Review : custom by Luke Freeouf

Cliff Stamp

BANNED
Joined
Oct 5, 1998
Messages
17,562
This is a custom made knife by Luke Freeouf who posts on Bladeforums as Lurkers. It is a heavy duty seven inch blade made from A2 with a Paul Bos heat treat. This mass is 525 g, which is quite high for its ~7" blade length, however the center of mass is only about one cm in front of handle, so it is close to neutral in balance. It thus feels very solid in hand, but does not induce a lot of wrist strain. It is an interesting combination of weight and balance. It has a full height flat grind on ~5/16" stock, and the grind transition from primary to full stock in the choil area is simply excellent, very smooth and flowing.

The handle is contoured in both in width as well as in depth which makes for very comfortable grip and also enhances security. However, and the pins are not flush with the grip which could be abrasive to some depending on size of hand and grip, plus the holes are also places where water and debris can collect, so the make cleaning the handle more difficult. The grip length area however is a little short for me, this is person dependent factor of course, my hands are around five inches wide. I would also want a more aggressive surface texture on the wood, but this is always a tradeoff for security at the expence of comfort and something the user can alter to his taste with little work.

The edge is basically flat ground, more specific it measures 0.037" thick at the back of the edge which is ground to 18-19 degrees per side. The edge has seen some use and shows minor chipping at the level of 50 microns. This is far below the level that you can see by eye, you can just pick out some roughness with a thumbnail check. The Project from Chris Reeves also wore in the same way after chopping. It is still easily sharp enough for most work, but would want to be touched up for finer cutting. Here is a side shot of the blade :

http://www.physics.mun.ca/~sstamp/images/Lukes_knife_side.jpg

and one showing the handle shaping :

http://www.physics.mun.ca/~sstamp/images/luke_blade_bottom.jpg

Misc work outdoors :

The knife was carried for a few weeks of lot clearing. It saw a lot of limbing, as well as some bucking and even felling, the latter was on the smaller wood. It was also used for splitting to fuel the routine fires at lunchtime and in the evening as well as using the point to break the dry wood apart for tinder as well as using the edge as a scraper for shavings and then slicing slightly thicker bits for stoking after the flame had caught on. It was also used for simple food prep, on both freshly caught fish as well as the more normal bread, sausage and cheese and the like. In general it handled all those tasks well enough, though it was over built for such work as this kind of use isn't that demanding in general so a thinner blade will have higher performance. Overall I would also want a more blade balanced piece to allow more power when chopping, and a longer handle , specifically the end of the handle should be out past the handle to prevent any abrasion. Also the end talon should be fully matched with the handle slabs to minimize pressure on contacts.

Misc work indoors :

Using the blade in the kitchen, while it can slice vegetables and such, because of the thicker cross section it tends to break them apart. For example cutting through a turnip you get about halfway and then it break in half, thus fine cutting isn't possible. However it works easily well enough to just chunk things up for a stew, and with the edge sharp sails through meats and soft fruits and vegetables like tomatoes. It is of course heavier and thicker than what is necessary for such work, and really only excels at things like crushing nuts, or chopping through frozen foods. On just normal utility cutting much the same is seen, it is in general over built for this type of word and thus in general you are using more force than needed.

Heavy work :

This is where the knife excels. I carried the blade for quite awhile and whenever I had something heavy to do pulled it out. It is very rugged due to the cross section and steel type, and thus you can lean on it very hard without fear of significant damage. For example even the heaviest digging/prying I could do in wood would not even flex the blade let alone come close to bending or breaking it. It is also heavy enough to use the spine as a makeshift hammer. Thus it is ideal for such work and is definately in the sharpened pry bar class, built as a utility tool and thus has a very broad range of work. I would feel comfortable carrying this knife in being able to handle just about anything that you needed to do.

Stock testing :

After getting a feel for the blade in just routine work I then did a number of stock tests to gauge it alongside other blades I had. In a chopping comparison to a Tramontina Bolo (which is in the same class as the Wildlife Hatchet from Gransfors Bruks), Luke's blade was at 49 +/- 3 % . This is not efficient from a mass point of view, but from a length perspective it is very much so. Using a hook grip around the end will increase penetration, but the control goes off which is counterproductive so overall I didn't notice a significant increase. More work with that type of grip would increase my precision, but it isn't very comfortable as the steep talon curvature doesn't lend itself this sort of grip and as well makes using a lanyard not overly functional for the same reason.

