is my preferred option. Hell, I can see the C.S. shovel as a good fire making tool in many ways, if it's the best option at hand. To each their own.
ojZrG0k.jpg

puDvtkE.jpg

CmjnR13.jpg

1ggGIps.jpg

ThbZjDC.jpg

oOFrEfA.jpg
 
Warning............ I have included pictures of processed animals. All I have to learn from is my own experience and that passed to me, or inferred, from other folks. I have a video somewhere that my wife did of me filleting a small Walleye, with an aus8 Recon Tanto. And it did a darn good job even with the factory edge. I'm a run what ya brung kind of person. Sometimes I just have a folder on me and take the guts out until home to better process...........But my research and relics finds from fur trade sites lead me to believe that three primary iron tools where almost always carried by fur traders around here. A folder for finer tasks like skinning etc., a medium/large fixed blade slicer for meat butchery, and a belt axe/hatchet/hawk, whatever you want to call it for heavier work, including smashing bones for marrow. The pictures I am including where finds from a 1780's fur trade general area. There where rings and all the usual trade trinkets. The folder as you can see was a pretty decent sized slip joint, and the belt axe was a medium size, as far as axe heads go. The iron fixed blade was traded at this particular site, and the French had slightly longer/thinner fixed blades as commonly traded. I was on a mixed trade site so the origin is dubious. It is none of my business what others do with their knives, and some folks use uncommon sense with them. In my view even a decent medium grade steel (compared to what's out now) like aus8 would have been a light saber compared to the basic iron tools that traders and trappers used, to open up North America. And these people used them for a living, often in isolation, in a very hostile environment. I have found snapped off chunks of those old folder blades. As for battoning, put it this way, the thicker the materials, the more my concern goes up about brutalizing a knife. And a hawk/hatchet is my preferred option. Hell, I can see the C.S. shovel as a good fire making tool in many ways, if it's the best option at hand. To each their own.
ojZrG0k.jpg

puDvtkE.jpg

CmjnR13.jpg

1ggGIps.jpg

ThbZjDC.jpg

oOFrEfA.jpg

"Run what you brung" was the term I couldn't think of this morning.

Good post. Pretty cool that the recon tanto did well cleaning a walleye, I wouldn't have guessed as much seeing what is standard for a fillet knife. Especially in the blade thickness department.
 
Back
Top