Researchin Imperial Schrades?

Codger_64

Moderator
Joined
Oct 8, 2004
Messages
62,324
Researching

Researching Schrade knife patterns is a enjoyable, but difficult task. Maybe that is why so few attempt it. Resources are difficult to find in the first place, but even when an accumulation of factory printed materials is found, separating the facts from errors is a daunting task. Statements by knowledgeable former factory employees, though few and far between, go a long way in sorting fact from fiction, but even they contain glaring errors.

While catalog listings can help date changes, such as first introductions of a pattern, some patterns were made and sold long before they were listed in the catalogs. Likewise, some patterns listed ran into manufacturing difficulties (material supply, process changes, design changes, etc.), and were introduced late, or even not at all. One must also be careful taking the catalog illustration details as verbatim. Many illustrations were reused year after year with no notice of minor changes (minor to the manufacturer at the time, though thought of as milestones for dating by collectors today).

Now, this is not to say that the catalogs and advertisements are not a very valuable resource, because they definitely are. Without them, the research field would be relegated to collecting anecdotal information, and hoping to chance across provenance history examples. These pattern examples, when available, do show a provable historical timeline for some vague details, and sometimes for the actual introduction of a pattern. The older a pattern is, the harder it is to find such examples that have not been tampered with, put in wrong boxes, paperwork missing or mismatched.

Packaging itself offers many clues as well, at least for general time periods. However, packaging use often overlapped, or was shortlived. I don’t have to mention how often the packaging was tossed, often the first thing to hit the trash, with paperwork eventually following, sheaths (particularly from the sixties back) had a finite life as well. Most of the earlier surviving packaging is fancier gift or “presentation” boxes. Often, dealers themselves removed the knives from their boxes for retail sale, and many earlier pattern knives were sold in bulk to the dealers There was never any packaging to save for these.

Warranty sheets and instruction sheets often have a copyright date or illustrate other available models, giving important clues to a particular knife’s production date.

The knives themselves provide clues to chronology, beyond the well recognized factory name changes reflected in the tangstamps. Minor changes in text styles, shields, guards, pommels/butt caps and blade and handle materials can sometimes help, particularly when supported by either dated paperwork, or factory printed materials. Serial numbers, during the all too brief time period of the 1960's through mid seventies (later for some patterns) help immensly, thoug it is very time consuming to survey and document them.

Included accessory items like lanyards (thongs), sheaths, stones, care kits (oil, cloths, etc.) and even bonus items provide hints, though these items were seldom used before the late seventies / early eighties. Sheaths can be very important, but also deceiving. Schrade was good about keeping replacement sheaths on hand, and owners are renowned for replacing damaged or lost sheaths with an odd sheath that “sort-of fits” from any number of makers. Even collectors dispersing their stock are renowned for mix-and-match. Catalog illustrations and provenance original box sets help, but as stated before, even the catalogs were wrong at times. Schrade themselves did not adhere to strict observance of sheath chronology. Several times, I have run across sheaths for a pattern that seem out of place, as if they bought from an outside source to help meet demand, or to fill in the gap while waiting for inhouse sheath makers to come online with a sufficient supply of a new design. Often, small tweeks can be found among sheaths of one pattern. These are most difficult to pin down as to chronology, unless they can be directly associated to a knife known to have only been issued in one particular year, like a Scrimshaw or other limited edition.

Actual patents are a prime example of datable materials for some patterns. Usually they are design patents (the ornamental appearance of an item), not utility patents ( the indepth description of construction methods, and features which contribute to an improvement of usefulness). Seldom would a pattern be produced and sold before the patent was filed, and likewise, seldom produced with patent pending marks after the patent issued. One untapped area is that of copyright filings and issuance. This would be a treasure trove in identifying timelines for shields, blade etches, and logos. And even pattern names.

Magazine advertisements also offer good clues, when they can be found. I have not pursued the buying of classic and antique outdoor magazines and catalogs, but have saved and transcribed a few old articles, and bought some odd cutout ads from magazines, mostly from the mid sixties to late seventies.

Factory production records, which I am certain still exist in private hands, and the memories of retired and former workers and management would be a gold mine, in my opinion. Someday perhaps someone with access and whatever credentials deemed suitable, will begin to access this wealth of information for the benefit of all Schrade knife collectors.

Any materials you guys can throw my way would be appreciated. And further the cause of Schradeophilia!