Before I did the rest of the stock testing I altered the bevel profile slightly. The main edge I left at a similar same angle, it was 0.039" x 0.070" which is ~16 degrees, however I put in a shoulder, 0.070" x 0.141" which is a reduced 12 degrees. It was then sharpened using waterstones and finished on a CrO loaded strop. On 3/8" hemp using a rocking cut it took 28-32 lbs near the tip which is quite good, but 60-62 lbs near the base. The much increased force required there is due to the lack of curvature. Since the edge is very flat, much of it hits the cutting surface and thus you need a lot more force to get the required pressure. However without the cutting board influence the cutting ability in general is a lot higher, for example whittling hardwood dowels it took only 16.3 +/- 0.7 slices to make a point. Compare this to the Twistmaster from Cold Steel which takes ~12 which is a widely regarder as very efficient cutter.

This wood cutting did reveal a problem with the choil area of Luke's knife however in that the smooth taper left the index finger cutout too thin. The pressure was so high that I very quickly had to wear a heavy work glove to continue the cutting. With the glove I would not have been able to work with a choked up grip and thus I would have to use a regular grip and thus face a significant torque disadvantage. However at the same time a fine feature was noticed. I was using a Camp Tramp from Swamp Rat at the same time and Luke's grip at the front is well rounded whereas on the Camp Tramp the grip is very square to the handle and thus is very uncomfortable in a choked up grip as the top corners of the grip are high pressure points. The grip should flow down from the top and down into the blade for maximum comfort in such a grip.

Doing some tip penetration tests is another area where the knife really shines. The blade penetrates 662 +/- 32 pages into a phone book, which is in the same class as the significantly heavier Battle Mistress from Busse Combat. The blade really came into its own when I used it for digging in 2" scrap (2x4 and 2x6" mainly). It took on average 18 +/- 2 stabs and prys to get enough of a hole to fit my index and middle finger, and this was 2.2 +/- 0.2 minutes. The best I have seen so far. Of course wood density has a fair bit of influence on this, so I need to do some more digging to give a more robust rank however just by the feel of its performance I could tell it was well suited to the task. It is very heavy which allows for a lot of power yet is not so long which increases precision and tip was so strong that I could very quickly and without fear put a lot of weight into breaking out the wood with a press down.

Where the knife comes up short however is in slicing 3/8" hemp rope. I set out to do some edge retention work by simply cutting the rope and measuring the sharpness, however the force required was so high it was simply quite difficult to do, and the high level of force tended to mask the sharpness changes. Getting specific, an average quality knife finished on a 600 grit DMT rod will see an increase in force of about 5-10 pounds (Cold Steel Twistmaster for example) after cutting 126 pieces of hemp on a two inch draw. Because the force required by Luke's knife was ~50 lbs on the start it was impossible to see an increase of this extent as it is simply masked by the variance in cutting. What I can say is that it was at least as good as the Cold Steel blade and likely better in regards to edge holding because it wasn't significant different in regards to force required to cut the hemp after the 126 cuts were made.

On a tangent of this issue, if you draw the blade back through the rope with the knife held at an angle, you will increase the aggression significantly. For example I could get it decreased to ~35 lbs on Luke's blade, however I have done all the cutting to date with the blades run flat, so to be consistent in comparison I had to do it this way with this blade. However for normal utility use this isn't a factor obviously. I will be thinning the edge shortly and will rerun the stock testing as well as some regular work to confirm there was no functional loss of durability.

-Cliff
 
Cliff,
That looks like a real nice knife. I especially like the handle design, I like the shaping. I find wood handles pleasing to work with.

I think the steel choice (A2) is a solid one, as is the Bos Heat treat and full flat grind.

The blade stock is too thick for my personal use, but for someone looking for a thick knife it looks good.

The design reminds me of something. Hmmmm, I can't think of what maker, but perhaps a mushroom cloud will appear and cast some nuclear light on the subject. . . Just kidding, I just figured after the crap Busse was purported to have given Eric Ferhmann it is funny to see another "talon hole" on a knife design. But IIRC Lukers is a big Busse fan, and I know you tested his Busse knives.

I think the blade profile is nice as well. I think the blade with a longer thinner blade (like 3/16" thick, 14" long) would make a nice bush knife.
 
Eric :

The design reminds me of something.

