Review: A. G. Russell Brute

Joined
Nov 1, 2004
Messages
3,352
This review is for A. G. russell's new Brute, which is model number AG-BRUT in their catalog. The knife sells for $195. The knife I'm reviewing is a First Production knife that I got from a friend, so some small details might be a bit off (blade markings, etc.) The knife is made in the U.S.A.

Handle Specifications and Impressions: The handle is made of a dark orange Rucarta (another term for Micarta). It's 4" long, and has a lanyard hole drilled into the butt. There is a nickel silver liner in the lanyard hole. The pins are stainless steel. The lockback is .13" in thickness, and is made of the same ATS-34 as the blade. The handle looks really nice, and fits the hand very well. The lockback design hasn't changed much throughout the years, but it's still very smooth to open and close. Everything A. G. says on the website. After working with the Brute for a bit, my hand doesn't get as tired as it does with my smaller Buck Ranger. It definitely feels good.

Blade Specifications and Impressions: The Brute's blade is made of ATS-34 stainless steel, and is Rockwell rated at 60-61. It's a 3" long drop point blade, no serrations, and is .13" thick. It appears to be hollow ground. There is a slight nail catch on the left side of the blade, which really isn't necessary because this knife opens very smoothly without it. The blade came very sharp, almost hair-shaving sharp. It cut everything I could think to use for a knife of this purpose, including cardboard, zip ties, plastic tubing, paper, and packaging materials. After almost 60 cuts through cardboard, it started to dull. Very easy to resharpen. The lock is solid, and it really is nice to have a knife that behaves like a smaller Buck 110 with better steel.

In a word, the price is what hurts this knife. It's nice, but it's not worth the $195 to me. I wouldn't spend any more than maybe $75 on this knife. I mean, for almost $200 you can get something with a much better blade material and better handle materials. You can also get a pocket clip or belt holster. Don't get me wrong; this is a great knife, just not $195 great. If the price were lowered to around $75 or so, I could see a lot more people buying them.

You can check out the Brute here... http://www.agrussell.com/knives/by_...ives/folding_knives/a_g_russell_brute__1.html
 
Jnieporte---Thanks for the R&T. Only one thing holds me back from getting one and you said it>the price. Maybe AG should run a special on that folder. That would be a good business move, I think. Good looking knife. Thanks!
 
Jnieporte---Thanks for the R&T. Only one thing holds me back from getting one and you said it>the price. Maybe AG should run a special on that folder. That would be a good business move, I think. Good looking knife. Thanks!

Hey, If you want made in China I could make and sell it for $50-60 in D2 or AUS-10

I would rather make them by hand in the US and sell 2 or 3 dozen a year. My market is not the same as Lowes or Wal-Mart.
 
AG---Thanks for your integrity. Now, after you explained things, I just might order a Brute. And my name is not Hey. lol! Thanks!
 
Keep it just like it is--there is no such thing as a universally "better" blade material, every steel makes sacrifices in some attribute to make gains in another. ATS-34 is a great all-around performer for a pocketknife, especially at this hardness, and the fit/finish on this model has impressed me more than many custom folders.
Hell, I have the cheaper Japanese-made version of it too, and its fit and finish are superb. Nice to see traditional lockbacks made with this level of quality.

A.G.--I'd love to see a larger version, like 3.75" to replace my Buck 110 when hunting. If I needed to buy a couple/few to get the ball rolling that'd be fine by me... ;)
 
Hey, If you want made in China I could make and sell it for $50-60 in D2 or AUS-10

I would rather make them by hand in the US and sell 2 or 3 dozen a year. My market is not the same as Lowes or Wal-Mart.

Mr Russell, I for one rather like that knife. Under $200 for a quality hand made in the USA folder sounds like a good deal to me. It looks like a Gentlemans folder but with a blade that thick it could also handle some serious work. :thumbup:

JNieporte, thanks for starting this Thread and posting your impressions.

Heber
 
The Brute's blade is made of ATS-34 stainless steel, and is Rockwell rated at 60-61. It's a 3" long drop point blade, no serrations, and is .13" thick.

Just for clarification, the website says the blade is 3/16 of an inch thick, (closer to .187 than the .13 that you describe) is the site no longer accurate?

Also, these have come up under the 'factory seconds' area on AG's website at a substantial, and I daresay very tempting, discount. Perhaps in time more will show up there, if the MSRP is higher than one's pocketbook may afford them.
 
I liked the looks of the knife in the catalog, and I've handled the Brute at AGR's store. The example I saw had some fit and finish imperfections on the inside of the scales and the grind was OK but unevenn and not expected for $200. For a display model, I was disappointed and did not buy one.

For comparison, I have a Dick Atkinson lock back, all micarta handle, that's smaller in width and thickness but longer in blade. It is highly polished micarta with abolone inlays on the scales and was $150. The entire spine of the lock back and 75% of the blade is file worked. The fit and finish on the Atkinson is much better, it's better looking, particularly with the file work and inlay, the grind is not perfect, but is better than the Brute. IMHO, the Brute is at least $50 too high even for hand made USA. Based upon the recent Chinese Spyderco, if it was made in China, it'd be $40 MSRP.
 
Just for clarification, the website says the blade is 3/16 of an inch thick, (closer to .187 than the .13 that you describe) is the site no longer accurate?

I'll have to remeasure, but I'm pretty sure it was .13" wide. I could be wrong, so I'll check again.

To A. G. Russell.... don't send production to China. I own a few of your knives, and I've been perfectly happy with all of them. I especially like your folding pruning knife. The only, and I mean ONLY complaint I have about the Brute is the price tag. Workmanship is superb, I just don't have the money for it right now.
 
I'll have to remeasure, but I'm pretty sure it was .13" wide. I could be wrong, so I'll check again.

I guess it's possible that they've changed production parameters and are currently using thinner stock. I don't think it'd be the first time a company has modified one of their knives, a bit.
 
Back
Top