Codger
 
As most of you realize (and I rambled on about a few days ago in the above unresponded-to post), I am engaged in an ongoing effort to document production dates for the variants of many earlier Schrade and Schrade Walden patterns. As you also know, I share my information freely with the readers of this forum without asking anything in return, but some comradery (and an occasional hat or ball).

Can any of you send me scans or good photos of the box inserts with associated box, knife, and sheath types? I am most interested right now in determining exactly when the change was made from the slip-top woodgrained box to the fold-down woodgrain box, to the tan box. Any help you can give me will be greatly appreciated. There is no way I can afford to buy all the items I see for research materials.

ISC RIP, can you help? E-mail me please?!

Codger
 
Sorry I cannot be of much help to you on this subject, the oldest box I have is dated 1991 , it is black w/ blue stripe.
 
A couple of things...

  1. I just responded to your topic.
  2. I'll look through my stuff and see what I can find that will help you in your quest. I have relatively few knives with the original box or literature.
  3. Some of the paperwork that I have read is undated.

Just a tidbit to share with you because it doesn't warrant a new topic, I recently bought the new Blade's Guide To Knives & Their Values. There are several chapters devoted to the history of American cutlery firms, and in the chronology for Camillus, is the following entry:
1990. Camillus buys stake in Smoky Mountain Knife Works, Sevierville, Tennessee, where part of its factory collection is now on display.
If I'm not mistaken, Camillus is owned by the daughters of Albert Baer. How ironic.
 
Even a scan of the various generations of box inserts would help. Chronology, if not exact dates, can be established by the other knives illustrated on them. For instance, one insert shows the following:
108OT
94OT
33OT
77OT
194OT
154OT
125OT
25OT
61OT
34OT
165OT
15OT
We can rightly surmise this insert accompanied a knife made after 1975 and before 1989, because six of those patterns appeared in 1976, and the 154OT was dropped after '88. Also, no patterns appear that were introduced after 1976 (31 more between 1977-88), so it is likely the knife was made within a year or two of that date.


Any scans or copies of any of the inserts will be helpful!

Codger
 
Mike,
I don't know that I have anything that will help, but I will look through my NIBs and see what I have.

Dale
 
Every little bit helps. Here is an example of one illustration extracted from a Walden insert. Great detail, and pretty good info.


Even with this information, as good as it is, you can see an error. Or Sheathmaker can!
Codger
 
The snap and strap are in the wrong place.Isn't it supposed to be like the early 152's.Toby
 


I've never seen the handle retainer strap on the waffle tooled sheath either. Those didn't happen until circa 1970. By then, the tooling was deleted and eyelets added to protect the laces, then in '71 they did away with the laces and used stitches and rivets.

Now, this said, exceptions were the rule with Schrade. There could have been a limited number of sheaths like the one in this circa '67-'68 illustration made, but evidently not for regular production. It might be an oddity to watch for in the future.

Codger
 
Sorry been playing cards ( lost but that is why it is called gambling ). I have some imperial stuff that would be hard to explain original dies, tang stamps, original grinding stone used by Felix Miranda in the 20 tys, original work tables with drawers wooden with IKCO metal tags to much to mention plus written material I will not get to for a year. In any event here are a few displays which I have sitting around which since I just walked in I snapped off in about 2 minutes. I believe IMPERIALs will become very collectable it has already started to happen. I always liked them as a Kid I could afford them and even though mostly shell knives are very pretty and colorful knives, they attract kind of like a daredevil spoon to a large pickeral. Apparently after this week end I am after all a real fish. I hope these pics give your thread a boost. LT PS Codger I mailed your package with a few extras.
 
Thanks for the post and pics, LT. Sorry about the cards, but my guess is that you fed (baited) the fish for the next time. I think most of us had at least one Imperial character knife as a kid. Those brought back some memories! They were cheap, but a real knife compared to the five and dime tin knives from japan with stamped handles AND blades. I'll dive off into the Imperials one day before too long (beyond the six or so I have now). Probably about the time you finally dive into all those papers!

Toby, that looks like a match between the Walden 15OT and the sheath. The insert protector is missing it's aluminum rim. I'll see if I have a spare. The fiber insert looks to be OK, and it is possible that the aluminum rim is hiding in the bottom of the sheath. One with full laces like that is hard to find. Congratulations!