It is very similar to the old Busse Steel Heart even down to steel and stock thickness, same point profile, wide blade, general style as well as talons. I doubt that Luke would claim that Busse was not an influence. This was also a personal knife he made for himself so trademark issues and such don't apply.

I think the blade with a longer thinner blade (like 3/16" thick, 14" long) would make a nice bush knife.

Very much so, I would go with a simpler steel though, A6, A8 or A9 whichever offered the suitable stock. Once he branches out into his own heat treating the simple carbon steels are very well suited to this, around 0.5% carbon and a RC as close to 60 as possible making best use of the tradeoff of hardness for toughness and ductility. Some experimenting would be in order here to see where the optimal group of abilities lay.

-Cliff
 
It is very similar to the old Busse Steel Heart even down to steel and stock thickness, same point profile, wide blade, general style as well as talons

Just as the Steel Heart is similiar in design to many knives that came before it, and almost every drop point hunter has a Loveless influence. The old SH Busse's are among my favorite designs looks wise, as well as offing strong performance. I'd say Luke ahd a great base!!

This was also a personal knife he made for himself so trademark issues and such don't apply.

I agree. Intellectual Property and Patent law is tricky stuff. But my intuition is that Luke is on safe ground here.

The Jones Brothers and Mark Hazen are making some knives which look great right now too, very nice style.

I would go with a simpler steel though, A6, A8 or A9 whichever offered the suitable stock.

For the style of blade (bush blade) I'd go even simpler, 5160 spring steel. Very high toughness levels. For steel Junkies I think 3V may have potential, especially considering the work Hossom and Rinaldi (with Paul Bos) are doing with it. But I think simple is the way to go, and it don't get much simpler or less expensive, nor easier to heat treat than 5160. The A in the shock resistent series is the abrevation for Air-Kool. These are air quenching tool steels with high levels of moly, the heat treat requires much more expensive equipment and is a more complex process. Some of the work being done with watercool (internal) aluminum quenching plates to result in dieeferential hardening in these steels is interesting, but I have only seen this in industrial applications, not cutlery. These air hardeining tool steels offer more wear resistance, but this is not needed, and may be detrimental on a bush blade (sharpening concerns).

A while ago you had mentioned that you were having a large blade forged on a shock series steel (S-7 or S-5 like in jack hammer bits) has there been any progress?


How does the Luker knife compare to the GB hatchets in terms of chopping performance, as well as other wood work?

My personal experience is that a small axe is a far more effectve tool for most tasks than a large knife. I think the knives in the size range of 6-12" suffer the worst here. In order to get close to the power of a small axe you need a really big knife, like the 14" and above class (i.e.. Valiant Goloks). . . . Although the 7" knife may do a few things as well, or maybe a little better than a small axe (maybe some limbing or slicing tasks), on balance the small axe so far eclipses the large knife over a broad range of tasks that the choice is easy for me. It become even easier when you look at prices. a top notch axe like the GB line can be had for a fraction of the price of a large knife.
 
Nice review Cliff!

Eric,

Originally posted by Eric_Draven
I think the blade profile is nice as well. I think the blade with a longer thinner blade (like 3/16" thick, 14" long) would make a nice bush knife.

I would like to see more knives like that myself. A flat grind, medium blade thickness and a reasonably long blade should be ideal for most brush work. I would like a longer handle so you can vary your grip, and have enough room even when wearing heavy work gloves. The grip should be designed for security - preventing slipping out of the hand in either direction. A choil would be useful for better control on fine work.

For a blade steel even 1050 would do - it won't hold an edge as well as some of the others but it is tough, cheap and easy to sharpen and repair minor damage in the field. 5160, L6, A9 and CPM3V are progressively better in most respects, except for cost and difficulty in repairing edge damage in the field in most cases.
A9 (128 ft-lbs Charpy C-notch at Rc 56, which about the same as S7) is the stand out in terms of toughness and CPM3V for combined toughness and wear resistance (85 ft-lbs Charpy C-notch at Rc 58 and wear resistance better than D2).


-Frank
 
Eric :

A while ago you had mentioned that you were having a large blade forged on a shock series steel (S-7 or S-5 like in jack hammer bits) has there been any progress?

It is still in the design stage I am not quite sure where I want to go with it. I will be working with some other blades of that general type soon and should be able to iron out the design.

How does the Luker knife compare to the GB hatchets in terms of chopping performance, as well as other wood work?

