Review of HolyCow Kevlar Canoe

kgd

Joined
Feb 28, 2007
Messages
9,786
I'm not a real technical canoe guy, but I have been paddling since I was 14 making it a good 27 years since I learned my basic strokes and I have owned a canoe of one type or another for most of that time. My coleman canoe, the first purchase I made with earned money as a kid stayed with me or at least it was tucked away at parents and friends homes until just two years ago and then I finally gave it to my buddy who has a really cool lot up north and he wanted a bush canoe that he could leave way out on his lot at a wetland access. That is where the coleman still resides today and I do get to enjoy taking it for the odd spin when I get to visit him.

The same guy has a Gruman aluminum canoe which I've borrowed and used quite a bit. I always enjoyed its speed but it never was as stable as my Coleman but it sure beat dragging that 76lbs of plastic mass on portage. Also owned a fiberglass canoe from a company in Manitoba when I lived there a couple of years and I can't remember its name. The fiberglass was lighter than the Coleman but barely so and I think it still clocked in at about 65 lbs or so. It was much wider, more of a prospector model, and was kind of a tug boat in the water. I've played with Sportspal's (the ones with the artificial birch bark patterns) and Oldpal's (rentals) but never had the pleasure of paddling a Langsfors. Anyhow, I've tried quite a few canoe's in my day and I always wanted to have something that paddled like my good old Coleman but had the weight of the Gruman. I did some whitewater when I was a kid but that has never been a big draw for me. A canoe is a for all intensive purposes an off-road vehicle to me, not a playmobile. I see it as an access opener and trip facilitator.

Three weeks ago, I finally bought a new canoe. My interest was re-sparked earlier this spring when I went on a trip in Eastern Ontario when I once again thought about just how much easier it would be to access some parts by water as opposed to humping it by land and over swamp. I wanted something light weight for portaging, tough, stable and capable of carrying a heavier load. Kevlar seemed a good bet because it is both lightweight and tough, be able to absorb shocks better than fiberglass. Aluminum could also be good, but frankly its not easy to find makers any more. After a bunch of research I stumbled on the HolyCow Canoe Company. The factory is not too far from my city (near Toronto) and I was able to buy it and pick it up factory direct. Managed to talk to one of the boat builders and they were able to help me answer my questions and guide me through their different models. Internet research turned up not a pile of reviews, but the ones posted were mostly positive reviews and in the end I was swayed by the personality of the owners/builder and the fact that I could in fact return the canoe or get it repaired at the place it was made. Lastely, the price. I picked up a factory second due to some blemish in the paint job and this saved me about $700 off the retail price. I ended paying for a kevlar canoe what most people would pay for a good fiberglass one.

I settled on a 15' prospector-type canoe in kevlar. I've only taken it out for a few small trips so far but am gaining the confidence that it possesses the traits I wanted. Its a joy to haul around on the shoulders and I can throw it on top of my vehicle without help. It tracks nicely, stability is good and turning pretty responsive. Its also not too bad on solo (better than my Coleman was). Anyhow, I prepared a video review of this boat and will be planning a real multi-day canoe route with it for October.

Hope you enjoy!

[youtube]dsHDPB1xeHk[/youtube]
 
Thanks for posting the review KGD. The keel seems to really help in the wind. That has been my experience with keeled canoes like my OT Guide.
 
I was curious as to how would you compare the kevlar to carbon fiber - durability, flex, strength etc.? I have been looking at carbon fiber which runs about $300 more than kevlar. I know that there are hybrid models as well with a combination of both materials as well.
 
I was curious as to how would you compare the kevlar to carbon fiber - durability, flex, strength etc.? I have been looking at carbon fiber which runs about $300 more than kevlar. I know that there are hybrid models as well with a combination of both materials as well.

JW2N - no idea as I have never paddled a carbon fiber one before. I think they are lighter and can get down to the super low weight ranges like 42 lbs etc. This was the first kevlar canoe I've had. Some of its behaviours of this one are intriguing to me. For example, you can dent in the side of the canoe by pressing on it and then it pops back to shape after you remove the pressure. This is very different then the hardened fiberglass boats I've used before and I imagine will be advantageous when hitting rocks and such since the flexibility coupled with high puncture resistance will allow it to accommodate crashes better. This was exactly how my coleman behaved in rapids. You'd smack into rocks and it would just dent in and then pop back out. I only bent the gunwales due to such a smash once and was able to pound it back into shape with a rock. Not sure if I can, or want to do that, with this one. Does carbon fiber have this type of flexibility to it? No idea...

Very good review!!! Van Morrison makes me wanna put my Old Town in the water.

Yep - I agree - it his stuff just makes you want to paddle for some reason!
 
I was curious as to how would you compare the kevlar to carbon fiber - durability, flex, strength etc.? I have been looking at carbon fiber which runs about $300 more than kevlar. I know that there are hybrid models as well with a combination of both materials as well.

In general, the composite material canoes are more responsive than the plastic tupper ware boats like the ABS stuff. We just bought a Wenonah kevlar kingfisher that weighs in at 39 pounds, and so far it's been a very responsive boat. The composite hulls like kevlar and carbon fiber are stiffer, so each paddle stoke gets you more movement in the water. As for in water performance difference between kevlar and carbon fiber, I don't know if it would be noticable. I can say the kevlar is a way better paddling boat than our Old Town camper we had, not to mention way easier to lift up on top of the car at the end of the day. The Old Town was 60 some pounds, while the the 16 foot Wenonah kevlar is 39.

I've become a big believer in kevlar boats!

Carl.
 
Is it possible that hull design differences between the Royalex OT and the Wenonah account for some of the handling characteristics you mention? I note that the Camper is three feet wide with a flat bottom. Did it tend to oilcan?
 
Is it possible that hull design differences between the Royalex OT and the Wenonah account for some of the handling characteristics you mention? I note that the Camper is three feet wide with a flat bottom. Did it tend to oilcan?

I would guess that some of the difference in hull design. The Old Town camper was the blunt vacum shaped royalex hull, while the Wenonah is a hand laid kevlar cloth hull with very fie entry lines on the hull. Very much more streamlined. The Old Town did oil can when it got choppy out on the lake.
 
I am guessing that an "apples-apples" comparison could only be done with identical hulls, though I don't dispute your impressions. I've only paddled a kevlar canoe once, a Bell WIldfire, I think. Conditions for an accurate test were not optimal with wind and choppy water, not to mention my unfamiliarity with this hull.
 
Back
Top