- Joined
- Nov 12, 2011
- Messages
- 658
I had a look around and couldn't find a similar thread, though feel free to merge or delete if I have overlooked.
One advantage of traditional knives is the typical multiblade combination - different blade shapes, which also opens up hte possibility of different edge reprofiles on one knife.
I have a new #81 GEC Stockman, and I thought, since I have three very large and very different blades on one knife, I might try a combination of different profiles for each blade. The main will be a standard 30° reprofile, which will be the most often used EDC blade. I think I will try and get the sheepsfoot to just 20°, to make it a razor. What practical use is for me? I don't know
but it might somehow be useful. On the spey blade I might try my first ever convex reprofile - that way I have a blade that will be easy to resharpen anywhere. I guess there is no real practical need for all these specialized blades, but looking at the amount of blade real estate on this big stockman knife, it is an irresistable temptation for a knifeknut to tinker with.
what reprofiling combinations do others experiment with? have there been any historical reprofile combinations that have been popular?
One advantage of traditional knives is the typical multiblade combination - different blade shapes, which also opens up hte possibility of different edge reprofiles on one knife.
I have a new #81 GEC Stockman, and I thought, since I have three very large and very different blades on one knife, I might try a combination of different profiles for each blade. The main will be a standard 30° reprofile, which will be the most often used EDC blade. I think I will try and get the sheepsfoot to just 20°, to make it a razor. What practical use is for me? I don't know
what reprofiling combinations do others experiment with? have there been any historical reprofile combinations that have been popular?