As noted, the Wildlife Hatchet is in the same class as the Bolo, so the same ratio applies for chopping performance, the hatchet is a better splitter and hammer obviously. For limbing I would chose the hatchet simply for better penetration, but give the blade to the inexperienced as hitting the handle of the hatchet off of limbs is common and will break it readily. The blade does most cutting and such easier because of control, plus on thick vegetables and such the hatchet can not do much besides break them apart and is very difficult to do work like peeling and such. The exception to this would be skinning type work at which the nice smooth curve on the hatchet works very well. The blade has advantages as well for point work and things which require more length like filleting, snow block shaping etc. .

Frank :

A flat grind, medium blade thickness and a reasonably long blade should be ideal for most brush work.

There are some, but not a lot. The market seems to mainly be "tactical" now and simple working blade designs are not frequent. In addition, woody brush blades of that length require very high levels of durability. Because you are cutting down on the stock thickness, you can't overbuild and thus you have to be very confident in steel and heat treat. It weeds out problems very quickly in use. The method of use is also very demanding as speed increases with lengh as well as raw power because of weight, and precision goes down. It all adds up to blades of that length demanding *much* more than a simple 10" camp bowie. Cutting hard small diameter wood is among the very hardest of knife tasks, and is much more demanding than many of the "extreme" tests like concrete block chopping and such. There have been several designs tossed around on the Busse forums for longer blade so it will interesting to see what comes out of that. The Swamp Rat line seems to be an obvious candiate.

I would like a longer handle so you can vary your grip, and have enough room even when wearing heavy work gloves. The grip should be designed for security - preventing slipping out of the hand in either direction. A choil would be useful for better control on fine work.

This was something I had made awhile ago along those lines :

http://www.physics.mun.ca/~sstamp/images/parrell_parang_side.jpg

http://www.physics.mun.ca/~sstamp/images/parrell_parang_top.jpg

The edge is unsharpened for a bit in front of the grip to allow a choked up grip, but I never actually use that outside of testing as I am generally carrying a small knife. The grip has three main holds; one up near the front which is used for mainly wrist work, one around the main body which gets the full power work, and one around the end knob, usually with a laynard which gets maximum reach on soft targets. It is a fully convex profile, no secondary edge bevel, forged from 5160.

For a blade steel even 1050 would do

Yes, Jason Arnold is using 1045 which is what I was thinking of when I mentiond 0.5 carbon in the above. He is mainly into japanese work now, but it doesn't take much of a design change to turn a fully convex sword profile into a bush blade. Bos doesn't do those kinds of steels though, so until Luke starts doig his own heat treating, or goes somewhere else, he is limited to air cooling steels, of which I would stick to the high A series as noted in the above.

A9 (128 ft-lbs Charpy C-notch at Rc 56, which about the same as S7) is the stand out in terms of toughness

Yes, I would like to see just how much of an effect that the really high toughness has in regards to edge durability. It isn't going to be anywhere linear as a lot of the damage is due to impaction which is just related to RC, and yield failure which is a ductility issue, however the benefit should still be significant for inclusion contacts.

-Cliff
 
Originally posted by Cliff Stamp
There are some, but not a lot. The market seems to mainly be "tactical" now and simple working blade designs are not frequent.


It’s too bad that blades of that type are neglected; I could see a cheap one made of something like 1050 with injection molded handles becoming popular. A higher end version made of CPM3V with something like G10 scales would be nice too.


In addition, woody brush blades of that length require very high levels of durability. Because you are cutting down on the stock thickness, you can't overbuild and thus you have to be very confident in steel and heat treat. It weeds out problems very quickly in use. The method of use is also very demanding as speed increases with lengh as well as raw power because of weight, and precision goes down. It all adds up to blades of that length demanding *much* more than a simple 10" camp bowie. Cutting hard small diameter wood is among the very hardest of knife tasks, and is much more demanding than many of the "extreme" tests like concrete block chopping and such. There have been several designs tossed around on the Busse forums for longer blade so it will interesting to see what comes out of that. The Swamp Rat line seems to be an obvious candiate.



I hope that they use a tougher steels like those that have been mentioned instead of 52100 or what ever they use in the Swamp Rat line. I think 0170-6C at Rc 58-9 was not the best choice for the Becker Patrol machete, I would have much preferred, for instance L6 at Rc 56-8, in such a design.



