- Joined
- Nov 4, 2012
- Messages
- 191
Some questions for those of you with direct experience with both the JAB Potbelly and one or more of the large Beckers.
Here's the background info, I've always been a pocket folder/mid-sized belt knife/hatchet/saw kind of outdoorsman. The concept of a large knife over a hatchet is something I've never really considered until recently (i.e. I started reading this forum). I currently have a BK-5, BK-13, BK-14, and BK-16. I really like all of them, and am very happy with them.
The BK-5 is my most recent Becker acquisition and I really like it, its an incredible knife, though I don't know if I can bring myself to replace my hatchet with it. Maybe it's me, but its hard for me to abuse a knife the way I do a hatchet. I've batoned it through a couple pieces of firewood (quarter round seasoned Douglas Fir) to make kindling, and it of course handled it with no issues, maybe my hesitance is just a mental block on the division of labor between belt knife and hatchet, (funny I just realized I don't have any issues beating the heck out of my 14 or 16, of course the wood I baton with them is smaller). Anyway, out in the woods, I wouldn't be messing with wood anywhere near as big in diameter as the firewood at home.
The same day I got the BK-5, I got a JAB Potbelly, it had a few minor issues out of the box, but I'm really liking it as well, I honestly don't recall how long its been since I've gotten a tool that I've had this much fun with. I mean pulling this thing out of its sheath just makes me giggle. I did a little firewood batoning with it, but like I said... mental block. I've done a fair amount of chopping with it, it's basically replaced my pruner for all the yard work I can reach with it, I've used it for moderate limbing, I've done some whittling/carving with it, and used it in the kitchen for slicing and dicing (it doesn't come close to the BK-5 for this though).
So here's the deal, I'm looking for input from those of you with experience in the woods or on the trail with both the Potbelly and 1 or more of the following: BK-2, BK-4, BK-5, BK-7, BK-9, and BK-10. Other than the BK-5, I have never even held any of those Beckers, but like I said I'm really liking both the Potbelly and the BK-5. I've spent enough time with the Potbelly to use it as a basis for comparison. I'm thinking about giving up my hatchet and mid-sized (BK-16 or similar) belt knife in favor of a large belt knife (Potbelly or one of the listed Beckers) I'd still carry a saw and a pocket folder.
Here's the questions:
With that in mind which knife would you advise me to choose to cover hatchet and belt knife duties, would you choose the Potbelly over the Becker(s) you have experience with or vice versa?
And most importantly, why?
To add a little more complexity to the mix, what if instead of replacing both the hatchet and mid sized belt knife, I decided to keep the belt knife and just swap out the hatchet, would this change your answer?
Thanks,
Erik
Here's the background info, I've always been a pocket folder/mid-sized belt knife/hatchet/saw kind of outdoorsman. The concept of a large knife over a hatchet is something I've never really considered until recently (i.e. I started reading this forum). I currently have a BK-5, BK-13, BK-14, and BK-16. I really like all of them, and am very happy with them.
The BK-5 is my most recent Becker acquisition and I really like it, its an incredible knife, though I don't know if I can bring myself to replace my hatchet with it. Maybe it's me, but its hard for me to abuse a knife the way I do a hatchet. I've batoned it through a couple pieces of firewood (quarter round seasoned Douglas Fir) to make kindling, and it of course handled it with no issues, maybe my hesitance is just a mental block on the division of labor between belt knife and hatchet, (funny I just realized I don't have any issues beating the heck out of my 14 or 16, of course the wood I baton with them is smaller). Anyway, out in the woods, I wouldn't be messing with wood anywhere near as big in diameter as the firewood at home.
The same day I got the BK-5, I got a JAB Potbelly, it had a few minor issues out of the box, but I'm really liking it as well, I honestly don't recall how long its been since I've gotten a tool that I've had this much fun with. I mean pulling this thing out of its sheath just makes me giggle. I did a little firewood batoning with it, but like I said... mental block. I've done a fair amount of chopping with it, it's basically replaced my pruner for all the yard work I can reach with it, I've used it for moderate limbing, I've done some whittling/carving with it, and used it in the kitchen for slicing and dicing (it doesn't come close to the BK-5 for this though).
So here's the deal, I'm looking for input from those of you with experience in the woods or on the trail with both the Potbelly and 1 or more of the following: BK-2, BK-4, BK-5, BK-7, BK-9, and BK-10. Other than the BK-5, I have never even held any of those Beckers, but like I said I'm really liking both the Potbelly and the BK-5. I've spent enough time with the Potbelly to use it as a basis for comparison. I'm thinking about giving up my hatchet and mid-sized (BK-16 or similar) belt knife in favor of a large belt knife (Potbelly or one of the listed Beckers) I'd still carry a saw and a pocket folder.
Here's the questions:
With that in mind which knife would you advise me to choose to cover hatchet and belt knife duties, would you choose the Potbelly over the Becker(s) you have experience with or vice versa?
And most importantly, why?
To add a little more complexity to the mix, what if instead of replacing both the hatchet and mid sized belt knife, I decided to keep the belt knife and just swap out the hatchet, would this change your answer?
Thanks,
Erik