- Joined
- Nov 20, 2001
- Messages
- 7,353
All,
I sometimes see mention in knife retailer that "...this maker is retired and therefore this piece cannot be replicated blablabla...". I've always found this was a silly spiel. To me, a retired maker is a maker who is going to fade from collectors' minds. Same thing applies to makers who are deceased. Of course, there are a few exceptions (Jim Schmidt, Bill Moran, etc), but the vast majority of makers don't live much of an imprint once they move on, apart maybe for hard core enthusiasts.
I'm curious what you guys think...
Thanks,
Joss
I sometimes see mention in knife retailer that "...this maker is retired and therefore this piece cannot be replicated blablabla...". I've always found this was a silly spiel. To me, a retired maker is a maker who is going to fade from collectors' minds. Same thing applies to makers who are deceased. Of course, there are a few exceptions (Jim Schmidt, Bill Moran, etc), but the vast majority of makers don't live much of an imprint once they move on, apart maybe for hard core enthusiasts.
I'm curious what you guys think...
Thanks,
Joss