This was something I had made awhile ago along those lines :

http://www.physics.mun.ca/~sstamp/images/parrell_parang_side.jpg

http://www.physics.mun.ca/~sstamp/images/parrell_parang_top.jpg

The edge is unsharpened for a bit in front of the grip to allow a choked up grip, but I never actually use that outside of testing as I am generally carrying a small knife. The grip has three main holds; one up near the front which is used for mainly wrist work, one around the main body which gets the full power work, and one around the end knob, usually with a laynard which gets maximum reach on soft targets. It is a fully convex profile, no secondary edge bevel, forged from 5160.



Looks nice. That is basically what I had in mind except that I think I would like a guard and a handle which was a little longer and straighter. The convex grind is nice for increased durability.



I would like to see just how much of an effect that the really high toughness has in regards to edge durability. It isn't going to be anywhere linear as a lot of the damage is due to impaction which is just related to RC, and yield failure which is a ductility issue, however the benefit should still be significant for inclusion contacts.


I would guess that CPM3V would make the better overall choice due to its combination of very high wear resistance and reasonably high toughness (which is disproportionately high in the transverse direction when compared to non CPM steels).



-Frank
 
Cliff:
As noted, the Wildlife Hatchet is in the same class as the Bolo, so the same ratio applies for chopping performance,

I am suprised by this, as your work with the Tramontina Bolo shows very different results than mine. We are so far apart that I sometimes wonder if we are talking about the same knife.

All the Tram bolos that I have worked with, including the one pictured here have just had terrible heat treats and very low durability. In addition binding is such a problem in anything thicker than that which can be cut in asingle stork that it is not even a close race.

The GB provides a much higher level of penetration with each stroke, a lower fatigue rate as I am using larger muscle groups, and the pace of chopping with the GB is very smooth (becasue it does not get stuck like the Tram.)

This is the Tram I am talking about (top blade), I think it is the same model that you have (14" Bolo.)
fd553386.jpg


Of course the Tram is like $5 and the GB like $50, but I think the GB is a huge bargain and the Tram is priced according to its quality.

In order to be useable (in any respect) it need to be reground on a belt sander. IN fact it came basicly unsharpened by my standards.


I think your and Frank's disscusion of very low carbon steels is interesting, especially considering that those are the steels used in swords. But I have one comment.

Mid carbon steel (1040-1050) are tough, but I think they lose a lot of strength, and can not be hardened and then tempered and still have a decently high RC (to avoid edge roll.)

A lot of the japanese style blades have a differential hardening, not a diffferential temper. Some swords are not tempred much at all, they are very low carbon steels (compared to other cutlery applications) and they just don't get that hard. The 1045 steel used in many cheap stamped machetes is much the same.

For me, 5160 is perfect for this application as it is very tough, yet can be hardened in the 58-59 range.

While 3V may be tougher, it has other drawbacks, such as not being able to be differentially tempered, and the fact that high cost equipment is needed to work with it in all stages, it is harder to machine and heat treat.

For a bush blade, simple 5160 spring steel takes the cake. . .

I am very interested in seeing the Swamp Rat rendition.
 
Eric,

I agree with just about all the points you made. The only differing experience I have had is with the edge rolling on the medium carbon blades. When I first started playing with the CS Panga machete (1055 steel probably somewhere around 45-50Rc), I thought it edge would roll on green hard wood, but instead I saw very little roll, instead I got more micro chipping (not enough to be concerned with), and eventually the edge would dull by plain old wear. Of course there are limits to this, if you hit something hard enough, or run the edge bevel angle too low (I had the Panga at 15 degrees per side), you will see some roll eventually.

The best explanation for this that I could come up with is the spring temper. If the same steel were over hardened it would likely be vulnerable to large chip outs, and maybe even breakage. If the steel is left too soft, the edge may simply roll over when a spring tempered edge would flex and pop back into place. I would guess that the Trams that you have used were left too soft. Cliff may have gotten one with a better heat treat.





-Frank
 
Originally posted by frank k
I hope that they use a tougher steels like those that have been mentioned instead of 52100 or what ever they use in the Swamp Rat line. I think 0170-6C at Rc 58-9 was not the best choice for the Becker Patrol machete, I would have much preferred, for instance L6 at Rc 56-8, in such a design.

