S390 is basically T15 with a little higher Co and Mo. That would give S390 a little higher potential hardness and a little lower toughness. In fact Bohler makes T15 as S393 so you can compare the two with their rating system:
https://www.us.bohler.com/app/uploads/sites/92/2022/06/productdb/api/s000en.pdf
I tested CPM-T15 and posted the results here:
https://knifesteelnerds.com/2021/05...eels-xhp-spy27-maxamet-rex-45-420-t15-rex-76/
Thank you for response.
Upon checking Bohler data, S390 seems to have more edge retention than S393 without differences in toughness.
Bohler however did rate K390 as both, more wear resistant and tougher than S390 in cold work processes.
That could be due to these steels having different working hardness, K390 being around 64 HRC and S390 being around 68 HRC.
I decided to speak to few knife makers who use both steels, response was that due to these steels having significant Chromium content (4-5%) tungsten mainly forms softer W6C carbide that doesn't add much to wear resistance. Both steels have vanadium which forms VC vanadium carbides that contribute to wear resistance.
K390 having twice as much vanadium paired with higher carbon content is likely reason why it has better wear resistance.
Apparently, S390 has the edge in red hot hardness which is irrelevant to knives. But being put at same HRC, S390 will be a bit tougher.
One of the makers said that he prefers S390 due to having better edge stability than K390.
I went for S390 because particular maker usually makes this knife in S390 (I just asked for few other things on my knife being done different). It is around 14cm long blade, at around 5mm thickness and is full tang. Hardness range is 66-67 HRC. I think that the toughness should be more than enough for normal use.
I am however interested to hear your opinion about it.