We do not know the whole story behind what is going on with those 6 possibly defective Sifus. I say possibly defective because most manufacturers consider the spine whack test as abuse and if the locks were damaged because of this, and not just defective, then it is the fault of the customer not R.E.K.A.T. for what happened. We may all think that a knife should withstand this test, but that does not mean that it is accepted as normal use of a knife by the manufacturer.
It is easy for a manufacturer to tell if the locks were damaged by this or defective, but they must have them back to be able to investigate. JW has stated that he does not kow where to send the knives. I would think that retuning them to the company would be what is required and if they have not moved it should be pretty easy to figure out where that is. I find it hard to believe that Christina will not send him the address to ship the knives to. It seems that JW has contacted Bob Brothers and been informed that he was the only person that fixed Sifus and that he no longer works for R.E.K.A.T.. If this is the case R.E.K.A.T. are in a lot of trouble. It is very likely that someone else at the company can fix his knives. It also seems the JW wants a guaranty that the knives will be fixed under warranty. That is not a reasonable request, in my opinion, as R.E.K.A.T. have as of yet to determine if the knives were faulty or were abused. Too many customers think that it is them that has the right to determine what is abuse of a product and what is not. If it was left up to the customer, nothing that they do to a product would be their fault. "Hell, I was only using it to pry manhole cover open and for me that is everyday use". I know that that is an extreme example, but believe me, in the industry in which I work I have seen people abuse products in a similar manner and expect them fixed, or even more rediculously, replaced, for free.
I am in no way employed in the knife industry. It just seems to me that far to many people think that for the sake of customer relations that a company should fix everything for free. I saw this awhile back when a member of this forum, who eventually realized that he did abuse the knife by modifying it, complained about the customer service of CRK. It seemed that almost everyone that responded to that thread thought that Chris should fix the knife for free to keep this customer happy. If you do that, you set a precedent and then you have to do it for everyone. That is only fair, right? If a company does not provide an unlimited warranty then they must stick to their guns and charge for abuse. If you don't do this then sometime down the line you are going to either be out of business due to the added costs of service, or your knives are going to have to increase quite a bit in price to cover the extra costs. People that think that a knife company should provide both a low price and an unlimited warranty are viewing things in a very self-serving manner.
Now that I have said all this, it may well be that the knives in question are faulty, but only R.E.K.A.T. can make that diagnosis. If a customer does not trust that they will do that in an honest way then he should not purchase their knives.
If the knives were broken by the spine whack test then JW is going to have to pay to have them fixed. I am sure that this will mean that he will never purchase another knife from R.E.K.A.T., but at this point I doubt that he would anyhow. He should not however expect his knives to be fixed for free just because that is the way he thinks it should be handled.
Well, if any of you got this far, sorry for being so wordy. I know how hard it is to read a long post like this.