I think that SwampRat's version of 52100 (SR-101) is plenty tough. The famous Busse heat treat has really brought out a lot from SR-101. The larger knives are diferentially tempered and their edges (from my experience) are also very durable. I have made a couple of hard contacts with no chipping, just rolling. On a side note, I still can't believe how easily this stuff takes an amazing edge :D

On the PM, I totally agree. While I have not damaged mine, I worry that I will eventually (from the cases I've seen of others being damaged). I think Camillus was very brave to put out such a radical design. It is so geared toward performance that it is not overly durable (with that steel). However, as you mentioned, with a steel like 5160 or L6 or similar, it would be significantly more durable.
 
Originally posted by Andrew Lynch
I think that SwampRat's version of 52100 (SR-101) is plenty tough. The famous Busse heat treat has really brought out a lot from SR-101. The larger knives are diferentially tempered and their edges (from my experience) are also very durable. I have made a couple of hard contacts with no chipping, just rolling. On a side note, I still can't believe how easily this stuff takes an amazing edge :D

On the PM, I totally agree. While I have not damaged mine, I worry that I will eventually (from the cases I've seen of others being damaged). I think Camillus was very brave to put out such a radical design. It is so geared toward performance that it is not overly durable (with that steel). However, as you mentioned, with a steel like 5160 or L6 or similar, it would be significantly more durable.


Andrew,

What makes Swamp Rat's 52100 significantly tougher than Camillus’s 170-6C?


-Frank
 
I have not used the SR101 yet. I am waiting until I can handle the knives in person first (janurary). But just on speculation I think that having a differential heat treat will improve overall strength and toughness of the knife. I don;t know that it will help edge durability at all though.

0170-6C is the same or similar to Carbon V, which I have found to be an excellent steel. One of the best steels used by any production knife company.
 
Eric,

For a thick 9” Bowie knife like the Battle Rat, BK9 or Trailmaster, something like 52100/SR101 or 50100/170-6C/Carbon V make very good steel selections, they are fairly tough, and with about 1% carbon they will hold an edge very well.

For something like the Patrol Machete, with a 50% longer blade little more than half as thick, I would prefer a steel with greater toughness, since as Cliff pointed out, the impact speed goes up with blade length (and impact energy goes up twice as fast). Basically you end up with about double the impact energy and about half the amount of steel resisting it. Throw in an occasional hard impact and you may see some major damage.
Steels with about 0.5% carbon can be hardened enough to take a decent edge and hold it fairly well (depending on the alloy content), but they don’t have a lot of carbides which tend to lower the toughness (and increase the wear resistance) of the steel.


-Frank
 
frank :

[14" class brush blade]

I could see a cheap one made of something like 1050 with injection molded handles becoming popular.

The main problem would be competition from the decent machete makers. You put a decent edge on a classic martindale design and it works just as well on all light vegetation and comes very close on wood working. How low can you go in price is the question as the machetes are very inexpensive.

[Swamp Rat]

I hope that they use a tougher steels like those that have been mentioned instead of 52100 or what ever they use in the Swamp Rat line.

I would want a simpler steel as the wear resistance of 52100 is overkill, but I would not be so sure to rate it out for durability concerns. The flex and impact tests I have seen are fairly impressive.

[patrol Machete]

I would have much preferred, for instance L6 at Rc 56-8, in such a design.

Yes I would agree rather strongly. This is probably just a case of ease of manufacturing, all the same steel simplifies matters.

[custom]

I would like a guard and a handle which was a little longer and straighter. The convex grind is nice for increased durability.

I tossed around the idea of a guard but left it out for grip versatility, you however would not want to try any hard stabbing with this blade as you could not keep your hand off th edge. The handle is quite long, the blade is ~14", however a two handed grip would be interesting and something I am working on for other large blades. The ocnvex grind is not actually durable because of cross section, it is actually really thin, at the limit at which the blade will get damaged on harder wood. It also runs both ways from the main blade body (towards the edge and the spine), to make the blade cut very smooth in thick and soft vegetation. That dual taper is a classic Malaysian design, I assume to other regions as well, that was just where I saw it first.


[3V impact toughness]

(which is disproportionately high in the transverse direction when compared to non CPM steels).

This you would expect given the low carbide segregation and ultra-fine grain structure inherently due to the CPM process. However edge fractures run the opposite way through the steel and thus this isn't of critical importance. The toughness the other way is what matters mainly, perpendicular to the grain, though 3V is still high there, but not in the same class as the impact tool steels.

Eric :

All the Tram bolos that I have worked with, including the one pictured here have just had terrible heat treats and very low durability.

