hollowdweller said:
Generally I think the low power scopes are easier if you have bad eyes.
Yep, gotta agree with that.
Svashtar said:
I think many people buy too much scope for their application, and most people shouldn't be shooting beyond about 200 yards anyway in my opinion, at least at game.
Yep, can't disagree with that either.
Svashtar said:
I think the lower power fixed scopes give good eye relief and are easier on folks who are already correcting their vision. A big variable would give you more trouble with your prescription and be more to deal with.
But again, that's just my opinion; I could be wrong...
Norm
The only rifle I have scoped is my Ruger 10/22 in stainless steel.
I've only had it out a couple of times for target shooting and never for tree rat hunting, yet.
I probably bought too much scope for what I really need but it works very well for me and especially in low light.
The scope is a 2X9 Simonds in brushed chrome with large reticles, don't recall the mm size of the top of my head.
It's easy to acquire a sight picture with the 2 power and then up it if I need to about 6 power.
I really like my 2X9 Simonds even if it is one of the less expensive scopes, works fine for a .22 caliber.
I had just shot through it enough to start getting used to it and I imagine when I get to take it out again that it will be a whole 'nother learning experience for me.
Practice, Practice, Practice means just that and not just for one thing but anything you do if you want to get good and stay good at it.:thumbup:
I like ta shoot mi squirrels right trou dere widdle punkin headens.
Barbie has a scope on her Winchester .30-30 but I don't know what it is except it's a 4 power. It's a decent enough scope for Oklahoma and the distances we have here.
