It takes at least two people to have an argument. Why single out one person?It's getting might frigging old and tiresome too. I am starting to think that the original hiatus was not nearly long enough.
Some folks like to argue, just to argue, and when that happens and becomes the clear intent that is when the value of that person's contributions and even presence dries up. The funniest part is that as a wise man once said, those who know the least, know it the loudest. It could not be more evident here. Just because you state your position and sound of your voice gets louder, doesn't make your words truer, volume and repetition does not share a causal relationship with truth. Most get it, a few special ones never will.
If people don't like what others post, they, and you, are free to ignore them. As long as they aren't violating Bladeforums rules.
I'm not sure who you are referring to in the post above, but if a member is violating the posted forum rules, then punish them accordingly. And if a member is not violating the posted forum rules, then they should be free to post whatever they want without being publicly criticized by the moderators for doing so. Or am I wrong about that?
Just my opinion, based on observations in this thread and a thread in the Knife Laws forum, but I get the distinct impression that you and Esav have a personal dislike of RX-79G, and that you publicly express that dislike in the form of criticism, even when he hasn't violated any rules. Personally, I find that disturbing when moderators behave in such a manner.
And whose decision is it to leave this thread open and allow the "tiresome" arguing to continue?