That doesn't surprise me, they are dirt cheap and I assume QC is not overly high. I would not recommend them for this reason.

In addition binding is such a problem in anything thicker than that which can be cut in asingle stork that it is not even a close race.

1/8" flat stock with a proper edge doesn't bind that much on the wood we have locally. The only excpetion would be spruce which is heavily knotted, on that the hatchet has a many to one advantage, but on anything else the bolo clears wood fine. I just ran a half dozen cuts with it and Lukes blade after edge modifications, and the blade never bound to where I could not simply draw it out, and all the chip clearning cuts didn't stick at all.

Binding is only of concern on hollow ground blades (horrible on the PAB from Strider for example), or on really thin stock. The Patrol Machete for example will bind heavily in the hump and isn't stiff enough to work the wood out either. The lighter machetes, 1/16", will also stick badly. The larger martindales can't be used for wood work of this type either with the tips as the distal taper leaves them too fine.

Which brings up probably a critical point, in the chopping noted in the above with the bolo was done with the contact region being only a few inches infront of the handle. It will bind more towards the tip, but I don't chop that way with that class of blades. I do with longer ones, and for example the 18" Ontario machete when used in this manner would stick so heavily I had to chop it out of the wood.

Mid carbon steel (1040-1050) are tough, but I think they lose a lot of strength, and can not be hardened and then tempered and still have a decently high RC (to avoid edge roll.)

I asked around on this awhile ago and they should be able to get 56-58 RC.

While 3V may be tougher, it has other drawbacks, such as not being able to be differentially tempered ...

The main advantage of 3V is its high toughness which eliminates the need for differential tempering. Though I would agree in general it just adds cost for little functional benefit as the toughness and ductility you can get in much simpler steels.

frank :


[Swamp Rat's 52100 vs 170-6C?]

Without knowing the exact details of both steels, I can't answer as to why they are different, however from my experience with several of Becker blades, and what I have seen from the SR101 testing by Busse, it is the *far* tougher steel. Though I would agree that a simpler steel would be better simply as it would allow a much lower cost, just use a plain carbon steel. I can say with high confidence though, if Busse did release a SR101 large bush blade I would bet heavily on it to be functional as he has easily the most rigerous testing phase of any maker I know durability wise .

I applied a heavy shoulder to Lukes blade, so the edge is now over a quarter of an inch wide. The main edge bevel is shallow, only 10 degrees, it just thickens at the very extreme (in the last 0.020" thick region). Some prelim tests slicing wood shows a fairly large increase in heavy stock removal which I would expect. I should know in about a week if the edge profile is functional durability wise on heavy knot contacts.

I also forgot to mention, Luke shipped the knife with a Kydex sheath. Now I don't like Kydex for these types of knives for its low durability in temperature extremes, however from what I have seen, Luke's is just as good as any functionality wise. The blade is held solid with no rattle, but can be withdrawn without excess difficulty. It also has a drainage hole for ease of flushing. The fit and finish is a little low, a few bends and sways here and there, but this is only a cosmetic concern. It is a one piece fold over design with a folded down belt loop.

-Cliff
 
Originally posted by Cliff Stamp


[14" class brush blade]



The main problem would be competition from the decent machete makers. You put a decent edge on a classic martindale design and it works just as well on all light vegetation and comes very close on wood working. How low can you go in price is the question as the machetes are very inexpensive.


I was thinking something priced between the Martindale bolo and a Patrol machete. The thicker blade stock and primary grind would make it cost more than a simple stamped thin blade machete, but the cheaper steel and handle design would bring costs down compared to the Patrol Machete.



The handle is quite long, the blade is ~14", however a two handed grip would be interesting and something I am working on for other large blades.


I was thinking of something along the lines of a “hand and a half” handle so that the grip could be varied even when wearing work gloves. I would think you might be better off with a brush axe for two handed use.







[3V impact toughness]



This you would expect given the low carbide segregation and ultra-fine grain structure inherently due to the CPM process. However edge fractures run the opposite way through the steel and thus this isn't of critical importance. The toughness the other way is what matters mainly, perpendicular to the grain, though 3V is still high there, but not in the same class as the impact tool steels.



That is true for cracks that would break the blade in two, but for chips, both directions are involved. Since impact strength in the transverse direction is so much lower than the longitudinal for the steels and hardness levels suitable for knives, transverse toughness is usually the best predictor of chip resistance in a knife edge.




