1. Spyderco does have a CATRA and we do extensive testing on all steels. We also test steels for foundries, Like Crucible and Carpenter. We tell others that since we are not an "accredited testing agency", it would not be proper for us to be used as an information source.
2. Any results that are published can be challenged by anyone for any reason. eg: their particular steel did not represent as they wanted.
3. We generally test at the optimal using hardness. We believe that CPM-S60V is not effective at RC61. I dropped an RC62 CPM-S60V blade on concrete and it literally cracked in half.
4. We had different results than those posted. Now what? I think you can see why Spyderco, Buck, Case, Leatherrman, etc. do not publish their results. (I believe there are fewer than 30 CATRA machines in use. They are quite expensive)
5. We learned after 10 years of testing that CATRA results are not the end all and be all of testing. "Real world" testing will sometimes yield different results than the CATRA for unforseen reasons.
6. We've always shared our findings with our customers as to our results. We just don't quote numbers.
sal