Codger
 
Thanks ,I owe it to someone on this forum.At some point someone,probably you, posted a picture of the sheath and the knife.Thats what makes this a great place to visit.Toby
 
The nice thing about displays is that the prices ( if you have them on the insert )show a natural age progression from oldest least expensive on up. I have a display I am working on now which predates these. The three plastic with Jackmaster labels on top were the last (table) display they used 79 or 80 obviously cheaper than the older wood ones they are called the JM ( I believe ) series 1-4 number 2 is missing . You can see the one wooden where any knife is 1.29. The one I am working on was 98 cents and they were Jackmaster Hammer imperials. Notice also the progression from flat cardboard attached knives to plastic inserts where the knife fits in the insert on the plastic formed board. This history of displays is fairly ( with some modfications ) consistent with the way most companies did displays.
 
Codger,
I think one reason that you can't trust the ino on the paper inserts is that the company probably had them printed in very large,economical quantities.If a design changed or more models were introduced,it's likely they didn't want to go to the expense of getting new ones printed.At some point,the stock-in-hand would become so outdated that they would be forced in getting a new batch printed.
Just my 2cents!
Ron
 
I would like to point out what I feel is an advantage for using displays as a ( vintage ) guide. Quite honesty in the situation of Imperials ( regarding shells ), there amount of patterns did not vary as much as say Schrade. Old catalogues list many of the same patterns that continued even through the period of Irish Imperials, at the end. You can in the pictures see 30 or 40 years of knives and in most cases the patterns are the same ( DOZEN OR SO) with minor, shields ect variations. Several of these displays have prices over prices ( tags) to align with price changes. However the case ( display) design has to ( I believe you will agree ) show the general time frame, since in this situation the patterns remain fairly constant. Since part of this thread is the dating of the packaging material, in this case I feel this affords a viable alternative to this end. The Frontiers do not ( unfortunately ) have the correct inserts however in there case the few tang markings and limited time frame of production do not make this as important as that of the Jackmaster and Diamond edge ( SHELL ) lines. Taking the JM series ( as example ) note the knives are aligned differently but basicly ( not exactly with minor pattern inclusion ect ) the same. While it cannot be seen in the pictures the prices in the little replacable stick on tags show which is the earlier JM 1 versus the JM 3 or 4 however it is correct that a store owner with a JM 1 display needed only to replace the tags to advance the price. Again because essentially they were the same knives only the displays age, can be determined. I have the brochures which denote the years of release of each of these. Because of this I feel the JM displays by themselves, denote a total time frame in spite of prices . Because of these facts I feel displays can be more reliable than the paper inserts for identification. LT
 
relodr36 said:
Codger,
I think one reason that you can't trust the info on the paper inserts is that the company probably had them printed in very large,economical quantities.If a design changed or more models were introduced,it's likely they didn't want to go to the expense of getting new ones printed.At some point,the stock-in-hand would become so outdated that they would be forced in getting a new batch printed.
Just my 2cents!
Ron
No doubt they used up whatever stock they had on hand before ordering a new batch of inserts. Until I get a much larger sampling, we will have no way of knowing just how often they were updated. But given the volume of knives produced, each using an insert, I would guess they reordered from their printers way more than once a year. Fixed blade knives always were low volume sellers compared to the slipjoints. And I am pretty sure they shared inserts. So for every thousand inserts sent out with a 15OT or 165OT, a hundred thousand (or a million) or more went out with the pocket knives. Without the actual production records, we may never know exact numbers.

Now, understand that we are talking here particularly of Old Timers, and a relatively brief timespan when the inserts were an important adjunct to the boxed knives. From the early 1960's through the early 1980's, or whenever the boxes (sliptop, folddown, tan) and inserts changed.

While they did identify the manufacturer and give warranty information, and also knife care information, I feel their chief function was to advertise other available knives to a targeted buyer, one who had just bought a new knife. It was an easy and inexpensive way to advertise, and much more economical to update than the thousands of multi-page catalogs sent out each year. And gave them a way to announce midyear offerings without waiting for new catalogs to be issued (exceptions being when they took advantage of announcing company name changes as in '73 and '92 when two catalogs were produced). But even if they only updated the inserts every two or three years, they still are valuable to a researcher in establishing a timeframe for production changes, even if the info is not exact, or has errors in the artwork. As you can see, the information about each featured model is much more complete than in a brief catalog listing.

Other than direct access to factory records, displays are the collector's Cadillac on dating changes, IMHO. I am thankful that some collectors are preserving them. Hopefully someday all the information to be garnered from them will be compiled, and a fairly complete photo history done. This will, as you pointed out LT, be doubly important for researching the Imperial lines. They were relegated to the back burner on advertising and promotion, and eventually shunted off because of competition with the Schrade lines (real or percieved), so information on them is sorely lacking.

Codger
 
Back
Top