[Swamp Rat's 52100 vs 170-6C?]

Without knowing the exact details of both steels, I can't answer as to why they are different, however from my experience with several of Becker blades, and what I have seen from the SR101 testing by Busse, it is the *far* tougher steel. Though I would agree that a simpler steel would be better simply as it would allow a much lower cost, just use a plain carbon steel. I can say with high confidence though, if Busse did release a SR101 large bush blade I would bet heavily on it to be functional as he has easily the most rigerous testing phase of any maker I know durability wise .



SR101, 170-6C and Carbon V are proprietary mystery steels, whose exact composition has not been made public, and are likely subject to change over time. If we assume that SR101 is very similar to 52100 and 170-6C and Carbon V to 50100, then I would expect similar toughness given the similarities between the two steels.




-Frank
 
frank k :

I was thinking of something along the lines of a “hand and a half” handle so that the grip could be varied even when wearing work gloves.

That grip is easily large enough for that and then some.

I would think you might be better off with a brush axe for two handed use.

I used one of them and posted up a review sometime ago, did not like it compared to other tools. But yes to clarify, a two handed length would be for grip versatility and blade balance issues not to swing with both hands.

.. for chips, both directions are involved.

Chips start in the perpendicular direction, and once this happens the resistance to further damage is *much* lower so the damage should be ground out immediately or it will propogate very easily. Having a higher transverse impact toughness would not help in chipping as by the time that comes into play the fracture has already significantly penetrated the edge and the damage is done.

Of course if you can get a higher transverse at no cost to perpendicular by all means, but I would not trade the other way. This is all probably moot as I doubt that the transverse toughness is higher in steels which have lower perpendicular toughness ratios, if it were that would make for some interesting testing.

I have definately not found 3V to be in the same class as the really tough steels impact wise, I have seen rather large blowouts on 3V in fairly extreme usage, chips up to 0.060" thick . This was hammering the edge into the shank of a screwdriver. Yes it would damage any blade, but will just mash the more impact resistant ones.

If we assume that SR101 is very similar to 52100 and 170-6C and Carbon V to 50100, then I would expect similar toughness given the similarities between the two steels.

Yes, however SR101 has a differential heat treat which makes a rather large difference, the QC is also not that high with the Becker blades. I have seen very different behavior on the ones I have used. Busse does a fairly involved heat treat, and the QC during the testing was extremely intensitive. In contrast for example, Fennell did not know the flex limits of the Becker blades when I asked about it. This was just one of many tests performed by Busse when developing the heat treat for SR101.

-Cliff
 
Originally posted by Cliff Stamp
Chips start in the perpendicular direction, and once this happens the resistance to further damage is *much* lower so the damage should be ground out immediately or it will propogate very easily. Having a higher transverse impact toughness would not help in chipping as by the time that comes into play the fracture has already significantly penetrated the edge and the damage is done.



That is only true if the impact direction is perfectly perpendicular to the grain, which in reality it rarely is. A slight glancing blow (or any side loading) may cause a crack to start transversely and propagate the other way. There are also going to be microscopic tears in the very edge which do not propagate due to the wedge shaped geometry of the edge, but may form chips.



Of course if you can get a higher transverse at no cost to perpendicular by all means, but I would not trade the other way. This is all probably moot as I doubt that the transverse toughness is higher in steels which have lower perpendicular toughness ratios, if it were that would make for some interesting testing.

Although I don’t know of one, it should be possible that a powdered metal version of a higher impact steel (such as A9 or S7) could be formulated to increase the transverse toughness without the loss toughness in the perpendicular.



I have definately not found 3V to be in the same class as the really tough steels impact wise, I have seen rather large blowouts on 3V in fairly extreme usage, chips up to 0.060" thick . This was hammering the edge into the shank of a screwdriver. Yes it would damage any blade, but will just mash the more impact resistant ones.


I am not surprised, since decent screwdrivers are made of hardened alloy steel.

CPM3V is not the toughest steel out there, but it dose offer a very good balance of toughness and wear resistance. CPM3V* at 85 ft-lbs is 4 times tougher than D2 (21 ft-lbs), Twice A2 (40 ft-lbs) and 25% tougher than L6 (68 ft-lbs), while at the same time exceeding the wear resistance of D2. The advantage of CPM3V* over these steels in transverse impact is even greater.






-Frank


* edit I originally typed S30V, instead of CPM3V.
 
Back
Top